Review: Tron Legacy

The most interesting thing about Tron: Legacy to me is that it got made at all.  I’m old enough to remember the original Tron.  When it was released, it was heralded for its special effects.  The original Tron represented Disney’s best hope of reinventing itself for the 80’s and becoming relevant in the era of Pac-Man Fever.

While the original Tron was eye-popping in its day, the story was just an indecipherable mess.  And it still had that bland “post-Walt” feel that also sunk The Black Hole a few years before.  The revolutionary special effects weren’t enough to make Tron a hit at the box office.  Although Disney made their money back, they considered the film a disappointment and something of an embarrassment.

For the better part of two decades, Tron seemed like a candidate for my list of films that were supposed to launch sequels but didn’t.  But over the years, Tron amassed a devoted cult following on home video.  Film critic Roger Ebert has championed it at his Overlooked Film Festival.  Over time, Tron began to be viewed less as an embarrassment and more as a missed opportunity.

In recent years, Disney has struggled to launch a film franchise.  This is nothing new with Disney really.  Outside of the Pirates films, they have an abysmal track record.  So it’s understandable that in their desperation they eventually decided, “why not try Tron again?”

What I find surprising is that they decided to go the sequel route rather than a straight-up reboot.  A Tron remake would have freed them of baggage from a movie that was a box office disappointment nearly three decades earlier.  But I guess the lure of casting Jeff Bridges was too much for Disney to resist.

A sequel to a 28-year-old movie that never really found much of an audience was a risky proposition at best.  But Disney doubled down on it with a strong holiday release and an even stronger marketing push.  Although the movie was a hit, they were once again disappointed with the results at the box office.  Even with the benefit of 3-D ticket mark-ups, Tron 2 failed to do Pirates business.

With all this in mind, I was interested to watch the latest Tron and form my own opinions.  Was Tron: Legacy another failed attempt to launch a franchise?  Was it a matter of execution or is there something wrong with the Tron concept?  Was it a mistake to make a sequel rather than a reboot?  Or was the movie everything it could have been?

The first thing that struck me as I was watching Tron: Legacy is that the decision to make a sequel to Tron almost 30 years later necessitates a lot of exposition.  Tron was a bit high-concept when it was released.  There were a lot of big ideas that audiences in the 80’s never fully grasped.  Tron: Legacy has to re-introduce all the important concepts to audiences who never saw the original before it can even get started.

But there’s even more heavy lifting to do before the first light disc can be thrown.  We also have to be introduced to our new protagonist, Sam Flynn.  His back story is set up as quickly and nimbly as possible.  The problem is even though Sam is the character the audience is supposed to relate to, we never really get a chance.  We all know his dad didn’t really abandon him and his daddy issues will be resolved once they are reunited in the grid.  Instead, we find ourselves watching the clock waiting for the cool stuff.

It doesn’t help that the film characterizes Sam as a reckless thrill seeker.  In the short time we get to know Sam, he engages in some ridiculous prank against his dad’s company.  He winds up diving off a skyscraper and parachuting into traffic.  The scene ends with Sam being arrested.  But he is apparently released without too many legal worries.  This is apparently something he does annually.  What I’m getting at is that Sam doesn’t act like any one I know and the “real world” scenes don’t bear much resemblance to any world I know.

After a brief cameo from Bruce Boxleitner (Tron himself), Sam finds his way down the digital rabbit hole and into The Grid.  At this point, the eye candy kicks in.  Just like the original film, Tron: Legacy has a state-of-the-art look that is fun to watch.  It’s almost enough to make up for the film’s short-comings in story-telling.

Much like his father, Sam is forced to play in “the games” which are a really impressive show of digital effects.  The disc duels and light cycle races have both been given a 21st century make-over.  And they are fun to watch for 20 minutes or so.  But once they are over, the film has to switch back into story-telling mode.

As was the case with Tron, the story is something of a dud.  Sam escapes the clutches of the evil Clu 2.0.  He meets his father who explains why he never returned from the Grid.  The details of how he has lived as a flesh and blood person in a digital world for 20 years are never really addressed which is probably for the best.

I won’t bother trying to get into all the details of the plot.  I’ve already seen on-line discussions where the plot points are dissected.  Invariably, some fan brings up a comic book in which the plot is further explained.  But if you have to read a comic book to understand the movie, that is a failing on the part of the movie.  The movie should stand on its own and ultimately it doesn’t.

Part of the problem, I think, is with the Tron concept.  Once you start getting into the details of flesh-and-blood people in a digital world, things get dicey.  How much impact, if any, can the events of The Grid have on the real world?  Tron 2.0 suggests that the programs of the Grid can somehow move back and forth into the real world, but it never explains how.

If you could just ignore these questions and focus on the light show, Tron: Legacy might be enjoyable as mindless entertainment.  The problem is, these questions become central to the story.  By the film’s resolution, you can’t ignore nagging questions about the nature of the Grid, what’s going on with Tron and exactly what Clu 2.0 is up to.

Any attempt to really examine these questions ultimately falls short.  The film takes short cuts because the answers either don’t make sense or they would drag the movie down to a crawl.  But simply ignoring them doesn’t work either when they have been made central to the story.

Just as was the case with the original Tron, what you get is a pleasing special effects show saddled with a clunker of a story.  Another missed opportunity.  It’s worth watching if sci-fi is your thing.  But ultimately, it’s not very satisfying.



Posted on April 6, 2011, in Movies, reviews and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. 12 Comments.

  1. It was spectacularly pretty, and had an excellent score, but the plot was so amazingly lacklustre that every few minutes I was jarred out of admiring the scenery by some awful dialogue or a nonsense plot point… but almost pretty enough to get a recommendation just on the sensory dazzle


    • I’m sure I lost a lot of the “razzle dazzle” factor watching this at home. Even so, the eye and ear candy was almost enough to win me over right up until the ending. When all the illogical plot points had to come together to form some kind of ending, it just all fell apart for me.

      If that sequel ever gets made, I hope they put a little more effort into the story!


  2. brilliant action movie from jeff bridges since blown away and the original tron.


  3. the movie wasn’t illogical lebeau. it was brilliant.


    • You’re going to have to explain to me how the ending made any sense at all. Because from where I was standing, Flynn could have ended the conflict with Clu any time he wanted to. Sure, it would have meant sacrificing himself. But he was clearly willing to do that to save his utopia. Instead, he watched Clu turn his utopia into a distopia and commit genocide and THEN he decided to make the ultimate sacrifice to stop him.

      Also, none of that stuff with programs entering the real world made a bit of sense. I can suspend my disbelief for people entering the computer world (although what did Flynn eat for the last 20 years? Where’s his body?? etc.) But even I can’t suspend my disbelief enough to buy a computer program becoming real and walking around the real world. At least not without a better explanation of how such a thing could happen.

      The movie looked brilliant. It had a nice sound track. But the storytelling was lazy.


  4. oh, come on this movie was brilliant! the plot was good the characters were good. i loved the battle between clu and flynn. that movie was so brilliant i would watch tron and tron legacy over and over again. there was one movie i hated that was so boring. you wanna know what movie was boring and didn’t have a good story and ending? Inception. that is the most boring movie i’ve seen. how many freaking dreams did leo dicaprio go through huh? 1, 2 , 10, 100? god that movie was so friggin boring and hard to understand. i hated that as much as i hated titanic. i will never watch inception again.


    • I didn’t love Inception as much as a lot of other people. But I think it’s far and away a better film than either Tron movie. It’s all about the execution. Both the Tron films and Inception had very imaginative premises. But Tron was all surface. It was a pretty light show. But the characters and the plot were too thin. Inception, on the other hand, actually made me care about the fate of the characters.

      Different strokes and all that. But Tron and Tron Legacy both left me cold.


  5. I understood “Inception.”


  6. tron 3 will be just as good as tron 2. i guarantee you.


  7. i enjoyd tron legacy as much as the next person. lebeau you should talk about blown away with jeff bridges and tommy lee jones cause that is a cult classic as much as tron. some people criticized it because some of the phony irish accents tommy lee jones and lloyd bridges used in the movie. but all in all it is a good action classic and mgm is proud of that and it is on the mgm means great movies promo on those old vhs tapes or dvds or you could watch it on youtube. it is great for you to get into that than tron legacy if you like films with jeff bridges and tommy lee jones.


  8. Why TV Doesn’t Want Anime and Action Cartoons Anymore



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: