Advertisements

What the Hell Happened to Sharon Stone?

Sharon Stone

Sharon Stone

Hollywood is a treacherous place.  It take a certain kind of person to make it as an actor.  But however hard actors have it, actresses have it that much worse.  For an actress to make it in Hollywood, well, they have to be strong.  Some might even say they need to be made of stone (Get it?  I’m sorry.  I couldn’t resist.)  Whatever it takes to climb to the top of the A-list, Sharon Stone had it in spades.  She had the looks, the talent, the determination and she was more than a little crazy.

For a time, Stone was the among the highest-paid actresses in Hollywood.  She had the power to get a project green-lit.  She could choose her directors and co-stars.  Stone was A-list.  But her time atop the A-list ended quickly.  As the 90’s ended, Stone’s spotlight faded with it.

What the hell happened?

Stone - Miss Crawford County

Sharon Stone – Miss Crawford County – 1976

When Sharon Stone finally took Hollywood by storm, it seemed like she was an overnight sensation.  But that was not the case.  The truth is that Stone had a long uphill climb to the top.  She fought tooth and nail for years to make it in Hollywood.  Sharon Stone started off as a model and a beauty pageant contestant.  She was a contemporary of Michelle Pfeiffer.

Sharon Stone – Stardust Memories -1980

The two models bonded while auditioning for the role of an extra in Woody Allen’s 1980 comedy-drama, Stardust Memories.  Stone got the role.  But Pfeiffer’s acting career would take off while Stone’s languished.

Stardust Memories is one of Woody Allen’s favorite of his own films.  But pretty much anyone who isn’t Woody Allen hates it.  Although Allen denies that it was his intent, the movie plays like the director telling off his fans.

The image of a young Stone in glorious black and white blowing kisses from a train is a memorable one.  I also liked the bit where the aliens told Woody they liked his earlier, funny movies better.

Stone - deadly blessings

Sharon Stone – Deadly Blessings – 1981

In 1981, Stone appeared in Wes Craven’s horror movie, Deadly Blessings.

The movie takes place on a farm in a rural community.  The locals are extremely religious and distrusting of outsiders.  One day, the farmer is killed by a mysterious figure who runs him over with his own tractor.  Stone played one of the widow’s friends who helps her deal with the mysterious killings.

In one scene, Stone’s character has a nightmare about having a spider forced into her mouth.  The scene was filmed using a real spider.  Stone initially refused to do the scene until the spider had been defanged.  The crew was reluctant to comply as it would make it difficult for the spider to eat going forward.  But eventually, the spider’s teeth were removed and Stone filmed the scene.

Reviews were mostly negative and Academy Award-winner Ernest Borgnine was nominated for a Razzie award for “Worst Supporting Actor”.  Wes Craven was still honing his craft, but there are hints of the horror master to come.

Stone - Silver Spoons

Sharon Stone – Silver Spoons – 1982

In 1982, Stone appeared in a TV movie called Not Just Another Affair and had a guest spot on the TV sit-com Silver Spoons.  Check out Stone’s entrance on the choo choo:

As a working model, Stone also popped up in a ton of commercials throughout the 1980’s shampoo commercial featuring Stone from 1982.

Stone plays a business woman who also looks fabulous playing tennis.  Sometimes she needs a little Finesse.  Sometimes she needs a lot.

Next: Alan Quartermain and Police Academy

Advertisements

Posted on January 8, 2012, in Movies, What the Hell Happened?, WTHH Actress and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 248 Comments.

  1. Stone just never appealed much to me as an actress.
    I never felt like she was particularly terrible. All those razzy nominations could easily have been shared with the screenwriters.

    Like many performers, she needed strong, appropriate material to show off what she could do. “Casino” was that, and she did decent work in it. She certainly tried to do what was best for her career and develop it for her mature years, but it just never really happened for her.

    This was in large part due to her limited range as an actress.

    Like

  2. “The Quick & The Dead” is definitely a bit of a guilty pleasure. That has very little to do with Stone’s performance in it, but I have to give her props for helping to get it made.

    Like

    • Yeah, Quick and the Dead could have been a classic. Great cast. Talented director. I love Raimi! But the script was weak. Raimi tried to hide the lack of narrative with his camera tricks. But ultimately, it wasn’t enough.

      I share your assessment of Stone. But I’ll give her credit for being a very appealing on screen presence. In the right role, she demanded your attention. I actually think if she had tried less hard to be taken seriously and just made more B-grade action movies like The Specialist, she might have lasted longer on the A-list. But she always had an expiration date. As soon as her looks faded, it was over.

      Like

      • The CineFiles: The Most Disappointing Films & An Important Message From Your Host:

        “The Quick & the Dead” is the third movie that’s mentioned. More to the point, Sharon Stone’s performance in particular was criticized (mostly for her apparent overacting).

        Like

        • I haven’t watched the clip. But I disagree that Stone overacted. I thought she was good in the movie. It had other flaws, but Stone was fine.

          Like

        • 10 Actors Who Were Horribly Mismatched To Their Character Professions:
          http://whatculture.com/film/10-actors-who-were-horribly-mismatched-to-their-character-professions.php/3

          9. Sharon Stone – Gunslinger (The Quick and the Dead)

          Sam Raimi’s The Quick and the Dead is an obvious B-movie western parody, for sure, but it still might’ve helped if our lead actress hadn’t been so unconvincing in her role as a badass gunslinger. Granted, Stone tries her best with this one, I guess, and maybe it’s hard to accept her as a character of this type because – plainly put – we’re not accustomed to seeing female western heroes, but it mostly always feels like she’s Sharon Stone in a hat.

          Maybe the problem here is that they made Stone far too sexy, when – in reality – you imagine any woman who spends her time drifting from town to town having sex and murdering mostly everyone she meets would look like a sack of [expletive]. The western genre need to convince us of its historical setting, even with B-movie aesthetics, and I just don’t think Stone knew what to do with her character. Alas, I remain unconvinced that she could kill Gene Hackman in a gunfight.

          Like

  3. Interesting to read her history. Though, to be honest, I only ever know of her from Basic Instinct.

    Like

    • I doubt most people could name two Sharon Stone movies. If they did, I bet the second one would be Total Recall.

      Basic Instinct is almost the sum total of Stone’s career.

      Glad you liked the article. Thanks for reading!

      Like

      • The only 3 movies I’ve seen Stone in are Bobby, Casino and Lovelace. But I was a kid during her Basic Instinct and Silver days so that explains it.

        She was actually one of the standouts in Bobby for me. Her scenes with Demi Moore were well played. I think Stone might be a braver actress than some people who remember her only from her sexpot roles might expect. She certainly isn’t afraid to look old or bad in front of the camera.

        Like

        • I agree. She seems to really enjoy doing character work now that her A-list days are behind her. I was really taken aback by her performance in Lovelace. I had no idea it was her until I read the credits.

          Like

      • Oh btw, great site! I really enjoyed reading the articles, especially the WTHH ones. I like that they focus more on the movies and career choices made with the personal stuff added only when they are relevant to the subject’s career trajectory.

        Like

        • Glad you like it. The career is definitely the focus around here. I never follow the tabloid stuff. The only reason I include it at all is that if I don’t, people start pointing it out in the comments section. So it really only comes up when it is absolutely essential to understanding the big picture.

          Like

  4. Never thought too much about Stone. Possibly the overexposure she received during her best years turned me off. I remember her in Total Recall and Basic Instinct. I think you nailed this one…she got old.

    Like

  5. Sharon Stone had the classic supernova career, burning very brightly for a short period and then fading away. Like everyone else I’d struggle to name two or three of her films outside of Basic Instinct and as you rightly point out, the industry is brutal to ladies once they pass a certain age.

    You really opened my eyes with some of her back story in this article. I hadn’t realised she’d tried to break into a movie career for so long and I also wasn’t aware of her association with Michelle Pfeiffer in their early days.
    You can add Sharon’s name to the long list of her contemporaries that Michelle has comfortably outlasted.

    Like

    • I chose Stone as a subject for a few reasons. The biggest reason was that the Mel Gibson article took a long time, so I wanted someone whose career could be summarized rather quickly. Stone fits that bill. She had a one movie peak and then a quick fall from grace. Also, I knew she had a reputation for being a little daffy (no offense to Mr. Stardust or Mr. Duck.) So, I thought there might be some good stories to dig up.

      The nutty stories weren’t as juicy as I hoped. But I was entertained to find out about the early bonding with Michelle Pfeiffer. I would never have linked the two because in my mind Stone came on the scene in the late 80s and Pfeiffer arrived nearly a decade before that. But they actually started in much the same place. It really highlights Pfeiifer’s amazing longevity!

      I was also more than a little entertained by the quasi-rivalry between Stone and Madonna at the Rassies. And the stories about Basic Instinct and Quick and the Dead were interesting. Once I found out she had so many moderately interesting hooks and could be written up much more quickly than Mel Gibson (or my next subject), Sharon Stone moved to the top of my list.

      Like

  6. stone did good with basic instinct and total recall from paul verhoeven. she also did good in the specialist.

    Like

  7. what about Alpha Dog?

    Like

  8. You are so RIGHT ON with the things you express. . . I am a big movie appreciator and watch all different kinds of films. I like your taste in films and talent as well. I love Albert Brooks, still one of my all time favorites, is Defending Your Life, and his acting in Broastcast News. I so miss William Hurt from the A-list of actors, great actor.

    And once again, you have a great writing personality!! I read a lot, you are so quick witted, and insightful, while leaving a touch of class, in describing the challenges that exist in the Entertainment field.

    First Bog I have subscribed too as well, you are just too much fun to read, and you do your homework! Kudos keep writing, you are a writer. 8)

    Like

    • I’m glad you subscribed and will be sticking around. I’m not used to people telling me I’m right!

      I miss William Hurt too, but at least he still works. I agree with you about Albert Brooks. He’s criminally under-rated! Don’t get me started on how his voice work saved Finding Nemo. Loved Broadcast News. I wish it had a bigger place in movie history. Great film.

      Like

  9. whoops, I meant Broadcast News. . 8)

    Like

  10. A little sad you left out her role in “Irreconcilable Differences.” Not a great film, but I thought she was quite memorable in it, particularly when she belted out that the Civil War wasn’t going to get her down.

    Like

  11. When are we gonna see What the Hell Happened to Cuba Gooding Jnr? Have you seen The Devil’s Tomb?? And this guy won an Oscar!!

    Like

  12. andymovieman

    the specialist was good to see stone and stallone together in that action flick.

    Like

    • I have to admit, I am not a Stallone fan. I rewatched Demolition Man a few weeks ago and I have been meaning to write a bit about the experience. I am amazed that Stallone had as big of a career as he did. I really do not see the appeal. Especially in the 90s when he was coasting on fumes of his earlier success. Stone was still a hot commodity at the time The Specialist was released although her star was fading fast. She was doing less nudity as she was trying to transition into a serious actress. But her shower scene here helped give Stallone a hit when he needed it. It helped keep them both afloat a little while longer I think.

      Like

  13. well stallone is back on top of the box office and i hope expendables 2 will be a hit.

    Like

    • I don’t know if I would say he’s on top of the box office. But Expendables was a very impressive late career come back commercially speaking. I admit, I had written him off some time in the 90s. I never expected to be talking about his career in the present tense in the 21st century. Should give all the other (male?) WTHH candidates hope. If Stallone can stage a resurgence at this point in his career, they can to.

      Like

  14. talk about kurt russell he needs hope.

    Like

  15. Stone never was much of an actress and she was already 34 when “Basic Instinct” was released.

    Like

  16. Beautiful woman, and a talented actress. But she is a textbook example of a one-hit-wonder. I didn’t realize til looking at boxofficemojo how badly all of her star vehicles bombed. Looking back, it’s actually surprising that she got a stream of A-list roles for 7 years after Basic Instinct, with one flop after another. But at this point, who cares? Sharon was very prolific in the 90s, and most of the movies she did were super fun. Sliver, The Specialist, The Quick and The Dead, Last Dance, Diabolique, Sphere, The Mighty, and Gloria (super underrated movie!) are all very entertaining, in my opinion.

    Like

    • I have to admit, I haven’t actually seen most of the films you listed. I did recently rewatch Quick and the Dead and it was even more fun than I remembered. But Sphere was a mess. And Sliver was watered down Basic Instinct. If you like stone, you should check out The Muse. It’s one of her better movies.

      Like

      • I prefer Sliver to Basic Instinct. Michael Douglas seemed out of place in BI. He was and looked too old, and this was most apparent in the disco scene.

        The Muse is the only movie with Stone from the 90s I haven’t seen (i’ve even seen the 4 direct-to-videos she did in 1991 right before BI, because a Stone fan uploaded them all on YouTube). Unless they’ve been taken down, Diabolique and Gloria are still on there–I reccomend them (for Stone fans; not everyone’s cup of tea).

        Like

        • I haven’t seen either one in years. I have seen BI more recently. And I don’t think it has aged well. These days, it plays better as straight-up comedy, which may have been what Verhoven intended. It’s so hard to tell sometimes with that guy.

          I saw Sliver in the theater and didn’t think much of it. Haven’t seen it since. Maybe I’ll check it out again next time it comes on cable.

          The Muse is an Albert Brooks movie. Odds are you either like Brooks or you don’t. If you don’t, you probably won’t like The Muse any better than any of Brooks’ other movies. It’s not one of his best films. But it is good and Stone is great in it.

          Like

  17. You guys are out to lunch!!! Sharon stones career was completely sold by Casino. I don’t care about basic instinct or any other movie you mentioned in this blog. I’ve watched Casino like 10 times in the last week. I can’t stop and don’t tell me it’s all de Niro and Pesci she sold her role beautifully. This was hands down Stone’s best film performance without question. Please you need to watch the movie again if your review was that it was “ok”

    Like

    • It’s definately her greatest performance. She was remarkable in The Mighty, Gloria, and Bobby as well, but not many went to see those films. She’ll always be best known for Basic Instinct, which is unfortunate because it’s a piece of crap movie. Of course a relentless self-promoter like Stone would prefer to be famous for that rather than not being famous at all.

      Like

    • Casino was a boring, overlong piece of garbage.

      Like

      • I only saw it once. I think you’re being harsh. But I do remember being disappointed. I was hoping for something more like Goodfellas.

        Like

      • That was sort of the problem with CASINO; it was little more than a drawn-out-to-the-point-of-dull remake of GOODFELLAS. Didn’t like it at all. I like that Sharon Stone was finally recognized with an Oscar–in spite of a lot of the wretched movies in which she lands, she has talent to burn–but the movie itself was a big step down from GOODFELLAS.

        Like

        • I keep meaning to rewatch it to see if it fares better on second viewing. Back then, there was no way for me to separate it from Goodfellas which was very fresh in my mind. It falls far short of that standard, but lots of films do.

          I have never motivated myself to sit through it again. Which probably says something. I agree that Stone did have a lot of wasted talent.

          Like

    • Sharon Stone in Casino:
      http://oscarnerd.blogspot.com/2012/03/sharon-stone-in-casino.html

      Sharon Stone received her only Best Actress nomination to date for playing Ginger, a prostitute who becomes the wife of the mobster Sam ‘Ace’ Rothstein. Although Stone won the Golden Globe for her performance, I don’t think she was such a serious contender as she didn’t receive a nomination from her fellow SAG members. I suppose if Sarandon had already been an Oscar winner, Sharon could have built up enough momentum to win the Oscar – she was a great star turning in a great performance in a Scorsese movie and so on. I suppose in the end she was second after Sarandon.

      Casino, just like Leaving Las Vegas, is a masterpiece and much better than any of the five nominated Pictures. Although it’s not as amazing as Goodfellas (what can be), it’s so mindblowingly great. Everything is so perfect about it that I actually find it extremely hard to believe that its only nomination came for Stone. The cinematography, art direction, costumes, editing and most of all, the directing – brilliant. De Niro is fantastic as Ace and I’m kind of stunned that she was snubbed during award season. The movie itself has such a depressing, paranoid atmosphere, you just feel that in this world, you just cannot trust anyone and this uncertainty that makes this film so effective.

      If we asked people on the street what they think about when Sharon Stone’s name comes up, very few would say Casino. She’s best remembered for her iconic role Catherine Tramell in Basic Instinct, where she so infamously proved that (unlike Hot Lips) she’s a natural blonde. Then again we are reminded that she’s in fact an Academy Award nominee and surprisingly, it wasn’t for Basic Instinct, but Casino, a gangster film by Scorsese.

      Performances as wives of famous man or gangsters is something very much welcome at the Academy Award thought extremely rarely in the leading category. I’m sure that if the part of Ginger had been played by a lesser-known actress, she would have been campaigned in the supporting category or if Sharon played it now in 2012 with Harvey Weinstein as a producer, she could start writing her speech for her Oscar for Best Actress in a Supporting Role. That being said, Ginger is a very important character in the story of Casino but I wouldn’t swear that the movie wouldn’t be the same thing without her – she fulfills all the criteria of s supporting player: she doesn’t steal the spotlight from the lead, she doesn’t have much screen-time, but has a lasting effect on the movie in her scenes. However, in Stone’s case that effect is so strong that I couldn’t claim that she’s not a co-lead at least. She uses lots of her charisma, sexiness and star power in a part that Madonna was intended to play.

      In the beginning, we get to see a beautiful, hot, intelligent and very confident prostitute, working in Las Vegas. Unlike Sera from Leaving Las Vegas, Ginger successfully avoids devastating circumstances with the help of her wit and her looks. No wonder Ace is instantly mesmerized by her, she’s attractive in every possible way a person can be and she’s indeed a woman to go crazy for. Stone gradually reveals the dark side of Ginger and boy, is it impressive! She’s just amazing in the scene at the wedding party: on the surface, she’s a happy bride but two minutes later she’s a broken-down woman crying on the telephone to her former pimp. It’s interesting that Stone made very different decisions with this character: here, she holds herself back, she’s mostly subtle and as Ginger starts going downhill she goes more and more over the top.

      The only thing that’s working against her is her masterful movie. Starring in masterpieces is a very tough thing for the actor, as it clearly overshadows the merits of the performances. It doesn’t help, either that she’s barely on the screen for a very long time. With a supporting character that would have been fine, but you would expect a lead to be fully in charge of the film. Nevertheless, that’s the most negative thing I can say about Sharon and I must also add that none of it is her fault as once she’s back, she’s dynamite.

      Ginger is not a Carmela Soprano type of character who tries to turn a blind eye on her husband’s activities but inside guilt is just killing her. Far from it: Ginger actively participates in all the action, she doesn’t even try to hide her greed. She knows what she’s entitled to and she’s willing to get it by all means. Stone brilliantly emphasizes how immoral and greedy this woman is, to her it’s no big deal to smoke coke in front of her daughter or ordering her lover to kill her husband instantly.

      Ginger’s not a typical (movie) addict, either. Stone doesn’t want us to feel any sympathy for her, she shows her as the pathetic, broken-down junkie that she really is. I kept being amazed at how well Sharon was able to keep control of her character that was diving deeper and deeper into chaos. On IMDb message boards, I’ve read many complaints about how Stone overplayed Ginger and her whole overacting ruined the movie – in my opinion, that’s the biggest praise that she could get. Stone simply kills the movie with her destructive energy and makes it a truly unpleasant experience.

      This is the reason Sharon’s scenes with James Woods are just amazing: she’s lost almost everything and these moments brilliantly show how much Ginger is tied to her past. ‘Once a hooker, always a hooker’ yells Ace after a really ugly fight with Ginger. Sharon’s varied greatness shows one simple thing: Ginger is incapable of changing. She has calmer, more quiet periods but there comes another breakdown, another night of cocaine and booze. Stone shows us a very painful and disturbing downfall of a woman.

      Eventually, in the highlight of Stone’s performance, Ginger attacks Ace and has a huge breakdown in front of their house: Sharon displays all the emotions of Ginger in a way that we get a brief summary of the character in those few minutes. Although it’s true that she’s one step away from totally ruining the character, she was so in control of her that she remains as fantastic as she was previously.

      Another 1995 lady, another terrific performance. Sharon Stone gives a brutal, chaotic and disturbing performance as Ginger in Casino. She gets rid of all her vanity, glamour and sexiness in the process of creating a living piece of junk. Although the downfall of this woman is very hard to watch, Sharon makes it a wonderful experience, thanks to her wonderful talent, her intelligence and confidence. Excellent work.

      Like

  18. “How I wish I lived in a world where Albert Brooks was more popular than Adam Sandler.”

    You & me both, pal!

    Like

  19. Thanks for writing this. I just was thinking about Sharon Stone the other day. I knew of Basic Instinct and that movie with the Baldwin (now I remember it is Billy).

    Like

  20. I think the idea was that if you cast Stone, the movie had better be an R. If I remember correctly, post -BI the movies in which Stone did nudity were hits and the ones in which she did not were usually disappointments. (Casino being an obvious exception). That’s probably a gross over-generalization. But I think that’s kind of how Hollywood and audiences saw her at the time.

    One of the recurring themes of these articles is actors or actresses strugling to reinvent their images. Stone obviously knew she couldn’t play erotic thrillers forever. She tried early and often to branch out. But audiences and casting agents weren’t especially interested in seeing her do other stuff.

    To me, The Muse is the best example of what else Stone was capable of. She turns in a terrific light comic performance. I really wish she had done more like that. But The Muse was not a hit.

    Like

  21. Based on the comments that I read on Sharon Stone’s IMDb board, perhaps Sharon was partially hurt by the fact that she got her break break (“Basic Instinct”) relatively late (she was about 34 years old when that movie was made/released). One could therefore, argue that usually women who are lacking in real talent and known primarily for the way the look have to get their breaks in the early-mid twenties to make anything happen. It’s also a fair assessment that she owes a great deal of her success (just like Molly Ringwald w/ John Hughes or Michael Keaton w/ Ron Howard and Tim Burton for example) to Paul Verhoeven.

    Maybe another part of Sharon’s problem is that sometime after she became popular, she completely focused on being a character actress (perhaps, that could in part explain her cutting her hair really short) and totally forgot about her physical outlook. Then again, after “Basic Instinct”, she sort of got marked as a femme fatale and more than likely, nobody wanted to see her in different type of roles anyway.

    Ultimately, Sharon didn’t really have that many hits and/or critical success post-“Basic Instinct” to justify her leading lady credentials.

    Like

    • If Stone had gotten her big break earlier, she could have worked the femme fatale angle longer than she did. But she was bored with that almost immediately after BI and Sliver. She probably would have had more chances at establishing herself as a dramatic actress. But I think what sunk her was that most of her post BI movies just weren’t all that good.

      Like

  22. 6 Crazy Hollywood Stories You Probably Haven’t Heard (Bonus story available on The Chive):
    http://www.derober.com/2008/06/26/6-crazy-hollywood-stories-you-probably-havent-heard/

    Basic Instinct grossed over $350 Million and made Sharon Stone a household name. Basic’s writer, Joe Eszterhas wrote a tell-all book about the film Hollywood Animal in which he writes of Sharon,

    “(Stone) was so despised by co-workers that on one of her films, crew members took turns urinating in her bathtub.”

    Like

    • The problem with that story is that it comes from Hollywood scumbag, Joe Eszterhas. I am automatically not inclined to believe it.

      Like

    • 12 Bitchiest Movie Stars In Hollywood:
      http://whatculture.com/film/12-bitchiest-movie-stars-in-hollywood.php/13

      Sharon Stone

      “It’s a new low for actresses when you have to wonder what’s between her ears instead of her legs.” – Katherine Hepburn after viewing Sharon Stone’s performance in Basic Instinct.

      Stone’s career took off in the early nineties when she played a bi-sexual killer in the hit movie Basic Instinct, a film that did everything except hold up over the years. She eventually soared to success with her Oscar nominated performance in Casino before crashing into the depths of obscurity by developing a reputation for being an awful person.

      Not everyone is blessed with intelligence, but Stone ability to shock people through acting ignorant is scary. She once commented that the Chinese deserved to be hit with a tsunami for what their country was doing to Tibet. “That’s karma,” said Stone.

      Her latest comments continue to amaze when she claimed Meryl Streep is successful because she looks like an “unmade bed.” Stone tried to cover herself, saying Streep’s appearance is okay; it gets her more work because she represents every women. Sure Sharon, it does get her more work. Sixteen Oscar Nominations more of work. Taking the high road, Streep stayed silent.

      Like

  23. Mathew Buck’s “Bad Movie Beatdown” of “The Specialist”:

    Mathew notes early on in his review that Sharon Stone besides “The Specialist” has seemingly spent half of her career appearing “in the buff”.

    Like

    • I haven’t charted this, but from Basic Instinct on I’m pretty sure that most of her hits include some nudity and most of her flops don’t. Casino is the only exception that comes to mind off the top of my head. Was she nude in BI2? Do I want the answer to that?

      Like

  24. Stone was too old when she became famous. I never understood why people thought she was beautiful in that trash flick “Basic Isntinct”. I thought she looked her age, and almost like a borderline transexual in some scenes.

    Like

    • I’ll respectfully disagree. I rewatched Quick and the Dead recently and thought she was pretty damn hot in that. And that was several years after BI.

      But her age was definitely a factor in ending her time on the A-list.

      Like

      • All very true. I hadn’t really thought about that before. But Stone really was up front about her age. And probably suffered for it.

        Stone says and does a lot of kooky things. But, don’t you find it just a bit refreshing that she didn’t bend over backwards to hide her age?

        Like

      • I came across the Raquel Welch/Cannery Row story writing the Debra Winger article. The producers claim she was taking too long to prepare to shoot each day. I can see how both things would appear to be true. She takes a long time getting ready in the morning (which presumably takes longer than it did when she was younger). When she gets axed she perceives it to be about age. And maybe it was.

        As a result they got sued and paid a settlement plus they got stuck with a notorious Hollywood hothead.

        As for Stone, I’m with you. I find her nuttiness entertaining.

        Like

  25. Stone’s age was already a problem as early as “The Specialist”. It was ridiculous how she was supposed to have watched her parents get killed as a child, when Stone and Eric Roberts were clearly the same age.

    Like

    • That’s true. The truth is, they just shouldn’t have made a BI 2. My point was that Douglas contributed a lot to the success of the original and the new leading man left a lot to be desired. Realistically, the sequel was a cash grab that came way too late for anyone to care.

      Like

    • From her point of view, sure why not. Take the money and run. Why anyone would pay her $13.6 mill to do it is beyond me.

      Like

    • It would have been better if Eric Roberts and James Woods had switched roles in “The Specialist”. At least Woods was a decade older than Stone.

      Like

      • I have heard versions of this before. And I must plead ignorance up front as I have never watched The Specialist all the way through. But from what I have seen of the movie, the ages of the characters never bothered me. It’s a ridiculous movie. Rod Steiger’s accent struck me as the most absurd thing about it.

        Like

  26. I’m amazed “Basic Instinct II” was ever made at all, as Stone was already too old in the first film and the police would have solved the case using DNA.

    Like

    • Stone was too old though. She was like 35.

      Like

    • Wow, “like 35”? What an ancient artifact she was!

      Like

    • 15 Career-Ending Movies:
      http://www.popcrunch.com/15-career-ending-movies/

      Catwoman & Basic Instinct 2

      Career Ruined: Sharon Stone

      As sadistic as Americans are, we are also pathological optimists. An actor will always get precisely one shot at redemption every decade. So after the reality-warping awfulness of Catwoman which featured Halle Berry lazily beating up baddies while quite seriously uttering lines like “What a purrrrrrrfect idea”, audiences were willing to give both her and villain Sharon Stone another chance.

      Halle Berry responded with Gothika and “Remember guys, I was in Monster’s Ball.” Sharon Stone responded with Basic Instinct 2: a film that tried to recapture the original’s danger and raw sexuality. While it succeeded somewhat, Basic Instinct 2 suffered from a terminal case of “bitch be old now” syndrome. What was edgy in the early 90s makes audiences raised on internet porn yawn with boredom. And though Sharon Stone is impressively hot for pushing 50, the raw, energetic sexuality had given way to something that was just sinister and boring.

      Like

      • 10 Delayed Sequels That Really Weren’t Worth The Wait:
        http://whatculture.com/film/10-delayed-sequels-that-really-werent-worth-the-wait.php/4

        Basic Instinct 2 (14 Years)

        Basic Instinct is hardly a classic, but Paul Verhoeven’s erotic thriller does boast the director’s usual overblown style and a career-making performance from Sharon Stone as the psychopathic Catherine Tramell. Riding a wave of publicity, the movie would go on to earn over $350m at the box office, unsurprisingly generating talk of a sequel. After over a decade stuck in development hell Basic Instinct 2 (subtitle Risk Addiction completely optional) was finally released.

        And it was just awful.

        Quite possibly one of the worst sequels ever made, the follow-up was a critical and commercial disaster, earning just $38m worldwide against a budget of $70m and being savaged by reviewers, with the movie currently sitting at a whopping 7% on Rotten Tomatoes.

        Not even ‘so bad it’s good’ but just plain terrible, the plot is equal parts predictable and stupid, and it instantly became clear why the only person that had any real interest in the long-delayed sequel was Sharon Stone.

        Like

    • I think Stone actively fought against her sex symbol image to her detriment. Basinger embraced it.

      Like

    • COMMENTARY TRACKS OF THE DAMNED:
      http://www.avclub.com/articles/basic-instinct-2,22344/

      Crimes:
      • Having Sharon Stone reprise her role as an annoyingly fatale-ish femme, without wrapping her in the irony that director Paul Verhoeven brought to the original

      • Staging ridiculous sex scenes, designed to show off Stone’s surgically enhanced, trainer-toned, thoroughly un-sexy android body

      • Packing all its shock and fizz into an opening sequence that has Stone masturbating while racing through the streets of London in a car with her drug-addict athlete lover, then settling in for two hours of not much

      Like

      • Shameful Sequels: Basic Instinct 2:

        zzzzzzZZZZZZZzzzzzzZZZZZZZ… plus some Nerdquest stuff at the end!

        Like

        • So Bad, It’s Horrible – Television Tropes & Idioms:
          http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Horrible/Film

          A leaked trailer for Basic Instinct 2 promised the same level of sleazy entertainment as the first, with images of lurid and deviant sexual encounters. Not only did the final print not have these scenes, but it was also boring with painful acting and an ending that boggled the mind. Oh, and you don’t get to see Sharon Stone’s snatch, in case you were wondering. MikeJ gives his review of Basic Instinct 2 for Shameful Sequels.

          Like

        • 15 Laziest Movie Sequels Of All Time:
          http://whatculture.com/film/15-laziest-movie-sequels-time.php/3

          1. Basic Instinct 2 (2006)

          Paul Verhoeven’s Basic Instinct entered the public consciousness when it was released in 1992, becoming famous for that leg-crossing scene and grossing over $350m at the box office. After over a decade in development hell, the sequel arrived looking to emulate that success. Unfortunately, it was essentially a redo of the original except nowhere near as entertaining.

          Switching the action to London and replacing Michael Douglas’ cop with David Morrisey’s psychiatrist, the story follows the template of the original almost to a tee as the man dealing with Sharon Stone’s Catherine Tramell becomes increasingly drawn into her web – to the detriment of his personal life and career. However, whereas Verhoeven’s visual flair elevated the ridiculousness of the original, the sequel is just plain awful.

          Basic Instinct 2 flopped hard, earning less than $40m against a $70m budget. Wisely, Michael Douglas opted not to return for the long-gestating follow-up, saying that the premise “had been done perfectly effectively” in the original. He was right, as this retread of the concept was sees Stone almost descend into self-parody amongst the clichéd and predictable story.

          Like

    • 15 Hollywood Comebacks That Didn’t Take (Maybe These Celebrities Find A Side Gig):
      http://styleblazer.com/107025/15-hollywood-comebacks-that-didnt-take-maybe-these-celebrities-find-a-side-gig/13/

      The Basic Instinct star received a fine reception from audiences with supporting roles in Alpha Dog and Broken Flowers. Ironically, her return to the franchise that made her a star, Basic Instinct 2, informed the film industry her days as a big-screen leading lady seemed to be behind her.

      Like

      • Second Time’s (Not) A Charm: 15 Stars Who Messed Up Their Iconic Roles For Crappy Sequels:
        http://styleblazer.com/107950/second-times-not-a-charm-15-stars-who-messed-up-their-iconic-roles-for-crappy-sequels/15/

        It is hard to quantify the failure that is Basic Instinct 2. The original film was a huge hit, making Sharon Stone an icon overnight. Produced 14 years after Basic Instinct, the sequel had Stone reprise her role as femme fatale Catherine Tramell. Thanks to a convoluted plot, the replacement of star Michael Douglas with English actor David Morissey, and Stone’s cougar-y take Tremel, the film was panned by critics and tanked at the box office, grossing back a little over $3 million of its $70 million budget.

        Like

      • Mr. Floppy 10.13.07: Basic Instinct 2:
        http://www.411mania.com/movies/columns/61438/Mr.-Floppy-10.13.07:-Basic-Instinct-2.htm

        Year of the cock-up: 2006

        Budget: $70,000,000

        Domestic gross: $5,971,336

        Foreign gross: $32,658,142

        Worldwide gross: $38,629,478

        Up until the year 1992, no one knew the name of Sharon Stone. She was easily and regularly lost amidst the other dozens of blond bombshells. On her path to glory, she earned her chops in many obscure projects (Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol, Above the Law…). A very small break came when she starred as Arnold Schwarzenegger’s bitch of a wife in Total Recall. The sci-fi action flick was a big hit and Sharon Stone finally had a chance at achieving the desired stardom. And she did.

        Today, millions of people know her for her characteristic steel blue eyes, thick eyebrows, throaty voice and of course- her intimate parts. The first collaboration with Holland’s premiere director on Total Recall was a successful one, so Sharon Stone didn’t hesitate one second when she had the opportunity to work with him again. And with the interrogation scene in the original Basic Instinct, Sharon Stone and director Paul Verhoeven secured their place in movie history.
        After the premiere, Stone claimed she had no idea her vajayjay is going to be on screen and then continued to bash director Paul Verhoeven for showing us the infamous close-up. He claimed the opposite- i.e. Sharon knew about the shot. Regardless of which side was telling the truth, Sharon Stone’s career wouldn’t sky-rocket if that shot wasn’t included, since it was definitely THE thing people were talking about in Basic Instinct related conversations. The movie itself wasn’t half bad either and the star-power of Michael Douglas (ah, those were the days…) combined with controversy helped the movie to generate quite a lot of box office revenue. The lesbian and gay activists protested, but who cares, right? We saw the beaver, we saw some tits and some violence all wrapped up in a decent detective story- everyone was happy. Except the ever-greedy studio of course.
        Immediately after the success of the first Basic Instinct, studio heads started to think about squeezing out a sequel. Sharon Stone’s career however really took off and thus these ideas went nowhere. But only for the time being.

        It could (and should) have stayed that way, but then I would have one less movie to write about, so I guess it all somehow worked out in the end.

        The years went by, wrinkles accumulated on Sharon’s face and her acting career wasn’t in the best spot. After it reached the high-point with an Oscar nomination for Casino (a very much deserved one), there was only one way to go- down. Sphere, The Muse, Gloria, Simpatico- yes, it was hell alright for the once popular Sharon. No matter what roles she decided to accept- the effort always resulted in something below the average at best. So like all the broke former stars eventually do, she decided to do a sequel to her biggest hit and return to her most famous role. The clever Sharon even used the tried formula that she “was just waiting for the right script”. The studio was thrilled and negotiations started right away. They definitely should have known better.

        Sharon played her cards pretty smart-she agreed to reprise her role under “pay or play” arrangement, which meant that she’d got paid whether the movie would get made or not. Studio agreed, because after all, they knew they had a surefire hit on their hands and they were sure the film would get made. Eventually it would, but if they knew about the future complications, I’m sure they’d withdraw as soon as possible.

        The production was set to begin in 2000, but problems no one thought of suddenly surfaced. You see, the snag was, no actor with at least a bit of self-esteem agreed to participate as the male lead opposing the wrinkly Sharon. Ol’ Michael Douglas didn’t think about it even once, so a decent enough replacement was needed.

        Robert Downey Jr. was slated to participate, but fortunately for him, he was charged with drug possession. And they say drugs are bad for you. Do you think he would be in Iron Man next year if he took part in this? So yes, going to jail can sometimes be better for your acting career than to make a movie. After Downey dropped out, desperate producers started contacting anyone who had a dick and at least one half-decent movie on his track record. Viggo Mortensen, Benicio Del Toro, Aaron Eckhart, Kurt Russell, Harrison Ford, Pierce Brosnan and even f’n Bruce Greenwood all turned down this lucrative offer.

        Remember what I wrote about self-esteem? In walks Benjamin Bratt who obviously thought this is a can’t-miss opportunity, but unfortunately for him, the one willing actor was unfortunately also the one Sharon Stone wasn’t willing to roll around in bed with. Her motives remain unclear (maybe some problems on the set of Catwoman – a surefire future inductee), but she vetoed Bratt’s participation. My dear friends-when you’re rejected by a near 50 year old has-been after auditioning for a destined-to-fail sequel, your stock has hit an all-time low.

        Because of these shenanigans, the producers missed their February 2001 deadline to start shooting, so Sharon “Team Player” Stone filed a lawsuit against them, claiming 100 million dollars in damages. Obviously, this has been a happy collaboration for both sides. Three years later, the two parties settled their case off court and the movie was back in production. Why?
        Well, after all this time, the movie already cost the studio quite a bit, while not a single shot was made and the poor morons hoped they’d get their money back when Basic Instinct 2 would finally hit theaters.
        So unsurprisingly, it was all about being quick from that point forward. They hired Michael Caton-Jones to direct, and dragged the first bum that happened to be around the studio building to act as the male lead. With that, David Morrissey was in, but unfortunately for any potential moviegoer, he possesses less charisma than Carrot Top.

        The film was shot and the budget bloated to a whopping 70 million dollars (and that’s only an official number, it’s probably even more). That’s quite a lot for a movie with exactly 1 well-known star (David Thewlis doesn’t count) and no sequences requiring anything of significant cost. Sharon hyped the movie on talk-shows, horny teenagers were salivating on the prospect of seeing a MILF in action and everyone else pretty much didn’t give a fuck.

        The movie opened in March 2006, with approximately $3,201,420 as its weekend gross. In other words- a complete debacle. It left American theaters only after 17 days. David Morrissey’s career didn’t jump start as he probably hoped it would (actually, this movie was a nice, firm break in the little momentum he had). Sharon Stone’s pretty much ended.

        This week’s Mr. Floppy is actually the first ever Mrs. Floppy. The producers Mario Kassar and Andrew G. Wajna were also to take the blame, but it really comes down to Mrs. Stone. She’s the one, who has an alleged IQ of 154 and still thought that anybody still cares to see her naked (much less her beaver) at 48 years of age. She’s the one who went after the producers with this, she’s the one who sued like an idiot when the shooting didn’t start, she’s the one who still agreed to star in this after her lawsuit and eventually she’s the one the movie-going public didn’t give two ounces of f*** to see. You can say she was in it for the money, but I believe she already has enough money on her bank account. Just like Arnie in Terminator 3, or recently Bruce Willis in Live Free or Die Hard, she just wanted that one final bask in glory. Too bad the movie sucked a**, and it wasn’t even entertaining in its awfulness. It’s just incredibly dull, boring, stupid- simply, a piece of shit. Personally speaking, it’s one of the most boring movies I’ve ever seen. No wonder no one went to see it.

        Since Basic Instinct 2 was a Sharon Stone vehicle, I hereby award her the title – Mrs. Floppy.

        Like

      • THE TOP 5 CAREER MISSTEPS:
        http://www.411mania.com/music/columns/70450

        Bryan Kristopowitz

        2. Sharon Stone – Basic Instinct 2

        Sharon Stone is going to be remembered as the “hot chick in the white skirt showing everyone her bingbangboom,” Catherine Tramell, in Basic Instinct. The movie was huge, her performance was amazing, and it seemed like a no brainer that a sequel would happen. I don’t think anyone anticipated that it would take fourteen years for that sequel to get made. And I don’t think anyone anticipated that the sequel would be absolutely awful. Just awful. And the flick died at the box office. Basic Instinct will live on. The sequel will not. And I don’t think anyone is going to ask Sharon Stone to be a sex killer again.

        Like

        • It was a bad career move because it ended her career.

          Although I’m amazed the sequel was ever made at all, considering the original film was awful.

          Like

    • “Basic Instinct 2” strikes me as one of those movies involving an actor, whose career has been on the decline for some time seemingly out of desperation and/or nothing to lose going back to the role that gave them the most success. It’s like when (in the context of this WTHHT series) Eddie Murphy did “Beverly Hills Cop 3” (right down to getting his “Trading Places”/”Coming to America” director John Landis to work on it) or Arnold Schwarzenegger did “Terminator 3”.

      Like

      • Totally agree. All three of those movies were made out of desperation and a desire to cash one more big paycheck.

        Like

      • Great movie comebacks:
        http://www.denofgeek.us/movies/13102/great-movie-comebacks

        The Failures

        Of course, comebacks don’t always quite pan out as expected. Normally, when an actor is considered a ‘has-been’, it’s for a good reason. Perhaps, they were never any good in the first place? Maybe they’ve grown old and lost their looks? Or possibly, the world just isn’t interested in them any more. So to finish off, here’s a brief list of failed comebacks:

        David Carradine – Kill Bill

        Beneficial to his career, maybe, but not the success that was probably expected.

        Jean-Claude Van Damme – Universal Soldier: The Return

        Sorry, Jean-Claude, no one cares anymore.

        Paul Hogan – Crocodile Dundee In Los Angeles

        Dear oh dear. Perhaps you should try sounding a bit less Australian, Paul.

        Sharon Stone – Basic Instinct 2

        MILFs are okay for a five-minute fumble when your housemates are out for the night, but not for mainstream cinema.

        Like

      • 10 movie stars and the franchises they rely on:
        http://www.denofgeek.us/movies/13634/10-movie-stars-and-the-franchises-they-rely-on

        EDDIE MURPHY

        The Franchise: Beverly Hills Cop
        Last Time Used: Beverly Hills Cop 3

        When it was revealed that Eddie Murphy was to reprise the role of Axel Foley in Beverly Hills Cop 4, eyebrows were raised for a number of reasons. Firstly, how did he get himself into a position where he needed to do it, just a year after he snared an Oscar nomination for Dreamgirls? And secondly, the last time Murphy tried to revive his career with a Beverly Hills Cop movie, things didn’t go to plan at all. BHC 3 came off the back of what was a promising mini-Murphy revival with Boomerang and The Distinguished Gentleman, but sent his career firmly back to the doldrums until he stumbled upon The Nutty Professor a few years’ later. Bluntly, there’s no guarantee that the Axel Foley card carries anywhere near the weight it just had, and BHC 4 can safely be classed as a gamble. But then, Murphy is surely fast running out of chips…

        ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER

        The Franchise: The Terminator
        Last Used: Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines

        One UK magazine (think it was Film Review) writer predicted in the aftermath of Terminator 2’s enormous box office success that Arnold Schwarzenegger would never again be able to draw in such numbers. It’s a prediction that’s been proven correct, too, and while Arnie is currently fulfilling his political ambitions, should he ever choose to return to movies, he’s likely to have more trouble than ever generating a hit. When he made Terminator 3, he hadn’t had a huge success in a long time, with the likes of End Of Days, Jingle All the Way, The 6th Day and Collateral Damage all delivering numbers far off the Austrian Oak’s best. T3 did, however, bring home the bacon, although it’s hard to assess its longer term impact for Arnie, given that he’s not headlined a film since. His most pressing problem may be though that the Terminator franchise is now going ahead without him, perhaps removing it as an option for him altogether. For while a Terminator film with Arnie is always likely to be more popular, he may no longer be vital to the series. And that could make Predator 3 all the more appealing…

        SHARON STONE

        The Franchise: Basic Instinct
        Last Used: Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction

        Proof that it doesn’t always work. Sharon Stone hadn’t had a hit that she’d headlined pretty much ever from what we can work out, and so Basic Instinct 2 was the film she kept talking about, no doubt with an eye on resurrecting her commercial fortunes. Big mistake. A cast-iron bomb that destroyed not only any hope of a BI3, but also Sharon Stone’s leading star status, Basic Instinct 2 is a wise lesson in knowing which franchises can be redeployed and which, er, can’t. It’s unlikely her career will ever really get anywhere near where it was at the start of the 90s.

        Like

        • 10 Horrifically Unnecessary Movie Sequels That Nobody Wanted:
          http://whatculture.com/film/10-horrifically-unnecessary-movie-sequels-that-nobody-wanted.php/6

          6. Basic Instict 2: Risk Addiction (2006)

          Basic Instict 2. Yeah, this exists. And would you believe it if I told you that it actually stars Sharon Stone in the central role? Please do. I’m telling the truth. Presumably the product of her own ego and the fact that she needed to make a quick buck fast, Stone leapt upon the chance to gift all those Basic Instinct fans who have been hammering for a sequel the follow-up they deserved. Or, at least, it would be nice to imagine that’s what happened. Risk Addiction actually happened, I think, because Sharon Stone wanted to play “middle-aged” sexy.

          It must be pretty tough if you used to be the sexiest woman in Hollywood, after all, which can be Stone’s only real reason for getting back into character as crime novelist and suspected serial killer Catherine Trammell. The plot has her on the run from Scotland Yard after a horrific masturbation-induced car accident (you read that right) gets her into some serious trouble. There’s a character in this called Dr. Michael Glass. I don’t know why that’s funny. It probably isn’t. And yet… that’s the most interesting thing about the whole movie. Go figure.

          Like

        • 10 Failed Attempts To Sell A Movie With Sex:
          http://whatculture.com/film/10-failed-attempts-to-sell-a-movie-with-sex.php/2

          9. Basic Instinct 2

          It’s pretty clear to everyone except Sharon Stone why Basic Instinct 2 flopped, and that’s because most people aren’t too fussed about seeing a 48-year-old woman cavorting around on screen without her clothes on, even if Stone has aged considerably well.

          After the rampant sexiness of the 1992 original, it was just a step down, and frankly, from the perspective of a studio head, I’m surprised they didn’t introduce a young sexpot to serve as Stone’s protege this time around; that might have fared better, I imagine.

          A colossal flop, the film barely took over half its budget, raking in $38 million against a $70 million production cost, making it clear that Stone’s body was not as in demand as it once was. That, and the film is an absolutely absurd mess.

          Like

    • The top 10 unerotic erotic thrillers:
      http://www.denofgeek.us/movies/22005/the-top-10-unerotic-erotic-thrillers

      5. Sliver (1993)

      Both Sharon Stone and writer Joe Eszterhas were hot property after the success of Basic Instinct, so a movie that reunited the pair of them must have sounded like box-office gold. But while Sliver didn’t do too badly at all financially, it was critically panned, and nominated for numerous Razzie awards for its acting and writing.

      Based on a novel by Ira Levin, Sliver was set in a New York apartment building (the sliver of the title) in which high-flying editor Carly (Stone) finds herself in a romantic triangle with the building’s owner Zeke (William Baldwin) and a writer, Jack (Tom Berenger). As various residents begin to die, Carly begins to suspect that both men may have something to hide…

      That’s the thriller element of the plot, at any rate, which doesn’t sound too bad when written down – like Die Hard with more sexual tension and fewer guns.

      Unfortunately, the film fails to do anything noteworthy with the voyeuristic themes implied in the novel, the script is peppered with painfully unsexy exchanges (“Anybody ever tell you you have a nice butt?” Baldwin asks Stone), and Philip Noyce fails to direct the film with the same trashy verve that Paul Verhoeven brought to Basic Instinct.

      Trimmed to avoid an NC-17 rating, the already tepid sex scenes are left looking rather coy, and William Baldwin spends most of the film looking alternately sad and bored – though in fairness, the camera spends more time pointed at Baldwin’s arse than his face.

      If you want more proof of Sliver’s profound lack of eroticism, here it is: UB40 provided a song for the soundtrack, and in one scene, Sharon Stone plays golf in a dressing gown. Case closed.

      1. Basic Instinct 2 (2006)

      Sharon Stone returned for this belated sequel to her 90s hit, which relocates its action from America to London, and misplaces all traces of eroticism in the transatlantic flight. Catherine Tramell, still a bestselling novelist, loses her footballer boyfriend during a post-orgasmic car crash (complete with cinema’s most bizarre cameo: Stan Collymore). With the police sensing foul play, psychologist Dr Michael Glass (David Morrissey) is given the task of finding out just how crazy Catherine is, and naturally, much fornication ensues.

      Like all the films on this list, the sex scenes in Basic Instinct 2 aren’t terribly sexy, and even the earthy chatter is awkward. Sharon Stone’s saddled with such hideous lines as “Even Oedipus didn’t see his mother coming” and “I’m devastated. I may never come again.” Brr.

      In the US, Basic Instinct 2 was subtitled Risk Addiction, which sounds like someone obsessed with strategy board games – a scenario which may actually have proved sexier than the resulting film.

      Like

    • The 50 Worst Movie Sequels of All Time:
      http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2013/05/worst-movie-sequels-ever/basic-instinct-2

      3. Basic Instinct 2 (2006)
      Director: Michael Caton-Jones
      Stars: Sharon Stone, David Morrissey, David Thewlis, Hugh Dancy, Neil Maskell, Charlotte Rampling

      If not for Sharon Stone’s presence, Basic Instinct 2 would’ve been just another straight-to-DVD non-event, likely co-starring a Lindsay Lohan type and shown on Cinemax late at night. And multiplexes worldwide would’ve been much safer.

      But some under-qualified producers and financiers mistook the calendar’s 2006 for 1996. Thinking that Sharon Stone was still a bankable star, this mind-numbing sequel’s backers operated under the pretense that fans of erotic thrillers were clamoring for Stone to once again grab the ice pick used in 1992’s smutty triumph Basic Instinct.

      The dilemma: By 2006, has-been Stone’s forced “sexiness” was shameful, not seductive. Saddled with a campy plot and one of those painfully ludicrous twist endings, Stone’s bid for a comeback was a career killer of the sleaziest kind.

      Like

  27. Agree on 5$ a Day as a decent film. I was intrigued by the combination of Stone and Walken, and it turned out to be good.

    Like

  28. 20 Movies That Made Us Think Differently About The Actors In Them (And Not In A Good Way):
    http://styleblazer.com/73727/20-movies-that-made-us-think-differently-about-the-actors-in-them-and-not-in-a-good-way/7/

    An actress who had her biggest smash before the Internet existed to immortalize her greatest moment in history, has to be choosy in the roles she picks. Starring in Catwoman did her career no favors. She tried to bounce back with Basic Instinct 2 but after 14 youth stealing years–no one really bought it. And no ones likely to ever again.

    Like

  29. Why Did Sharon Stone’s Career Go South?:
    http://frettsonfilm.com/2013/02/27/why-did-sharon-stones-career-go-south/

    She’s barely recognizable under an unflattering mop of black curls—and maybe that’s the point—but that’s Sharon Stone on the cover of the new straight-to-DVD release Border Run. Arguably Hollywood’s hottest star (in more ways than one) back in her Basic Instinct days, Stone hasn’t exactly been on a roll lately. Is this a case of Hollywood’s ageism/sexism, discarding a pinup when her sex appeal starts to fade?

    Stone turns 55 next month, and still looks pretty great despite her Border Run coif, if you ask me. But it doesn’t take a math whiz to figure out that means she was nearly 35 when Basic came out, which is like 50 in movie-starlet years. Before that, she’d mostly toiled in forgettable b-movies like Action Jackson, Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol and Allan Quartermain and the Lost City of Gold. Arnold Schwarzenegger put her on the star map when he blew her away in Total Recall—”consider that a divorce,” he coolly quipped, prefiguring his messy split from Maria Shriver by two decades. But as bisexual murderess Catherine Tramell in Basic Instinct, it was her crotch shot seen round the world that made her a global megastar.

    What followed was a nearly uninterrupted decade-long string of commercial and/or creative bombs—Sliver, Intersection, Diabolique, The Specialist, Last Dance and Sphere among them. Some weren’t bad ideas on paper (playing the title role in Albert Brooks’ disappointing comedy The Muse). Some were (needlessly remaking John Cassevetes’ Gloria with Sidney Lumet). And some weren’t bad movies—Sam Raimi’s underrated Western The Quick and the Dead, for example, not to mention her Oscar-nominated turn as a prostitute-turned-trophy wife in Martin Scoresese’s Casino.

    But her luck soon ran out. The Quick and the Dead started to describe her movies’ run in theaters. They weren’t The Mighty, nothing was Simpatico and she found herself Picking Up the Pieces. The 2000′s were a lost decade—anyone remember Beautiful Joe, Cold Creek Manor, Broken Flowers, If I Had Known I Was a Genius, When a Man Falls, The Year of Getting to Know Us or $5 a Day (and no, that’s not what she was getting paid, although it might not be far off)? Stone probably wishes we could forget her catfights with Halle Berry in Catwoman, her role as an obese, suicidal mom opposite Justin Timberlake in Alpha Dog and the underexposed sequel Basic Instinct 2 (from which costar David Morrissey has only recently recovered with his work as the Governor on The Walking Dead). But try as we might, we can’t.

    With the simultaneously preachy and exploitative Border Run—an unwatchable “thriller” about a right-wing journalist (Stone) who changes her views on immigration after her relief worker brother (Billy Zane, who’s sunk a long way since Titanic) is kidnapped by “coyotes”—Stone may have finally hit rock bottom. So there’s nowhere to go but up, and she may be headed in that direction as Amanda Seyfried’s titular porn star’s mother in Lovelace, which recently played at the Sundance Film Festival. She’s also part of the impressive ensembles of a pair of promising indie comedies, Gods Behaving Badly (she plays a modern-day Aphrodite, alongside Christopher Walken, John Turturro, Oliver Platt, Edie Falco and Rosie Perez) and Fading Gigolo (with Woody Allen, Liev Schreiber, Sofia Vergara and John Turturro again!).

    Gigolo marks a belated and unlikely reunion for Stone, who made her big-screen debut in 1980 with the wordless role as “Pretty Girl on Train” in Woody Allen’s Stardust Memories. One can only hope she leaves us with more than that.

    Like

    • Border Run looks awful beyond belief.

      Like

    • They Threw It Away – Self-Destruction and Acting Careers:
      http://www.datalounge.com/cgi-bin/iowa/ajax.html?t=13556983#page:showThread,13556983,3

      Sharon Stone got married to that creep that ran the SF Newspaper. The Chronicle? Anyway she walked away around 40 which was probably pretty stupid and was known to be a pain in the ass and crazy.

      by: Anonymous reply 53 01/06/2014 @ 04:35PM

      Like

      • 20 Celebs You Probably Wouldn’t Want To Work With:
        http://www.lipstickalley.com/showpost.php?p=17014169&postcount=1

        1. Sharon Stone

        Sharon Stone is a diva with a capital “D” and thoroughly enjoys her stardom, and who can blame her? She worked hard to get there and refuses to feel guilty about making demands.

        We suppose she’s been giving her colleagues hard times, but her quotes are quite right. Oh, yes, we forgot she is out-of-this-world intelligent.

        “Some people work hard in this business and become really popular, really big stars but they never receive an award from within the business. Somehow, when your colleagues and friends believe in you to the point of handing you an award it means so much more,“she says in her diva manner, and continues about life wisdom, “I feel more grounded and more settled than I ever have. I don’t know whether that is to do with my spirituality or whether I’m wiser about life, but as you age you become more selective about what you listen to, devote your time to and who you hang out with.“

        On a website Failing at Famous, you can read an experience of her former assistant, saying, “Ugh, I worked for her as her personal assistant for a couple of months and I’m pretty sure she’s my least favorite person on the entire PLANET. She was a complete b**** all the time, yelled at me for everything, unless she wasn’t yelling, at which point she was belittling me.“

        On the other hand, we can understand this as she is just another aging sex symbol. In addition, just to show she knows it, too: “There was a point in my 40s when I went into the bathroom with a bottle of wine, locked the door, and said, ‘I’m not coming out until I can totally accept the way that I look right now.’“

        Like

  30. Why Did ‘Basic Instinct’ Cause All the 90s Scandal When ‘Color of Night’ Was So Much Trashier?:
    http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/features/why-did-basic-instinct-cause-all-the-90s-scandal-when-color-of-night-was-so-much-trashier.php?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=rejectnation

    When you think about 90s pop culture, you have to think about Paul Verhoeven’s 1992 erotic thriller, Basic Instinct. That movie dropped like a bomb, dominating the entertainment news cycle for months and inspiring years worth of parodies. Its success didn’t come because Michael Douglas’ cop character investigating a murder made for all that interesting a story, or because Verhoeven orchestrated the thing all that well either. It came almost solely because people were so shocked by the content. There were threesomes, ice pick murders, and, of course, there was that interrogation scene where you could catch the briefest glimpse of Sharon Stone’s vagina if you turned your head sideways and squinted. The 90s were more innocent times—before the near daily release of celebrity sex tapes—so this was intense stuff, and Basic Instinct made a mint off the scandal.

    Two years later, a sporadically working director named Richard Rush tried to cash in on the trashy erotic thriller craze by making Color of Night, a murder story that starred Bruce Willis as a troubled psychologist dealing with the killing of his best friend, and a cast of colorful psychiatric patients that served as the suspects. Like Basic Instinct, the film focused on kinks and perversions of all sorts, and seeing as Willis’ character eventually begins to enjoy the company of a free-spirited minx played by Jane March, it had plenty of saucy nudity too. But the trashy erotic thriller craze proved to be short lived, because, despite the fact that Color of Night had a star as big as Willis and tons of twisted content, it only made about $19m domestic compared to Basic Instinct’s $117m. What’s the deal with that?

    Color of Night was just as ridiculous and over-the-top as Basic Instinct. Are you telling me that people got tired of boobs and murders?

    Like

  31. Sharon Stone was one of the only actresses I hoped she would never get old.Even today i dont know why she did intersection and the quick and the dead in her hay days however Casino was her best performance ever.she was good in the last dance as well. I think she really suffered from the late fame and didn’t have a chance to recover her box office bombs.

    Like

  32. Why go to the cinema to see Michael Douglas having simulated sex when you can watch Tommy Anders having real sex for free online?

    Like

  33. The rise and fall of the erotic thriller:
    http://www.denofgeek.us/movies/22017/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-erotic-thriller

    If Fatal Attraction was the erotic thriller genre’s Jaws, then Basic Instinct was its Star Wars. Entirely lacking that earlier film’s attempts at characterisation or emotional complexity, Basic Instinct made a star out of its icy femme fatale Sharon Stone, and took almost $353 million on a $49 million budget.

    Basic Instinct was written by Joe Eszterhas, who rather cheekily, you might say, reworked the plot of his own less successful Jagged Edge (1985). Like Jagged Edge, Basic Instinct is a whodunit with a suspect list with only one name on it: in this case, randy crime novelist Catherine Tramell (Stone) who may or not have stabbed to death a rock star during the final throes of coitus.

    Michael Douglas plays Nick Curran, a hot-blooded cop with an unfortunate taste in V-neck sweaters. His investigations into the Tramell case inevitably end in the suspect’s bedroom, where director Paul Verhoeven regales the viewer with a series of hyper-stylised sex scenes that look like sweaty aerobics videos.

    Assorted sequences of violence and intrigue are splashed across the screen, but these were of secondary importance to Basic Instinct’s graphic set-pieces – one, involving Catherine Tramell and a surprising absence of underwear, was repeatedly freezeframed and lampooned for years afterwards.

    Some critics were unimpressed by Verhoeven’s sensationalistic mix of icy violence and sultry carnality, and the film was harshly criticised by gay rights activists for its content, but like Dressed To Kill years earlier, the controversy merely added to the box-office hysteria.

    What’s more, Basic Instinct taught Hollywood producers an important lesson: to make a hit movie, all you needed was a thriller script, a suggestive title, and a couple of actors with full gym membership and a willingness to take their clothes off.

    In the months after Basic Instinct, only Sliver (1993) came anywhere close to replicating the earlier movie’s success, largely because lead actress Sharon Stone was still a major star – from a critical perspective, the film fared little better than Body Of Evidence.

    The erotic thriller limped on into the 21st century, but movies such as Unfaithful (2002) and In The Cut (2003) did tepid business. The subgenre’s death knell came in 2006 with the belated sequel, Basic Instinct 2. In development hell for years, the resulting film reintroduced Sharon Stone as Catherine Tramell; older, now dwelling in London, and still as dangerous as ever.

    The film was little short of a disaster. Not only did it lack the trashy spark of the original, Basic Instinct 2 was also missing Verhoeven’s sly streak of humour. David Morrissey replaced Michael Douglas as Tramell’s bedroom partner and potential victim, and he seemed ill at ease with the task; his glum, terse performance aptly summed up the dourness of the film as a whole. With Basic Instinct 2, it seemed that even filmmakers had lost interest in erotic thrillers – audiences had, at any rate, if the movie’s flaccid box-office performance is anything to go by.

    In the wake of Basic Instinct 2’s failure, various culprits were fingered as the reason for the erotic thriller’s apparent loss of steam. Some blamed the Internet, with the ready availability of pornography robbing the genre of its mystique. Some even blamed the Republicans.

    Interviewed for a Hollywood Reporter article in 2006, Paul Verhoeven said, “We are living under a government that is constantly hammering out Christian values. And Christianity and sex have never been good friends.”

    In reality, we suspect it was the quality of the movies following Basic Instinct that ultimately undid the erotic thriller, and not George W Bush. Most of the writers who tackled the genre after 1992 were shockingly unimaginative, and seemed content to trot out the same stock whodunit or woman-on-the-rampage plots with little in the way of flair or irony.

    Like

  34. In her case the question is rather “How the hell did she ever become a star in the first place”

    Like

    • Aw, that’s not nice. 😉

      How’d she become a star? She fought tooth and nail. She bared it all. Eventually the perfect role came around at the perfect time. So, basically a lot of kicking and scratching mixed with really good luck.

      Like

  35. The 50 Hottest Bad Actresses Of All Time:
    http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/10/50-hottest-bad-actresses-of-all-time/sharon-stone

    29. Sharon Stone
    Worst Performances: Sphere (1998), Catwoman (2004), Alpha Dog (2006), Basic Instinct 2 (2006)

    If only Sharon Stone could work exclusively with Martin Scorsese. In the acclaimed director’s 1995 masterwork Casino, Stone gave a thunderous performance worthy of the Academy Award nomination she received. Ever since then, though, she’s been the queen of overacting, ineffectively hamming it up as the villain in 2004’s regrettable Catwoman and overselling her worst-mom-ever character in 2006’s Alpha Dog.

    Like

    • Her early performances are pretty bad. Check out Total Recall. Her acting was passable next to Arnold. She got a lot better. I would say she was a talented actress. But it took her a little while to get there.

      Like

    • Sphere had to be difficult for any actress to play. The book version of the character is weird enough. Chrichton seemingly had difficulty with women characters, so he often left them ambiguous. I never saw the movie to see what they did with it.

      Like

      • I never read the book. I watched about half of the movie. It made no sense. No one came across will in it. But it was hardly the actors’ fault. The movie was just a mess.

        Like

    • 10 Awesome Performances From Usually Terrible Actors:
      http://whatculture.com/film/10-awesome-performances-from-usually-terrible-actors.php/10

      Think Sharon Stone in Total Recall, Basic Instinct or Catwoman. Chances are you’ll also think of the word ‘bad’. Forever typecast as a sultry vamp, Stone’s probably never been widely seen as an actress with diverse abilities. That is, apart from Martin Scorsese.

      Scorsese’s women are rarely better-drawn than the men, but Sharon Stone’s Casino role outshines even on-screen husband Robert De Niro through sheer, effervescent brilliance. As Ginger, a headstrong Vegas hooker turned trophy-wife and coke-addled woman on the edge, Stone is unstoppable. Her mood yo-yo’s from one strip of the emotional spectrum to another, giving an unpredictable woman a crazed, over-the-top streak that – crucially – never feels forced. It just fits right into a tale of excess and self-destruction, a heartfelt display from one of American cinema’s sexiest women and, better still, one that looks as though it required no effort. Stone does it all seamlessly.

      Like

      • The Absolute Worst Episodes:
        http://magnum-mania.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2697&start=30#p42346

        I like all the episodes of MPI. All of them except for one. And I HATE this episode.

        I cannot stand the two part episode “Echoes of the Mind.” Honestly, it makes me want to vomit, and my mind refuses to recognize it as part of the MPI library. Oh, I hate so much about it. I could never stand Sharon Stone. I’ve always hated her “hey, I can play a crazy chick” acting approach she uses time and time and time and time and time again in her movies. And, man, does she paint it on heavy in this episode – starting with that terrible opening in the car where her “two selves” are going at it back in forth. Ug.

        The moment I see Thomas and the gang in this episode, I wonder what new writer wrote this piece of work. The characters don’t seem like themselves. I hate how instantly and completely Thomas falls for Diane. I hate how he is shown so heartbroken at the end, and at the start of the next episode he’s looking at the bottom of a bottle for relief – SO NOT THOMAS MAGNUM. ARGH! And is it just me, or does episode seem to leave a rather terrible comment in the end about mental health problems (my own family has dealt with some things, and this episode so makes me cringe).

        There, this post let me get it off my chest. Man, I hate “Echoes of the Mind.” Again, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE all the rest. But DESPISE this two part episode. And Sharon Stone has to be the most over-rated actress in the history of the biz.

        Forgive me if I upset anyone who likes this episode. I never claim to always be right. But I hate this episode!

        Like

  36. She is a great actress, watch the truth here in ‘Inside The Actors Studio – Sharon Stone’ on youtube and that explains all. this article does twist facts, I just read lebeaus other articles on others like Demi M. etc. and many not correct facts.

    Like

    • I will never rule out the possibility I got something wrong. I had to make an update to my Uma Thurman article today. It happens from time to time. But I can’t make corrections if you don’t tell me what is incorrect.

      Having said that, when people pop in here and say articles are factually inaccurate without mentioning specifics, it’s usually because they don’t have any. Don’t be one of those people. Back up your claims. I’ll give your comment a thumbs up to match the one you gave yourself.

      Like

  37. How can a person be considered a “star” if they were in one famous film 22 years ago?

    Like

    • Craig Hansen

      Her stardom could maybe be summed up succinctly with Basic Instinct, but that was such a star-making film for her that it made her a household name and gave her career momentum. Would she have been cast in Casino, and been nominated for an Academy Award, if she had never co-starred alongside Michael Douglas in Basic Instinct? Probably not, honestly. But she continued to gain starring and co-starring roles in films throughout the 90’s. Basic Instinct made her an A list movie star for a few years. At least that’s my take, I’d be interested in hearing what Lebeau has to say about this.

      Like

      • Basic Instinct was undeniably the lynchpin. It single handedly made Stone a star. The fact that she never fully capitalized on that star power doesn’t negate the fact that for a time she was one of Hollywood’s brightest stars. It just means her reign was relatively short.

        Like

    • What’s your definition of a “star”. There have been lots of movie stars who didn’t have a single iconic role like Basic Instinct. Do you think anything today’s actresses are doing will be remembered as well in 22 years?

      Also, you are really selling her career short. She had one truly iconic movie role in a well-reviewed blockbuster movie. A lot of actors will never have anything that approaches that. But she also appeared in several memorable films like Total Recall and Casino. And there are base hits like Quick and the Dead and The Muse. She’s an Oscar and Golden Globe nominee. She’s famous the world over and at her peak was one of the most powerful actors in Hollywood.

      If that isn’t a star, I don’t know what is.

      Like

      • Aw, I like Douglas. I comepletely agree that casting him in those kinds of roles was ridiculous. But then, those were ridiculous movies. And audiences clearly had an appetite for Douglas in those roles.

        As for Stone, I don’t think another role would have suited her as well. After BI, she struggled against her sex symbol image to no avail. It was definitely a double edged sword. Without the role, she never would have been a star. But once she was a star for that role, that’s all anyone wanted from her.

        Like

      • Wayne Treacher

        Douglas won an Oscar for co-producing “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” when he was 31, but his acting career didn’t really hit the big time until he was 40 with “Romancing the Stone”. His career was unusual in that he was already in his forties and fifties when he starred in his most successful films. I can’t really think of anyone else who did that, except John Wayne (although he had become an A-list star in his early thirties with “Stagecoach”, he became a huge star in his early forties with “Red River” and John Ford’s Cavalry Trilogy).

        Like

        • Excellent point. I had this same conversation with someone a long time ago in the comments section of the Kathleen Turner article when I said that Turner was a bigger star than Douglas at the time Romancing the Stone was released. I can think of some character actors who hit it big later in life. But few leading men.

          Like

        • Wayne Treacher

          Can you think of any other Hollywood leading men who became very famous in middle-age? I know there have been cases of British stars becoming successful in Hollywood at that age, like Liam Neeson or Jack Hawkins, but they tend to play supporting roles.

          Like

        • The ones who spring to mind tended to be supporting actors who started getting lead roles. Actors like Samuel L Jackson and Kevin Spacey. Daniel Craig was 38 when he played James Bond. Anthony Hopkins was quite a bit older when he became a A-list. But no, I can’t really think of any Hollywood guys who became A-list actors as middle-aged men. Not to the degree that Douglas did anyway.

          Like

        • Craig Hansen

          I would say Samuel L. Jackson accomplished that. He had done a lot of bit parts and minor supporting roles in films in the late 80’s to mid 90’s, to the point where he was becoming a successful character actor, but then Pulp Fiction hit. Jackson was already 46 by then, and he was able to take advantage of the heat that film gave him to become an A-list star over time. He is one of those rare actors to first become an A-list actor in his 40’s.He’s still a big-name actor in his mid 60’s, another rare feat these days.

          Like

        • The thing about Jackson is that I don’t think he’s really a box office draw on his own. He’s in a lot of movies that make money, he’s well-known and well-liked. But there’s usually something else selling the movie. It’s a Tarrantino movie or a big franchise like Marvel or Star Wars. When Jackson is the main draw (Snakes on a Plane or even Shaft) the movie usually doesn’t do very well.

          Douglas was a huge box office draw.

          Like

        • Charles Bronson is probably another good example of a “late bloomer” type of actor. He was already in his 50s when he made “Death Wish”, which is generally considered the movie that really made him a household name in America (he was already reasonably well known in Europe).

          Like

  38. Whatever Happened To…?:
    http://www.bigthoughtsfromasmallmind.com/2011/06/whatever-happened-to.html

    Easily one of the most iconic actresses of the 90’s, Sharon Stone, has been absent from the big screen since 2006. Sure she has been working steadily since then, but most of the films have played the festival circuit and then went straight to DVD. If you really think about it, she has not had a memorable leading role since the 90’s. Most of her best work, post 90’s, has been in minor supporting roles. I know Stone has had her share of forgettable films, but she is too talented of an actress to be stuck in straight-to-DVD purgatory along with several other memorable 90’s actors and actresses. At only 53 years-old Stone still has plenty to offer as an actress if given the right role. In films like Casino, Broken Flowers, and the Quick and the Dead she demonstrated that she was more than just the sex symbol from Basic Instincts. I know Hollywood is notorious for ignoring an actress the minute they reach age 40, but Stone deserves another shot. I would love to see her reboot her career in a Wes Anderson film or even a reunite with director Jim Jarmusch.

    Career Highlights: Basic Instinct (1992); Total Recall (1990); The Quick and the Dead (1995); Casino (1995); Bobby(2006); Stardust Memories (1980); Broken Flowers (2005); Action Jackson (1988); Above the Law (1988); Diary of a Hitman (1991); Antz (1998); He Said, She Said (1991); The Last Action Hero (1993); The Mighty (1998); Alpha Dog (2006).

    Low Points: Catwoman (2004); Basic Instinct 2 (2006); Sliver (1993); King Solomon’s Mine (1985); Intersection (1994); Sphere (1998); Police Academy 4: Citizen Patrol (1987); Cold Creek Manor (2003); Last Dance (1996); Year of the Gun (1991); The Specialist (1994); Diablolique (1996); Gloria (1999); The Muse (1999).

    Last Seen On The Big Screen: Bobby (2006).

    Where You Will See Her Next?: Waco with Adrien Brody, Kurt Russell and Giovanni Ribisi.

    Like

  39. It’s not like Sharon Stone won’t continue to work. But as Lebeau has charted for her and others in this series, the higher the star, the longer the fall. A couple of days ago I watched ‘I Love You Man” on cable. Enjoyable BTW. Who popped up in the role of the groom’s mother? Jane Curtin! She has worked fairly steadily over the years. For every leading lady or leading man, there have to be either parents, grandparents, etc or other middle aged supporting characters. I submit there is work out there for established actors who are past the sex symbol stage. Of course, I still do think it’s unfair a 50 year old woman is ruled out of a lead role when a 50 year old man would not be. But no one said life is fair.

    Like

    • The best roles for actresses over 40 are on TV. Ask Jessica Lange.

      Like

      • I don’t know about “plenty” of good roles. There aren’t “plenty” of good roles for actresses in their 20s or 30s. Around 40, actresses start transitioning to supporting roles and indies. The lead roles in mainstream movies start to dry up. Competition for those roles is fierce. The indie movies can keep an actress in critics favor and possibly net them some awards, but it’s not the same.

        TV doesn’t have the stigma that it had 20 or even 10 years ago. Lots of actresses are finding better work there than they are in movies. Look at Mary-Louise Parker and Elizabeth Perkins on Weeds. The movies were done with them decades ago. But they have been flourishing on TV. Mira Sorvino is about to start a sitcom and Elisabeth Shue has rebounded on CSI.

        I think if Stone was interested in steady work, she should find a juicy TV role she can really sink her teeth into.

        Like

  40. Lange often returned to act on stage in between movies.

    Stone is a bit like Edward Furlong – they had one huge movie in the early 1990s, then remained famous for no reason.

    Could you do an article about Furlong?

    Like

    • Furlong is an excellent suggestion. Thanks!

      Like

      • Thought this link might interest you. Is it me or do some of the entries in this series look familiar?

        http://www.frontroomcinema.com/frc-fallen-icon-4-ed-furlong/

        Like

        • Funny – there are a few similarly themed series out there. Not surprisingly, we cover a lot of the same subjects. If any of them are seriously getting inspiration from WTHH, that’s cool. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. The only thing that makes me angry is when someone literally copies my stuff on to their site like they wrote it (which has happened believe it or not). My stuff’s not that good. If you’re going to steal, steal something that’s better written.

          Like

        • You’re far too modest!

          Like

        • I hear that from people here. In real life, no one ever says that to me. 😉

          In all seriousness, there isn’t much writing involved in WTHH. The heavy lifting is in research. I do a lot more reading than writing when I put these articles together. A lot of the writing is just repeating the facts I have uncovered. My personal contributions in the form of stray observations make up maybe 1/3 of the article if that.

          But I love compliments. So, thanks!

          Like

        • Hey, a lot of us enjoy your writing style! I too get angry at outright plagiarism, as opposed to inspiration.

          In terms of the way you write, it’s something almost undefinable for me, when a particular writer or columnist or blogger has a certain something that makes me a fan of that style. “Better written” can be very subjective depending on the purpose. If it’s for a scholarly paper then sure a lot of blogs including this one can be picked apart but what is the point in that? So just accept it, your stuff is good!

          Like

        • I try to keep it conversational. Sometimes, I am capable of “better writing”. But this being a blog, I try to write in the most casual style possible. Ideally, it feels like we’re sitting down and talking movies over lunch. Joking around, maybe squabbling, but sharing a love of movies.

          That’s the goal. It’s a pretty easy goal, so hopefully I hit it more often than not. You guys make me think I do.

          It’s the tone that separates all of these different similarly-themed series from one another.

          Like

        • 10 Child Stars Who Spectacularly Self Destructed:
          http://whatculture.com/film/10-child-stars-who-spectacularly-self-destructed.php/6

          5. Edward Furlong

          Here’s one that’s really disappointing. Edward Furlong was superbly cast as the precocious, young John Connor in Terminator 2, such that he seemed destined for a great career as an actor. After starring in a number of not-so-good trashy flicks (namely Pet Cemetery II), Furlong finally lived up to that early promise with a superb performance opposite Edward Norton in Tony Kate’s devastating American History X, but after this it all started to go wrong.

          However, drug and alcohol abuse saw Furlong’s career de-stabilize; he was fired from Terminator 3 despite the role being ready for him on a silver platter, and he began starring in increasingly desperate flicks like a particularly horrible sequel to The Crow, and even an Uwe Boll film called Stoic (though it was admittedly one of the infamously bad director’s “best” films, all things considered).

          Nowadays, Furlong is reportedly destitute, unable to even pay child support, and has refused to go into drug rehab even though it would save him an impending jail sentence. He’s also waiting to be brought up on charges for assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Monica Keena. Sadly, this is one story where I feel like we haven’t heard the worst of it yet.

          Like

  41. I must admit that while Stone was a huge star in the early to mid 90s, I haven’t seen her in anything since Casino.

    Like

  42. See, that’s what I mean. She did struggle with her sex symbol image. She wasn’t interested in movies that played on her Basic Instinct persona, but those were the only roles anyone was interested in seeing her in.

    Did she have a sex scene in Quick and the Dead? I watched it recently and don’t recall one. If she did, it was PG-13 at best. No nudity. The Diabolique story backs that up too. Hollywood wanted steamy sex, she filmed the sex scene without nudity and that got her branded “difficult”.

    She definitely tried to mix it up which unfortunately didn’t work. She chose a lot of the wrong projects. But also, I don’t think anyone was interested in casting her in roles where she wasn’t a femme fatale and audiences weren’t interested in seeing her in those movies. So I fault the system and audiences as much as I do Stone for that.

    Like

    • The sex scene is always included in the TV versions here in the UK. I’m surprised it was cut from the cinema release.

      Like

      • Raimi and Stone decided it wasn’t essential to the movie and agreed to have it cut. The studio re-inserted it for the video release and I guess international versions. Which is understandable. Generally Stone’s movies with nudity were a hit and her movies without nudity were not. I have personally never seen the scene in question. I have only seen the theatrical version (which is Raimi’s version). I can only imagine a sex scene feeling tacked on. But I will withhold judgement until I actually see the international/home video version.

        Like

  43. No one can take Casino away from Stone- she nailed it.

    Problem is – Hollywood doesn’t have a whole lot of femme fatale roles- I guess they don’t test well. In France- she might have had a better career.

    She was not young when she broke out- the clock was ticking for her from day one.

    With no possibility of her getting rom-coms, and with few femme fatale roles in Hollywood- she probably did as well as she could.

    I would have loved to have seen another Casino- maybe I’ll check out Gloria- but I think Gena Rowlands nailed it the first time.

    Like

    • Stone gave a few really strong performances. Casino was one of them. It was no fluke. She just needed more solid material like that. Instead she got a lot of near misses like Gloria, Last Dance and The Quick and the Dead. I have always found her performance in The Muse interesting. She had such a light comic touch which is rarely seen from her. I would have liked to have seen more of that.

      I think the ticking clock was a major factor. She seemed to be racing the clock to make the transition from femme fatale to serious actress. I think that lead her to take some weaker material. She might have done better at the box office if she had kept making steamy movies until her looks gave out.

      Like

  44. Says Stone:

    I feel that it’s so disappointing in films when you see the comforter taped to someone’s chest. It takes you out of the scene and doesn’t protect you from something within the scene….

    It really is the costume of your character. What else are you gonna do? It seems foolish to do something else and if you do something else, that distracts the audience if your inauthentic.

    If you’re inauthentically naked then it’s distracting to the audience when you are naked.

    I think I agree with her.

    Like

  45. I recall being in a crowded theater when the trailer for “THE SPECIALIST” hit the screen…it was maybe the ONLY TIME I heard many audience members actually HISSING at movie trailer (along with scattered laughter too)!!! (This was in rather-liberal San Francisco, where STONE / STALLONE on the big screen was more of a punchline than anything else.)

    Stone was RIVETING in “Casino” but there aren’t too many roles like that for gals Stone’s age…and believe it or not, I thought “Gloria” was actually an OK movie…not a great movie, mind you, but it was OK when I saw it on late-nite “regular” TV. (It was better than “Columbiana” as a femme-led action movie, I’ll say that for it.)

    Maybe she should try for a quality TV series…and by “quality” I mean something like “Law & Order: SVU,” not some dumb sitcom. Maybe Tarantino can put her in one of his movies.

    Like

    • I remember The Specialist being quite popular in the extremely conservative neighborhood I was in at the time. Stallone blew stuff up and Stone had a shower scene. It was everything that audience wanted from a movie. I don’t think anyone even noticed the hammy acting.

      I recently watched Lovelace on Netflix. I was quite impressed with the movie and was surprised it didn’t get a better reception/wider release. Stone plays Lovelace’s conservative mother who insists that she stay with her abusive husband because that’s what she did. It was a really strong performance. I couldn’t place who the actress was until I read the credits. I kept thinking it was Francis McDormand. Stone really disappeared into the character. She’s a better actress than people give her credit for.

      Like

      • re: Stallone blew stuff up and Stone had a shower scene. It was everything that audience wanted from a movie. I don’t think anyone even noticed the hammy acting.

        I know I’m gonna sound like a film snob, but in the malls and multiplexes of America, that’s why many folks go to movies: To see good-looking humanoids blow stuff up good, kiss, and/or get naked.

        re: Stone really disappeared into the character. She’s a better actress than people give her credit for.

        I agree. Like Sly Stallone and Bruce “The Grimace” Willis, Stone can give a great performance when she really wants to.

        Like

        • Agreed all around. And I don’t mind being accused of being a film snob. I’m not, but I can see why fans of The Specialist might think I am.

          Like

  46. Sharon Stone joined Twitter several months back just to let everybody know:
    https://twitter.com/sharonstone

    Like

  47. The primary problem is getting associated with a role of that type at that age which is the cumulative take on it. Although she had been around the business for a while before Basic Instinct, once it hit that was it for her.

    Truthfully, neither Basic Instinct not Fatal Attraction has aged very well. In hindsight it’s easy to see those mainstream erotic thrillers as a late 80s-early 90s fad that was doomed to fade out. Quite a few of them still come out on DVD only nowadays, the last one to get a theatrical release that I remember was Unfaithful. To me, David Lynch’s Blue Velvet is the best erotic thriller of all-time. It’s totally uncompromising features fantastic acting and ends on the best possible note it could. It’s telling in a sense that the best one of all-time was made outside of Hollywood by an independent director. It could be argued that when mainstream Hollywood tries to work in this territory they do it badly (the godawful Never Talk To Strangers is a prime example).

    As for The Specialist, James Woods (What The Hell Happened To Him?) is easily the best thing about it.

    Stone could play dramatic roles if she worked with a director who knows how to draw good performances from her (like Scorsese did in Casino). The problem is, as you noted, many of those attempts were near misses. Last Dance might have done better had it not been released in the wake of the truly brilliant Dead Man Walking.

    Lastly re: Stallone. It’s easy to see The Expendables as what it is, a calculated attempt by him to create a new franchise now that the Rockys and Ramboes are out of steam. It’s easy to forget that prior to reviving both those characters for one last go, Stallone looked like he was about to join Seagal and Van Damme in direct to video purgatory. In fact a few of his early 2000s releases did go right to video. Cop Land showed he could do more ambitious projects. But its box office failure led him to go back to bottom of the barrel action movies like the horrendous Get Carter remake. The sad thing is, he later dismissed Cop Land and claimed it nearly ruined his career. I always thought it was his best performance aside from the original Rocky. As for Demolition Man, I always loved that one. I saw it as a parody of those dystopian future movies of the Blade Runner variety..

    Like

  48. You forgot “Irreconcilable Differences.”

    Like

  49. seeing her guest star in will and grace showed her comic chops she would be good fit for sitcom

    Like

  50. I was just watching Sharon in The Specialist tonight. It’s not great but it’s competently executed and watchable. It’s really a pretty standard Stallone action thriller, but with what I thought were overtones of “Body Heat”–the Miami setting, the vaguely noirish atmosphere, John Barry’s score.

    Reading your summary of Stone’s career as well as the comments, i was reminded of the quote usually attributed to Goldie Hawn (it’s actually a line spoken by her character in First Wives Club): “There are only three ages for women in Hollywood–Babe, District Attorney and Driving Miss Daisy.” Aside from Casino, and maybe one or two other roles, Stone seemed to have some trouble crossing the “Babe threshold.”

    Like

    • That’s a tough transition to make. Especially when your claim to fame is being a sex symbol. Kathleen Turner (since you mentioned Body Heat) was able to make that transition. I think a lot of that had to do with the mainstream success of Romancing the Stone in which she played a mousy romance novelist. But very few other actresses who are so associated with steamy roles are able to do so. In Stone’s case, it’s a shame. Because she developed into a very capable actress.

      Like

      • Yep, Turner definitely had crossed the threshold by the late 1980s. She had a run of great roles that decade. It certainly helped her that she displayed a knack for comedy, black comedy in particular. And then, as I’m sure you know as you did a WTHH piece on her, came rheumatoid arthritis. She’s apparently made a nice transition to becoming more of a stage actress, with multiple Tony nominations.

        Like

    • 15 Forgotten Sex Symbols From The ’90s: Where Are They Now?

      http://www.fame10.com/entertainment/15-forgotten-sex-symbols-from-the-90s-where-are-they-now/12/

      1. Sharon Stone

      Sharon Stone was Hollywood’s newest “It” girl when she played Catherine Tramell, a brilliant, bisexual, alleged serial killer, in “Basic Instinct.” She reportedly found it difficult to maintain her status in Hollywood following her success with “Basic Instinct” and, after her role in “Casino,” she had a string of box-office bombs. While Stone looks as though she hasn’t aged a day since her breakthrough role, her career hasn’t held up and she’s hardly the sex symbol she once was.

      Like

  51. Here’s hoping this article gets the update it deserves! It’s mostly because I can’t see the top photo of her at the beginning of the page by the way.

    Like

  52. Now on Page 4 with only two old commercials of her being added so far. I have to wait and see on what the new and improved story about Stone will be like in the next few days!

    Like

    • Yeah, I threw in the commercials before I lost the links. But there’s lots more coming to this story before I move on. I hope to update picking up where I left off starting tomorrow.

      Like

  53. Sharon Stone will play America’s 1st female vice president on TNT’s “Agent X”:
    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/sharon-stone-drama-agent-x-745536

    TNT has given a straight-to-series 10 episode order for the drama series, which also co-stars Gerald McRaney. Stone will play America’s first female vice president, who soon learns that her job comes with a top-secret duty to protect the Constitution in crisis situations by using a secret operative called “Agent X.”

    Like

  54. Re: Who is Blacklisted in Hollywood and why (bring the tea):
    http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthread.php/832224-Who-is-Blacklisted-in-Hollywood-and-why-(bring-the-tea)?p=20890969&viewfull=1#post20890969

    Sharon Stone was typecast with “Basic Instinct” and most of her roles were for the ‘stone-cold sex machine’ character. Even in “Casino” she plays a similar character. She eventually got too old for those kinds of roles, and she had never really tried branching out to other kinds of un-glamorous roles, so that worked against her too.

    Like

    • Celebs everyone hates working with

      http://www.nickiswift.com/74944/celebs-everyone-hates-working/

      Sharon Stone

      A quarter century later and people are still talking about Sharon Stone’s infamous scene in Basic Instinct (1992), yet she’s arguably failed to recreate that same level of success in recent years. A bad attitude may be to blame. 

      Stone made her Italian film debut in 2014, working with director Pupi Avati and producer Antonio Avati on The Golden Boy (2014). According to The Hollywood Reporter, her diva antics began before she’d even signed on to the film. “It was a negotiation that bordered on ridiculousness, concerning embarrassing details, as if Italy was a third world country,” Avati said. “By the way, we do have electricity in Italy.” Stone’s camp denied the claims.

      The star’s ridiculous demands have allegedly cost her a gig or two along the way, including an invitation to luxury jeweler de Grisogono’s annual party at the Hôtel du Cap-Eden-Roc. A source told Page Six that the actress demanded $300,000, eight hotel rooms for the week, and a private jet. She was ultimately passed up for the job; the appearance opportunity was reportedly given to Kim Kardashian for a pair of earrings, which she may or may not have been able to keep. 

      Like

      • ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 08/10 #9

        https://goo.gl/DMt26d

        This former very brief A+ lister who now basically hits a new charity party every night was so hated on the set of one of her movies that some crew members added more than just water to the tub for her bath scene. Some of them used the tub as their urinal. Sharon Stone (“Sliver”)

        Like

  55. Stone in Top 10 Sexiest Women of the 1990s

    Like

  56. Well, Sharon S starred in a woman-in-prison/on-death-row movie, Last Dance (I think). Unfortunately it bombed. SS was GREAT in Casino but that did not lead to many good movies.

    Like

    • She definitely tried to switch from sex symbol into a serious dramatic actress. An actress (particularly one her age at the time) only gets so many chances to do that. Unfortunately, Stone never did find the right project during her career peak.

      Like

  57. 10 Actors Whose Craziness Got Them Kicked Out Of Hollywood:
    http://whatculture.com/film/10-actors-whose-craziness-got-them-kicked-out-of-hollywood.php/4

    Sharon Stone

    Sharon Stone doesn’t get much work in Hollywood nowadays for two reasons. First off, she’s a female in her fifties, which isn’t exactly the best position to be in in this specific industry, regardless of her mental state. Secondly, she’s batsh*t crazy.

    Yes, Stone’s age is the the least of her problems, given her notorious reputation for being a difficult and – quite frankly – crazy person. Back in the ’90s, at a time when she was deemed to be the hottest woman on the planet, Stone could presumably get away with acting like an insane jerk to everybody. But not these days; times have changed.

    Nope, the woman who once said, “If you’re in a situation where you cannot get out of sex, offer a blow job,” has marked herself as “impossible to work with” through a never-ending parade of crazy incidents, and has succeeded in alienating absolutely everyone in the industry, which means that she hasn’t made anything you’ll recognise since Catwoman.

    Like

  58. Bad Movie Beatdown: Scissors

    Film Brain reviews this gonzo saga of talking birds, twin brothers and (naturally) scissors, starring Sharon Stone.

    Like

  59. Nostalgia Critic: Catwoman

    Catwomen unite against the evils of Halle Berry!

    Like

  60. Nothing happened to her. It is only suggest a fad, is what I feel

    Like

  61. Movie Jail: This week’s defendant is…Sharon Stone!

    http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/movie-jail-this-weeks-defendant-issharon-stone-331

    The Case

    The Prosecution: Border Run, The Burma Conspiracy, Streets of Blood, $5 a Day, The Year of Getting to Know Us, If I Had Known I Was a Genius, Basic Instinct 2, Catwoman, A Different Loyalty, Cold Creek Manor, Picking Up the Pieces, Simpatico, Gloria, Sphere, Last Dance, Diabolique, The Specialist, Intersection, Sliver, Allan Quatermain and the Lost City of Gold, King Solomon’s Mines

    Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Sharon Stone is known worldwide thanks to the infamous leg-crossing scene in Basic Instinct and has a Golden Globe sitting on her mantel for her performance in Casino. The prosecution believes Miss Stone is a talented actress (even though she won a couple of Razzie Awards and some will say she isn’t a particularly strong one), however she’s been punching below her weight as of late in forgettable and poorly-reviewed movies.

    While Catwoman and Basic Instinct 2 obviously didn’t do anything to help her career, in the prosecution’s opinion she should have been able to rebound from those critically-panned flops. But Miss Stone has always had an awful eye for picking movie roles, and in the almost decade since those two bombs, she has appeared in uninteresting and dull films like Border Run, Streets of Blood and $5 a Day. The actress isn’t known for being the most friendly person, which more than likely has something to do with her recent straight-to-Wal-Mart-bin movies, but we feel she could be taking better roles than starring alongside Tom friggin’ Arnold in The Year of Getting to Know Us.

    The prosecution isn;t sure if Miss Stone has been double secret blackballed by Hollywood or if she just needs a new agent, but one thing is for certain: the actress definitely deserves a lengthy stint in Movie Jail.

    The Defense: Fading Gigolo, Lovelace, When a Man Falls in the Forest, Bobby, Alpha Dog, Broken Flowers, Beautiful Joe, The Muse, The Mighty, Casino, The Quick and the Dead, Basic Instinct, Total Recall

    Ladies and gentlemen, my client’s filmography as of late isn’t pretty; there’s no getting around to that. Miss Stone still has some gas in the tank though, and the defense believes she just needs to find the right role to prove she’s still got as an actress, which will help her land more solid movie roles than her recent ones.

    But it hasn’t been that long ago since she delivered a great turn in Alpha Dog, and the defense also thought she was quite good in Fading Gigolo, Lovelace, When a Man Falls in the Forest. Miss Stone hasn’t recently appeared in “big” films, but at least she’s been staying busy, and it’s not like there are a ton of fantastic being written for fifty-seven-year-old actresses.

    If she has been exiled of sorts from Hollywood, it probably has more to do with her notorious reputation than her talents as an actress. My client can be a little difficult to work with and doesn’t always say the smartest things, however it’s not as if she is the first movie star to be a bit of a diva or say dumb things. The defense knows some jury members will want to lock Miss Stone up and throw away the key for her bitchiness and questionable comments, but that’s not the purpose of Movie Jail. Although it could be argued that my client needs to go on probation for her recent output, the defense doesn’t believe a lengthy prison sentence is necessary.

    IN CLOSING…
    What should we do with the sultry and salty actress? Has Miss Stone used up all her goodwill she built up with Basic Instinct and Casino, or do you think she doesn’t belong in Movie Jail? Is Sharon Stone GUILTY or NOT GUILTY?

    WHAT SAY YOU, GUILTY OR NOT?

    Like

  62. Sharon Stone Poses Nude And Gets Candid About Her Life Changing Brain Aneurysm:
    http://uproxx.com/movies/2015/08/sharon-stone-brain-damage-nude/

    In a provocative profile for Harper’s Bazaar, Sharon Stone poses nude and talks about the brain hemorrhage that derailed her career and changed her physically.

    Back in 2001, Stone suffered an aneurysm and then a cerebral hemorrhage that lasted nine days. Worse, she didn’t even realize anything was wrong until three days in, when she went to the hospital and then loss consciousness soon after being admitted. Over the next several days, as doctors struggled to diagnose her condition, things got worse: “I was hemorrhaging so much that my brain had been pushed into the front of my face,” she says.

    Stone is candid in describing how the aneurysm permanently altered her:

    “It took two years for my body just to absorb all the internal bleeding I had,” she says. “It almost feels like my entire DNA changed. My brain isn’t sitting where it used to, my body type changed, and even my food allergies are different.” It took months for her to regain feeling in her left leg and years for her vision to return to normal; she also fought to eliminate a persistent stutter. On the plus side, “I became more emotionally intelligent. I chose to work very hard to open up other parts of my mind. Now I’m stronger. And I can be abrasively direct. That scares people, but I think that’s not my problem.” She laughs. “It’s like, I have brain damage; you’ll just have to deal with it.”

    After the aneurysm, Stone, who rocketed to stardom with 1992’s Basic Instinct and was nominated for a Best Actress Academy Award for Martin Scorcese’s Casino, saw her career fall apart, with a low point being a 2010 guest stint on Law and Order: SVU:

    “That was humiliating,” the actress recalls. “Having worked with the finest people in the industry, I was like, ‘Wow, I’m really at the back of the line here. I’m wearing L’eggs panty hose, and in makeup they start out by putting this white primer on my face.’ I’m like, ‘This is so bad. What did I do to deserve this?’ “

    Soon after though, Stone decided to “shut the f*** up and do the job.” She’s now making a comeback of sorts, starring in and executive producing TNT’s Agent X, in which she plays the Vice President of the United States.

    The entire profile is chock full of Stone’s trademark bluntness, and is worth a read. The artful nudes are also worth a look, of course.

    Like

  63. Sharon Stone Dons Black Hat For ‘Running Wild’:
    http://deadline.com/2015/08/sharon-stone-running-wild-movie-1201501044/

    Sharon Stone is set to star in Running Wild, a drama from ESX Entertainment, the newly launched outfit from Lucas Oil head Forrest Lucas and Ali Afshar. Alex Ranarivelo is directing the film, from a script by Christina Moore and Brian Rudnick. Principal photography begins this week in Napa, CA. The pic centers on Stella Davis, a widow who saves her ranch by working with convicts to rehabilitate a herd of wild horses that wandered on to her property. She must fight prejudice, greed, bureaucracy and vanity –- including her own –- to finally understand that there is no better remedy to misfortune than helping another living creature. Stone will play the baddie role of Meredith.

    Like

  64. I couldn’t think of another actress that worked with Wes Craven that’s on this site (I looked at the list, but maybe I missed a name), but I just wanted to interject my thoughts on his passing. I have to say, I was surprised to hear he passed from brain cancer, which isn’t a disease that happens overnight. Anyway, my two favorite films of his were “A Nightmare on Elm Street” (Rooney Mara was great in…oh, I’m just kidding) and “Deadly Friend” (the studio monkeyed with the screenplay too much, so it probably could’ve been better than it is. It really could’ve been a dark love story).

    Like

    • Neve Campbell is the one of all the performers covered here who I most associate with Craven.

      Like

      • Right on! Swing and a miss for me. Though as the story goes, Mimi craven and Sharon Stone had an affair, which supposedly contributed to the divorce between Wes & Mimi Craven. But yeah, definitely Neve Campbell and the “Scream” franchise, not Wes Craven with Sharon Stone in a bit part in the obscure “Deadly Blessing”:-)

        Like

        • Sharon Stone flirts with lesbianism:
          https://www.datalounge.com/thread/5909961-sharon-stone-flirts-with-lesbianism

          Hollywood beauty Sharon Stone is sick of men who “act like women” and says she would rather be romanced by a “masculine” lady.

          Sharon – who famously played a bisexual serial killer in ‘Basic Instinct’ – said: “Everybody is bisexual to an extent. Now men act like women and it is difficult to have a relationship because I like men in that old-fashioned way. I like masculinity and, in truth, only women do that now.

          “If you go on a date with a woman they call and say, ‘I’m going to pick you up at seven.’ They take you somewhere great and you can dress like a chick.”
          Sharon, 49, also claims she is a big fan of “lesbian sports”.

          She revealed: “I like fishing and golf. I like the boring sports. I also like baseball. I just like a lot of the lesbian sports, I have to say. I’m a little heavy on the loafers – it’s true, if you think about it. I can hit an 80-mile-an-hour hardball.”

          In 2006, Sharon revealed lesbian sex scenes had been cut from her movie ‘Basic Instinct 2’ because they were “too hot”.

          She said: “We shot a menage a trois scene and the girl was really beautiful and hot, this amazing French actress and the ratings board made us take it out. I guess it was too hot.”

          Like

        • That’s funny, since I was thinking of putting in my comment the thought that maybe her Catherine Tramell character was semi-autobiographical.

          Like

        • That’s something I will have to look into when I update this article.

          Like

    • RIP Wes Craven. Your movies brought me hours of entertainment. You will be missed.

      Like

  65. Stone is #1 on WatchMojo’s Top 10 Actresses That Have Appeared Nude in Movies

    Like

  66. Steven Soderbergh’s HBO movie starring Sharon Stone may let viewers decide the ending via app:
    http://www.ew.com/article/2015/09/24/steven-soderbergh-mosaic

    The mysterious project, titled Mosaic, will be filmed with multiple endings, according to EW, and viewers will get to pick an ending via an app. HBO, which hasn’t confirmed the app twist, says the movie “will require a new Emmy category, and we will be the only eligible nominee.”

    Like

  67. Category: This Sucks So Bad … Created on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 17:58 Written by George Rother

    http://www.movieguy247.com/iMovies/index.php/blog/this-sucks-so-bad/1508-allan-quatermain-and-the-lost-city-of-gold

    The tile Allan Quatermain and the Lost City of Gold should be a dead giveaway as to what movie Cannon Films is ripping off this time. Well, the whole movie is a complete rip-off! What an unbelievable piece of crap this is! Compared to this dreary sequel, King Solomon’s Mines looks like Treasure of the Sierra Madre. At least you could laugh at the 1985 original; this one is just plain bad. What really gets my goat about Lost City of Gold is that I made a special effort to see it at the movies. The area theater showing it wasn’t holding it over for a second week and I didn’t want to miss it. I went to see it on its final night while I was sick with some kind of bug. Within ten minutes, I understood why it was leaving after one week. Rarely does a movie this bad see the inside of theaters these days, but back in the dark ages that was the 80s, crap like this regularly made it to theaters. I have no information regarding this film’s budget, but I can presume two things: 1) it wasn’t very much and 2) it didn’t turn a profit. I don’t know what the studio spent on the marketing either. I mention this because I noticed that people refer to the main character as “QUARTERmain” and his name is spelled “QUATERmain” in the ads and in the credits. Wouldn’t that be pronounced “quay-ter-main” as spelled? Where’s the missing “R”? It doesn’t really matter because that’s not the only thing missing from Lost City of Gold.

    What about a decent script? What about any sense of excitement or fun? What about a convincing hero and heroine? Anything that could have made Lost City of Gold entertaining is MIA. What’s left is a drab and dreary grade-Z action/adventure that won’t even please the least demanding viewer.

    This one picks up shortly after the events of the first movie. Allan Q. (Chamberlain, The Thorn Birds) and fiancee Jesse (Stone, Basic Instinct) currently reside in colonial Africa but plan to leave for America soon in order to get married. Naturally, Quatermain is hesitant to make that plunge and finds the perfect excuse to stall when he learns that his brother Robeson (Rabbett) went missing while searching for the legendary lost city of gold. He wants to go look for him and Jesse takes that as a sign that he really doesn’t want to get married at all. She gets pissed off and leaves to catch the ship bound for the US. As expected, she has second thoughts and returns to join her man on his quest. Quatermain and his future wife are joined on their expedition by a fearless axe-wielding warrior named Umslopagaas (Jones, Conan the Barbarian) and a corrupt holy man named Swarma (Donner, Mork & Mindy). Oh great, just we need, more offensive stereotypes! Quatermain and company make their way through many dangers, toils and snares in the jungle before finally reaching their destination. What they find is a city made almost entirely of gold whose inhabitants appear to live in peace and harmony. Well, not everybody is friendly. Certainly not the evil High Priest Agon (Silva, Sharky’s Machine) who serves as ruler. There are also two queens (Chamberlain is NOT one of them!)- Sorais (Peterson aka TV’s Elvira) is bad and Nyleptha (Marson) is good. Oh yeah, I almost forgot, Quatermain’s brother is there too and he couldn’t be happier. It all comes down to our heroes rallying the inhabitants to rise up and defeat Agon and his army with weapons made of gold. Believe me, it’s NOT as thrilling as it sounds.

    It never fails to astound me when a studio releases a picture that they know damn well is a piece of crap. It shows a great deal of contempt for the audience on their part. I realize that nobody ever expected Lost City of Gold to be fine cinema, but couldn’t they have at least tried to make it fun like its predecessor? I mean, how hard would that have been? They shot both movies AT THE SAME TIME! And it’s not like they had a bad director calling the shots. Gary Nelson also helmed the original Freaky Friday, The Black Hole and Jimmy the Kid (a true guilty pleasure!). He and everybody else really dropped the ball in a big way with Lost City of Gold. I absolutely loathe this movie! Chamberlain and Stone are even worse this time around. Is there such a thing as “negative chemistry”? It’s certainly less than the zero chemistry they had in King Solomon’s Mines. Silva gives his usual scenery-chewing performance, but it doesn’t add anything to the dreadful proceedings. As for Mr. Jones, I am ashamed of him. Why would such a dignified actor agree to appear in a movie this bad in such an offensive role? All of the acting is horrendous. The cinematography is ugly. The special effects are extremely cheesy. The dialogue is terrible. The picture is a tremendous bore. It’s not even funny or entertaining by accident. It’s so bad that it will leave the viewer with a nagging headache. I wasn’t feeling well when I went in and Lost City of Gold did nothing to aid in a speedy recovery. I’m well aware that I should have stayed home and rested, but my addiction to movies knows no bounds. Yes, I will watch anything and nothing short of WWIII will prevent me from seeing any given movie. However, a movie as horrible as Lost City of Gold makes me think that I should seek the help of a support group. Is there such a thing as MA (Movies Anonymous)?

    Like

  68. Re: actors who ruined there own careers?

    http://www.imdb.com/board/bd0000007/flat/248824886?d=248868272#248868272

    Basic Instinct didn’t launch Sharon Stone’s career, but it catapulted her to the next level. Stone gambled that, by showing everything (although she claims the infamous crotch shot was filmed without her “consent”), she’d end up on the fast track. It worked. Stone became a hot commodity, although it’s worth noting that only the films in which she had nude scenes met with box office success. Her ability as an actress became eclipsed by her physical attributes.

    Like

    • 15 Difficult Actors That Nobody Wants To Work With

      http://screenrant.com/difficult-actors-nobody-wants-to-work-with/

      SHARON STONE

      Actress, model, and sex symbol, Sharon Stone made her mark in the 1990s, being featured in Paul Verhoeven’s Total Recall and Basic Instinct. This latter film brought her much attention and recognition, and she’d later be seen in Martin Scorsese’s Casino (which netted her an Academy Award nomination). Her work in the 2000s and 2010s has varied from mainstream flops (Catwoman) to more independent but better regarded films (Broken Flowers), as well as the upcoming The Disaster Artist.

      However, Stone does have a bit of a reputation for being demanding. A minor example, but one of the big reasons a sequel to Basic Instinct took so long to get off the ground, was because Stone had disputes with studio execs with regards to its sexual content. A more recent and somewhat infamous example comes from her time on the set of the Italian film A Golden Boy, where she reportedly would go off shopping with the production credit card.

      Like

      • Famous celebs everybody hates working with

        http://www.nickiswift.com/74944/celebs-everyone-hates-working/

        A quarter century later and people are still talking about Sharon Stone’s infamous scene in Basic Instinct (1992), yet she’s arguably failed to recreate that same level of success in recent years. A bad attitude may be to blame. 

        Stone made her Italian film debut in 2014, working with director Pupi Avati and producer Antonio Avati on The Golden Boy (2014). According to The Hollywood Reporter, her diva antics began before she’d even signed on to the film. “It was a negotiation that bordered on ridiculousness, concerning embarrassing details, as if Italy was a third world country,” Avati said. “By the way, we do have electricity in Italy.” Stone’s camp denied the claims.

        The star’s ridiculous demands have allegedly cost her a gig or two along the way, including an invitation to luxury jeweler de Grisogono’s annual party at the Hôtel du Cap-Eden-Roc. A source told Page Six that the actress demanded $300,000, eight hotel rooms for the week, and a private jet. She was ultimately passed up for the job; the appearance opportunity was reportedly given to Kim Kardashian for a pair of earrings, which she may or may not have been able to keep. 

        Like

  69. Sharon Stone to play a Hollywood agent in The Disaster Room https://t.co/XpomLYJ9MV

    Like

  70. 15 Movie Stars Who Peaked in the ’90s

    http://screenrant.com/best-movie-stars-peaked-in-the-90s/?view=all

    SHARON STONE

    Typically cast as the meek ingenue or the woeful housewife in the ’80s, it took a villainous turn in Total Recall (1990) to solidify Sharon Stone as a flirtatious force of nature. The film’s director, Paul Verhoeven, took note and expanded upon this image with Basic Instinct (1992), casting Stone as a manipulative murder suspect that made her the hottest thing in Hollywood. Forever remembered as the bisexual flirt who bewitched Michael Douglas, the actress’ unflinching portrayal became the stuff of leg-crossing legend. Award-worthy acclaim soon followed through Martin Scorsese’s Casino (1995), showcasing dramatic chops that only added to leading roles in The Quick & The Dead (1995) and The Mighty (1998).

    Unfortunately, being a sex symbol has a shelf life, and diminishing offers coupled with ill-fated choices like Cold Creek Manor (2003) and Catwoman (2004) made matters even worse. By the time Stone copped a Golden Raspberry nom for Basic Instinct 2 (2006), the fall from grace was all but complete. A definite shame, but given how unsexy Instinct 2 turned out, fans would be far better off sticking to the glory days.

    Like

    • 15 Actors Who Desperately Need A Hit

      http://whatculture.com/film/15-actors-who-desperately-need-a-hit?page=13

      Sharon Stone

      Almost immediately after Sharon Stone was nominated for a Best Actress Oscar for 1995’s Casino, her career fell off a cliff from which it’s never really recovered.

      The only remote box office hit she’s had since is Jim Jarmusch’s Broken Flowers, a far cry from her string of commercial smashes in the 1990s, namely Total Recall, Basic Instinct, Sliver, The Specialist and Casino, which collectively grossed over $1 billion worldwide.

      Stone’s career downturn is more indicative of the difficult place in Hollywood for middle-aged women, considering that Stone’s a terrific actress and has taken care of herself looks-wise.

      With rumors swirling that she may appear in the upcoming Ant-Man and the Wasp, she’d almost definitely end up with the biggest box office hit of her career to date. Here’s to hoping.

      Like

  71. 9 Iconic Movie Characters Who Appeared Outside Their Franchises

    http://whatculture.com/film-tv/9-iconic-movie-characters-who-appeared-outside-their-franchises?page=3

    Catherine Tramell – Last Action Hero

    Sharon Stone became a modern day femme fatale thanks to Basic Instinct, which also featured the most famous leg crossing scene in the history of cinema. The legacy of the character was somewhat tainted by the daffy sequel over a decade later, but this role will always remain her most famous.

    A year after Basic Instinct the character made a genuine blink and you’ll miss it appearance in Arnie’s action parody Last Action Hero, where she can be seen lighting up a cigarette outside a police station. She can’t actually be seen smoking it though; the movie was PG-13.

    This little appearance was used to underline the “reality” of the movie, where characters from just about every genre can cross over and meet with each other. In fact, just a moment later Robert Patrick’s T-1000 can be seen exiting the same police station.

    Speaking of which…

    Like

  72. Sharon Stone Teases a ‘Wee Part’ in an Upcoming Marvel Movie

    http://screenrant.com/sharon-stone-marvel-movie-role/

    Sharon Stone teases a small role in an upcoming Marvel movie, though the actress doesn’t name the film and remains vague on specifics.

    Like

  73. Sharon Stone and Lindsay Lohan on WatchMojo’s Top 10 Celebrity Comeback Fails

    Like

    • I got sick of Limp Bizkit pretty quick, shortly after their cover of George Michaels’ “Faith” (I liked it, but my interest in them was already fading). I don’t know, Fred Durst just rubbed me the wrong way. I’d rather listen to Goldfinger or Timbuk3.

      Like

  74. Sharon Stone interviewed by CNN’s “Richard Quest”

    Like

  75. Sharon Stone — My Alleged Stalker’s Hitting Me Up For Guns & Diamonds

    https://t.co/19pWloJ1b1

    Like

  76. The problem was that Stone already looked 35 in “Basic Instinct”.

    Like

    • Yeah, she was a late bloomer (she plays “Basic Instinct” at 25, things are different), sex appeal was her calling card (even in the 1980’s), and she wasn’t taken seriously for her acting (kind of a shame there, since I thought she was always pretty good) and this = Sharon Stone. Hollywood should embrace her though, since it seems she’s a real deal Hollywood flake (I mean that in a good way). Heck, she’s like the Prom Queen of Hollywood flakes.

      Like

      • “Actressy” actresses

        https://www.datalounge.com/thread/17941394–actressy-actresses

        A reporter from the NY Times once called Sharon Stone an “actressy actress” when she met her for an interview and it wasn’t a compliment. Some director was talking about Meryl Streep and rolled his eyes and said, “That’s Streep being Streep,” which sounded like the same thing. Who else is actressy every moment of the day?
        —Anonymous (323 views)

        22 replies 17 hours ago

        Like

      • Career bombed because she was born in the wrong era

        http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000232/board/flat/255806827?d=255806827#255806827

        Sharon Stone always seemed to me to be a throwback to the cool, calm and sophisticated blonde starlet of the 1950s and ’60s (think: Grace Kelly, Janet Leigh, Faye Dunaway or Kim Novak). I think that if she had been working back then, she would’ve had a decent career appearing as the love interest in capers opposite leading men like Paul Newman and Steve McQueen.

        But she emerged in the late 1980s and unfortunately, this was the era where if an actress was seen as a sexpot, the only thing she was good for was appearing in nude and graphic sex scenes. I think this is why her career pretty much bombed in the 1990s. She was born in the wrong era.

        Wed May 18 2016 11:04:06

        I agree that she has a classical beauty, like this perfect blonde type of actress, but Basic Instinct basically launched her career and without it she wouldn’t even be on the map. When she starred in basic instinct she was already 32 which gave her a really late start and she could only play the sex god for so long..Plus her one-dimensional acting didn’t help her at all she was only good at playing mysterious, grumpy whores and not any other roles, like she was plain horrible in Sliver, Specialist and Intersection with Richard Gere..Her one-dimensional acting didn’t help her much either plus she had a personality issue working with multiple directors..

        But I agree, she had this goddess vibe, like Nicole Kidman, Charlize Theron, or Kim Basinger, but all of them had a much better career than hers ’cause they are more versatile..

        Like

        • Is The Erotic Thriller Dead?

          http://decider.com/2015/08/06/is-the-erotic-thriller-dead/

          First, fewer actresses market themselves as femmes fatales in this century, and every erotic thriller needs one. This isn’t to suggest there aren’t any: Jennifer Lawrence took a stab at it in Serena, and Anne Hathaway’s Hitchockian turn in The Dark Knight Rises proves she has the chops for it. But it seems like contemporary leading actresses would rather establish themselves as action superstars, strong leaders, or comic dazzlers than as seductresses. No one’s aiming to capture the world’s attention the way Kathleen Turner did with her debut in Body Heat, or Linda Fiorentino with her starmaking turn in The Last Seduction. Frankly, this isn’t a bad thing–the very idea of the “femme fatale” is a bit dated–but it means fewer starlets to cast.

          Like

    • She made the most out of her short career as a star, which only lasted about 6 years. She was very prolific and took every mainstream movie she could get until no more were offered. Beautiful Joe was her first post Basic Instinct movie not to have a theatrical release. After that she took a break since she didn’t have much to lose.

      Like

    • Sharon Stone in that regard, was kind of like Rene Russo. What I mean is that like Sharon, it’s safe to say that Rene Russo was also a “late bloomer” type of actress. Russo didn’t start making movies until she was 35. The only difference is that it’s kind of debate ether or not Rene Russo during her prime was ever truly A-list (“Buddy” was the only movie that she did in which she was unquestionably “the star”) or just a “star by association”/fixture/glorified supporting actress.

      Like

      • I suppose Rene Russo was never A-list, but I still feel she maybe didn’t get enough due for being a strong performer.

        Like

      • Russo made good choices in her career. A star? I wouldn’t go that far. But she was well known. Comparable to Angie Dickinson during the 60s when Dickinson was popping up in a lot of studio films as a supporting actress or second lead (with the occasional nondescript starring role here and there.)

        Someone else here said Stone’s biggest problem was that she looked the age she was, and I agree. There’s even a line in Sliver where she says “I’m 35, not 25!” She was only five years older than Billy Baldwin, but the script alludes to their age gap.

        In contrast, when Kim Basinger was mid to late 30s, she could pass herself off as a “girl” in movies like Blind Date and The Marrying Man. If she was a few years older than her leading man, which she often was, no one seemed to notice. They certainly didn’t mention it.

        Stone was always a “woman”, never a girl, if you get what I mean. It has nothing to do with aging, just the type of face she has. Like, no one would ever describe her as “waif-like.”

        Like

  77. Will We Ever See Another “Basic Instinct” (not a remake)?

    http://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/638628-will-we-ever-see-another-basic-instinct-not-remake.html

    Thinking back to 1992 when this movie was released, there are a lot of aspects to this studio movie you never see anymore when it comes to erotic thrillers.

    -A list talent and Oscar winning actor Michael Douglas in the lead.

    -Auteur director Paul Verhoeven given a lot of creative control.

    -Graphic sex, violence, nudity, and homosexuality (not graphic, but pretty in your face with its presentation) .

    -A pretty large budget considering the content ($49 million, which probably approaches $100 million today).

    -An original screenplay not based on a pre-existing property.

    Please don’t point to the “50 Shades” movies, it’s a pre-existing property, and their content does not come close to Basic Instinct in terms of risque material.

    Like

    • The life and death of the American erotic thriller

      http://entertainment.inquirer.net/204245/the-life-and-death-of-the-american-erotic-thriller

      Paul Verhoeven’s sleazy but sexy whodunnit “Basic Instinct” took the erotic thriller downmarket in 1992 but became one of the biggest hits of the decade, grossing $353 million worldwide.

      The movie — about a novelist who stabs her victims with an ice pick while engaged in acrobatic sex acts — famously featured an interrogation scene in which Sharon Stone crosses and uncrosses her legs to reveal she isn’t wearing any underwear.

      “If ‘Fatal Attraction’ was the erotic thriller genre’s ‘Jaws,’ then ‘Basic Instinct’ was its ‘Star Wars,’” writes Ryan Lambie of the film reviews website Den of Geek.

      Conservative values

      The film led an upsurge of erotic thrillers, with cult hit “Poison Ivy,” Stone’s next film “Sliver,” Madonna’s “Body of Evidence” and “Disclosure,” all cashing in on the public’s appetite for sex and death.

      But a succession of lower quality erotic thrillers bombed at the box office as apathy for the genre set in.

      In 1996, Wes Craven’s smart, self-referential slasher movie “Scream” opened the floodgates for a slew of ironic, postmodern thrillers, often with big stars but almost no nudity.

      Audiences had come to expect more from their serial killers than bodice-ripping bonking by the time the much delayed critical and box office disaster “Basic Instinct 2” came out in 2006.

      Some analysts have blamed the rise of internet pornography for stripping erotic thrillers of their mystique while others claim a resurgence in conservative values following the election of US President George W Bush in 2001 finished off the genre.

      Shawn Robbins, a senior analyst at BoxOffice.com, believes the erotic thriller died out simply because the world moved on, as it always does.

      “I think this is largely due to a cyclical shift in cultural tastes, especially among thriller and horror fans,” he told AFP.

      “Certain genres tend to follow — or set — trends for a certain era, and in recent years those have gravitated toward more supernatural and psychological scare tactics.”/rga

      Like

  78. ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 04/26 #8

    https://goo.gl/If8Xt6

    At this point in her charity work, she has done so many events that the former flash in the pan from the flash of her legs A+ lister now says the same speech and just changes the disease and the name. She also likes the checks to be in five figures. Sharon Stone

    Like

  79. Actors who are banned from China

    http://www.looper.com/66446/actors-banned-china/

    Sharon Stone

    Sharon Stone was talking to the press at the 2008 Cannes Film festival when she started making comments about the deadly Sichuan Earthquake of that year. These weren’t nice comments about helping with the disaster. Instead, she shared her belief that the earthquake was the result of bad karma built up by the Chinese for oppressing the Dalai Lama. Bad move. 

    The earthquake wasn’t just some minor thing that did a bit of damage, it killed close to 90,000 people. And there was Stone, talking about how it was probably cosmic retribution. That’s shockingly insensitive. Even if she believed that the Chinese had treated the Dalai Lama wrong, that is definitely not an excuse to write off 90,000 deaths as cosmic revenge. 

    In a move that surprised no one except probably Stone herself, the Chinese got mad and banned all of her movies from China. Oddly, it looks like they didn’t ban Stone herself, but at this point she might as well have been. Nobody in China who recognizes her will be very nice, even though she says she is sorry for the comments.

    Like

  80. Sharon Stone pens heartfelt response to old Madonna letter calling her “mediocre” http://huffp.st/n5c6pXg

    Like

  81. Stone wouldn’t become a star in the modern world because a film like “Basic Instinct” would never be made today. The Internet and TV porn channels have killed off sex in movies.

    Like

  82. “Basic Instinct” is definitely the most stupid film ever made. The police would have used DNA to prove Catherine was having sex with Johnny Boz when he was murdered. Anyway Michael Douglas was far too old to play Nick.

    Like

  83. Sharon Stone Basic Instinct screen test

    https://www.datalounge.com/thread/19424639-sharon-stone-basic-instinct-screen-test

    Paul Verhoeven supposedly hired her after noticing her ability to turn it on/off, hot to cold, in a second, in ‘Total Recall’. Watch this.

    —Anonymous

    reply 66 hours ago

    Sharon is and was gorgeous but I’d say that Grace Kelly was in a different category. Sharon is the beautiful dream girl next door while Grace was an untouchable angel.

    Peak Charlize is right up there with peak Sharon.

    —Anonymous

    reply 8 6 hours ago

    Say what you will about Sharon but she was amazing in Basic Instinct. Sexy, funny, icy, bitchy, confident, dangerous. I love everything about her performance and that is an awesome screen test. You can even tell Verhoeven is bewitched by her. She owned that movie. Elizabeth Berkley probably thought Showgirls was going to give her the same stardom Basic Instinct gave Stone, but Berkley took the role too seriously, whereas Stone had a lot of fun in the role.

    I’m a little surprised Stone had to audition for Verhoeven considering they had just worked together on Total Recall but it was a sought-after part in Hollywood. But nobody could have played it better than Stone.

    —Anonymous

    reply 10 5 hours ago

    The Catherine character in BI is tough and smart so the audience likes her. The Nomi character in Showgirls is an aggressive idiot so the audience either laughs at her or dismisses her.

    —Anonymous

    reply 12 5 hours ago

    Like

  84. Why Was Sharon Stone A-List In The 90s When She Never Had A HIT MOVIE?

    https://www.datalounge.com/thread/19565836

    Other than Basic Instinct, Sharon Stone never had a hit movie.

    So why was she A-List with tons of scripts heading her way in the 90s?
    —Anonymous (1137 views)

    128 replies 125 12 hours ago

    I think Casino did okay

    —Anonymous

    reply 1 12 hours ago

    Despite an Oscar nod, that was a flop too

    —Anonymous

    reply 2 12 hours ago

    She also was 36 when she hit it big so that limited her choices

    —Anonymous

    reply 6 12 hours ago

    I believe THAT movie she did with Michael Douglas actually was a hit but I can’t remember the name.
    Yes 1 movie, and she was A-List in the 90s despite never having another hit movie. Why?

    —Anonymous

    reply 7 12 hours ago

    Because Basic Instinct was huge. But they tried again with films like Sliver and they just did not work for her

    —Anonymous

    reply 8 12 hours ago

    Her snatch was A-list. This was before the internet and the fappening

    —Anonymous

    reply 9 12 hours ago

    She had a lot of glamour and they hoped to recapture the Basic Instinct magic. But all of her follow up projects were not so great. And then she turned 40 which is 80 in Hollywood years.

    —Anonymous

    reply 10 12 hours ago

    Same a Meg Ryan I guess. She only had 2 hit films (When Harry Met Sally & Sleepless In Seattle) yet she was A List for YEARS, and turned down tons of projects. And what she did was flops. Her last successful film was “You’ve Got Mail” which is approaching its 20th Anniversary!

    —Anonymous

    reply 11 12 hours ago

    Yes [R8]. Sharon Stone has a magic p***y– just like Amber Herd. Magic pussies automatically get a 3-picture deal.

    —Anonymous

    reply 12 12 hours ago

    Sharon is also a nut case. Her bad b.o. mixed with bad personality…no one wanted to hire her.

    —Anonymous

    reply 13 12 hours ago

    Because “Casino” was a movie for its time – worshipping Cocaine, Grifting, Violence. Because she spread ’em for the males in “Basic Instincts” that glorified Violence, subtle lesbianism. Cheap shots all. The deciding factor was that she was a creation of the tail end of “Hollywood Studio Days” the last house sponsored Diva to Graduate from the studio machine. She was the last.

    —Anonymous

    reply 14 11 hours ago

    Last Dance, directed by Bruce Beresford, was her “Barbra Streisand in Nuts” attempt at an Oscar nomination. She also did Diabolique the same year. Instead of an Oscar nomination, she was actually nominated for a Razzie for Worst New Star for both films, as “the new serious Sharon Stone”. Ouch.

    —Anonymous

    reply 15 12 hours ago

    OP, prior to BASIC INSTINCT, Sharon was in TOTAL RECALL, also directed by Paul Verhoeven

    The crappy film was a hit. There was buzz about Sharon being a ‘it’ girl. The rest is history

    —Anonymous

    reply 16 12 hours ago

    Amber Heard reminds of Sharon, minus the personality and breakout role. Most movie stars in Hollywood are lucky to get a 5 year run, then they retire or go to TV.

    —Anonymous

    reply 17 12 hours ago

    If you were to ask people who the female lead in Total Recall no one would be able to answer.

    —Anonymous

    reply 19 12 hours ago

    After Basic Instinct throughout the 90s Sharon Stone graced all the magazine covers, got sit down interviews on Late Night TV (even appearing on the Barbara Walters Oscar special) and YEARLY appearances on the Oscars from 1992 to 2000

    All that for just one movie, Basic Instinct?

    —Anonymous

    reply 20 12 hours ago

    She had the hit with basic instinct but I think what made her considered a-list was her PR team. They had her in every magazine and at every party. She wore the men’s Gap shirt to the Oscars, that got ALL the publicity that year. “I just saw this today and threw it on” riiiiiiight.

    —Anonymous

    reply 21 12 hours ago

    Most of her post BI films did fail… I remember reading a GQ article on her and she came across as thirsty and basically told the reporter that she worked hard to make it to where she was and that she “wasn’t leaving”.

    —Anonymous

    reply 22 11 hours ago

    I remember when Barbara Walters asked her about being 35 and she cringed. She knew her time was limited

    —Anonymous

    reply 24 11 hours ago

    [R21] has it. She was marketed as a “fashion icon” and got some publicity from that, she was a tabloid target for a while, too

    —Anonymous

    reply 25 11 hours ago

    BTW Sandra Bullock hit it big with the film “Speed” when she was 30, and followed it up with two box office hits “The Net” & “While You Were Sleeping” at age 31

    —Anonymous

    reply 27 11 hours ago

    There was no female lead in Total Recall. If you had to choose one, it would more likely be Rachel Ticotin over Sharon Stone, but both were supporting roles in an ARNOLD movie.

    —Anonymous

    reply 28 11 hours ago

    [R28] which is the total point, those roles were so insignificant that it is unfair to label it a “Sharon Stone” movie

    —Anonymous

    reply 29 11 hours ago

    She might have had more luck under the studio system. With modern Hollywood you have to be bankable and she was not. It’s actually worse now than it was in the 80’s with the proliferation of comic book films. Young pretty types are wanted and they are over by 35. At least she was given a chance

    —Anonymous

    reply 30 11 hours ago

    “Basic Instinct” was a hit INTERNATIONALLY so that helped. But let’s face it, she was really famous for being the first star to spread her legs on camera. (She was good in “Casino” though).

    —Anonymous

    reply 33 11 hours ago

    I loved her in Casino. That’s a movie I have watched many times. Basic Instinct, no — and I’m a lesbian! Just didn’t like it.

    —Anonymous

    reply 34 11 hours ago

    Sharon was and is beautiful and is aging very well. Unlike Meg “fish lips” Ryan.

    She also has a great personality. She gave a great performance in Casino.

    —Anonymous

    reply 35 11 hours ago

    Well she showed pubic hair. Let’s be honest. Look, she hit late, when she did she was lightning in a bottle and as short lived. The international crowd loved her Hollywood loved her and her embrace of the “movie star”. She was beautiful, smart and controversial. She definitely filled a niche for that time-period when there were few gorgeous it girls with a bit of talent.

    —Anonymous

    reply 36 11 hours ago

    Sharon’s A-List ranking was largely a publicity-fueled stardom. One top-grossing movie catapulted her to the top, but good PR sustained her for quite some time, despite appearing in flop after flop, and developing a bad reputation on the set. She played the game, making herself available for interviews and cover stories, attending red carpet events in full Hollywood glamour girl drag, headlining AmFar events, etc. A lot of the credit goes to her publicists for keeping her name out there and landing her those PR gigs.

    —Anonymous

    reply 37 11 hours ago

    She was great in Irreconcilable Differences. Not bad in The Mighty.

    —Anonymous

    reply 38 11 hours ago

    Sharon was a beautiful and a good actress. She was apparently a bitch on set, so she killed her own career.

    —Anonymous

    reply 39 11 hours ago

    Wasn’t there a 1995 Gun Western type film that she did with Leonardo Di Caprio that was a hit?

    I remember being really keen to see her film The Muse in 1999 and being disappointed at how underwhelming it was.

    —Anonymous

    reply 40 11 hours ago

    I think it is really unrealistic to think she could be a big star in her 40’s. She was glamorous but cold, and audiences were not into her acting

    —Anonymous

    reply 41 11 hours ago

    Cate Blanchett is a big star in her 40s

    —Anonymous

    reply 42 11 hours ago

    Right, but she has acting range and Sharon does … not. Cate is also more of an art house darling than a big box office star.

    —Anonymous

    reply 44 11 hours ago

    [R44] exactly Sharon chose mainstream trashy roles

    —Anonymous

    reply 45 11 hours ago

    if you’re too young to remember, you should know that when Basic Instinct came out she was HUGE. It was one of the biggest A star is Born moment in the history of Hollywood. That massive thing alone sustained for at least 4-5 years after BI. And she was funny, brazen and controversial in every interview. I think the problem was that there weren’t many larger-than-life woman roles for her, so she made a lot of wrong choices. She’s quite talented, IMO. But she really shines in big crazy parts like in BI and Casino.

    —Anonymous

    reply 47 11 hours ago

    When I first saw her on screen in Basic Instinct, my jaw dropped. She was a better-looking, more-talented Madonna. I looked around the theatre wondering whether or not everyone was thinking the same thing.

    It seemed so obvious, and the timing of her making a huge impact when and how she did played a big part in her being shoved to the front of the film star class.

    She was the Madonna of the film world – something Madonna wanted desperately to be, but couldn’t back up – Sharon filled that lucrative slot.

    I also wondered (perhaps DL sleuths would know) if this was when Greta Scacchi fled town, rejecting the sexy, ice queen mold Hollywood was fashioning for her.

    Greta preferred Merchant-Ivory type stuff.

    When Sharon showed up, did Greta see the writing on the wall? Or did Sharon only have a shot because Greta said “Thanks, but no thanks?”

    —Enquiring minds, and all.

    reply 49 10 hours ago

    I recall stories that crew members peed in any hot tub or bath tub that she had to do scenes in. Her run was basically age 35-40.

    —Anonymous

    reply 50 10 hours ago

    [R49], I remember one critic commenting that she played Madonna better than Madonna. Ironically, Madonna ended up doing Body of Evidence, which tried to capitalize on the Basic Instinct sexual thriller heat, but only ended up proving that Madonna was no Sharon Stone.

    —Anonymous

    reply 52 10 hours ago

    [R40] I loved her in Muse. I would watch that first of a SS marathon and probably not bother watching anything else.

    I think she got a lot of mileage from having f***ed around a lot pre-BI with powerful people (i.e., Joel Silver). Someone would have to confirm this though as it was just gossip from around that time.

    —Anonymous

    reply 54 10 hours ago

    Wasn’t there a 1995 Gun Western type film that she did with Leonardo Di Caprio that was a hit?
    That was a FLOP as well

    —Anonymous

    reply 56 10 hours ago

    Let’s not forget her remake of “Gloria” that TANKED at the box office flop as well.

    —Anonymous

    reply 58 10 hours ago

    I don’t know if it’s true but a friend in LA told me she faked that brain injury story for cheap publicity. The x-rays and everything…faked. Just like Angelina and her Bell’s Palsy.

    —Anonymous

    reply 59 10 hours ago

    I love her. She was gorgeous when most starlets were merely cute.

    —Anonymous

    reply 60 10 hours ago

    Sharon Stone in her Oscar Bait performance as trailer trash inmate on death row in Last Dance

    —Anonymous

    reply 61 10 hours ago

    i remember reading an interview before BI, maybe around the time of Total Recall. She said she basically came from trash, and that her parents sent away at first chance (modeling) because her brother was a small time criminal and they wanted to saver her from being sucked in that world.

    —Anonymous

    reply 62 10 hours ago

    When I first saw Basic Instinct I remember thinking that this is the kind of role that Theresa Russell would have done when few others would have touched it (mainly because of the open-snatched interrogation scene). Like Stone, Russell is/was a terrible actress, and she certainly would have fit the part physically.

    —Anonymous

    reply 64 10 hours ago

    [R50], Joe Eszterhasz revealed that tidbit in his book, “Hollywood Animals.” He also said about La Stone, “we used to have a saying among us at the agency. ‘Put Sharon Stone in the room alone with the director and she’ll close the deal.'”

    —Anonymous

    reply 65 10 hours ago

    She was/is so pretty but she you can only go so far with one note acting performances. Madonna, Sharon, Demi … they were unlivable and mostly flat on screen with a few exceptions. And if you are a bitch in real life, then you really are done at 40. There is someone right behind you who is younger, cheaper and easier to work with

    —Madeline Stowe

    reply 66 9 hours ago

    And if you are a bitch in real life, then you really are done at 40.
    Indeed.

    —F. Dunaway. Born 1941, filmed Mommie Dearest 1981

    reply 68 9 hours ago

    I think she first got attention for Irreconcilable Differences. Shelly Long, Ryan O’Neal as a pair of married screenwriters, Drew Barrymore their kids. Long played the starlet Ryan O’Neal had an affair with and then left his wife for. She was very funny. She went from sort of an earthy, faux ingenuous, European style sexy bohemian to a shrill movie star-wannabe who starred in a remake of Gone with The Wind (as a musical). She was pretty and funny in that. It got her opportunities. She also was a fashion icon for awhile, as already said.

    —Anonymous

    reply 71 9 hours ago

    Didn’t Michelle Pfeiffer only have one hit (Dangerous Minds)? Everything else was co-star. It’s harder for women, especially if they lack frau appeal.

    —Anonymous

    reply 72 9 hours ago

    I always found Sharon trashy, distasteful and nothing like me, I, myself. That’s why America picked me to love. Now I have another trashy, distasteful Millennial of all things trying to take my crown.

    —Miss Julia, America’s Sweetie 1.0

    reply 74 9 hours ago

    Is Jennifer Lawrence the Sharon Stone of this decade? Except positive critical acclaim with less sexiness?

    —just askin

    reply 76 9 hours ago

    My hero, Robert Evans, despised her for saying she would not meet with him anywhere not pubic because a friend of hers had been chained by a dog collar and kept hostage for months in his house. Total bulls***., of course. Despite her rather studied persona of being smart, her true nutty shit came to the surface pretty fast — and things like breaking up the marriage of one of her producers didn’t help.

    But, really, if she was a great enough actress, all would have been forgiven. She wasn’t.

    —Anonymous

    reply 83 8 hours ago

    JLAW for some reason has been given the label of great actress. I find her plain and amateur but she is the most in demand. Julia lost her crown a long time ago. She was eclipsed by Sandra Bullock and then JLAW.

    Bullock is hoping Ocean’s 8 next year shows she can still be box office in her 50’s. Sharon would be good in a TV series. Maybe as Kay Scarpetta or some kind of a detective

    —Anonymous

    reply 84 8 hours ago

    Sharon. At the time of the filming and release of BI, she’d proven herself to the forward-thinking ingénue of her day. According to the BI screenwriter, Joe Eszterhas, (who’d later written “American Rhapsody, a detailed expose on his life as a successful Hollywood screenwriter). La Stone had hooked up with one of the movie’s producers, who was also one of the producers of her follow-up film, Sliver, the then married Bill MacDonald.

    Long story, short: Eszterhas married MacDonald’s ex-wife, Naomi.

    Though he’d subsequently left his career in Hollywood, due to health reasons (throat cancer), it’s apparent (in his book) lovely Sharon was a ‘Mean Girl,’ taking and using anything at her disposal.

    (In his book he also provides juicy behind-the-scene details about Showgirls (he was the film’s screenwriter) and the casting of Elizabeth Berkley as its lead character, “Nomi,” which was his nickname for his new bride, the former Naomi MacDonald.)

    —Anonymous

    reply 85 8 hours ago

    Stone had some awful show on TNT about a year ago. In this age of Prestige TV, she will never get anything like gold standard HBO backing her. She burned a lot of bridges and is not talented enough for people to overlook that. Skip some of the photo shoots and parties and work on your craft.

    —Anonymous

    reply 87 8 hours ago

    I actually liked her in “The Muse” but, then, she was basically playing herself.

    —Anonymous

    reply 88 8 hours ago

    She could play the villain in one of those superhero movies. No real range required and she’d look great in the costumes.

    —Anonymous

    reply 89 7 hours ago

    1994’s “The Specialist” was a HUGE hit
    No it was another FLOP

    —Anonymous

    reply 94 7 hours ago

    Don’t forget, in that whining Madonna letter that was up for auction recently (then retracted) M said Sharon Stone was having the film career she (M) deserved. Hahahaha, stupid Madonna was envious of Sharon Stone because SS is more beautiful, was popular for explicit “sexiness” (M thought she’d cornered that market) and appeared to have a hot film career ahead of her. That letter made public must have embarrassed both of them. D’oh!

    —Miss Gulch

    reply 98 6 hours ago

    I would guess that Sharon’s 1992 “Basic Instinct”s mega-success and Faux Lesbianism in it caused Madonna to ramp up the graphic sex and Faux Lesbianism in her SEX book to come out later in 1992, as well as the album EROTICA.

    Madonna was chasing Sharon’s success.

    —Anonymous

    reply 99 6 hours ago

    Kathleen Turner was, is and always shall be 100x the actress that Sharon Stone never was. And Kathleen had more than a few classic movies to her name. She was my favorite star of the ’80s, bar none, especially in “Crimes of Passion” and, later, “War of the Roses”.

    —Anonymous

    reply 103 6 hours ago

    Agree. Sharon can be entertaining as a kook but she is a B actress at best. Kathleen also had that successful theatrical run of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolfe

    —Anonymous

    reply 104 6 hours ago

    I too have never understood why Sharon Stone is considered a movie superstar. Everything she’s in automatically flops

    —Anonymous

    reply 112 4 hours ago

    I really enjoyed her performances in The Muse and Casino. She’s very good with odd men: Albert Brooks and James Woods. Maybe it’s because she’s odd herself? I heard she was also good in The Mighty, but I haven’t seen that one. She definitely would have benefited from the studio system of the 30s and 40s. I thought the treatment of Stone on the Casino set was very telling, in an ugly way, about Scorsese.

    —Anonymous

    reply 117 4 hours ago

    [R117], maybe Sharon Stone was the 90s answer to Cybil Shepherd? Or maybe I’m just pulling at straws here. When reading your post, I started thinking about the days when Cybil was attractive and she was in Taxi Driver.

    —Anonymous

    reply 118 4 hours ago

    If you want to see a truly sad misguided attempt at an Oscar nomination, watch Sharon Stone playing frumpy middle-aged mother in “Lovelace”. Oh, how The Mighty have fallen (see what I did there?)

    —Anonymous

    reply 120 3 hours ago

    P.S. It’s sad because she obviously would’ve been a strong contender to play Linda Lovelace herself and probably would’ve done a much better job (had there been a better script anyway). Instead, she is stuck in the thankless role of her MOTHER? And not even a fun abusive Mo’neeq good Mother role. Just a snooze for the most part.

    —Anonymous

    reply 121 3 hours ago

    It’s really too bad Sharon was not cast as Joan Crawford in Feud. She is the right age and could easily look like Joan with makeup. Sharon is definitely in her mom phase and I wish her well.

    —Anonymous

    reply 125 3 hours ago

    Casino, Basic Instinct and The Muse were probably the only times that she really acted well, with Casino being the best performance-actually a great one.

    —Anonymous

    reply 129 35 minutes ago

    Like

    • https://www.datalounge.com/thread/19565836-why-was-sharon-stone-a-list-in-the-90s-when-she-never-had-a-hit-movie-

      Her ‘acting’ reminds me so much of Joan Crawford’s: incredibly phony; though I think Crawford could be more convincing, probably because her phoniness had a desperate, people-pleasing quality to it, whereas Stone always comes across as smug. They were both at their best when they were playing shallow and callous and not attempting to be earnest.

      —Anonymous

      reply 161 Yesterday at 3:04 AM

      Greta Scacchi said way back around the time of Presumed Innocent that the reason she came to Hollywood in the first place was because she kept losing roles she wanted due to not being a name. She’d been in art house hits, so she’d come to the attention of various industry people, but it would come down to her and somebody more famous, and she’d lose out. The directors wanted her for the parts but the studios would say no. So taking on all these mainstream projects was an attempt to get over that. But she wasn’t able to turn her Presumed Innocent success into the kind of status she wanted, and around that time she became pregnant by Vincent D’onofrio, with whom she had a tumultuous relationship and a custody battle that apparently left her depressed and f***ed up for several years. Then I think her priorities realigned with motherhood and she just went back to doing her art house/British TV thing.

      —Anonymous

      reply 162 Yesterday at 3:11 AM

      It was also annoying when she did that coy victim thing once “Basic Instinct” was released — saying she was “tricked” into doing that shot. Didn’t know the camera was down there. Even Kirstie Alley made fun of her on some late night show, imitating how the light guy has a measuring tape up to Stone’s “triangle” and she doesn’t know they are shooting down there?

      All that talk about how that shot was about empowerment (bulls*** in and of itself) and then Stone acts like some abused schoolgirl. When I knew she was a bit nuts.

      —Anonymous

      reply 167 a day ago

      SS claims Paul Verhoven told her the white panties were causing a glare on the camera. He promised her there would be no beaver in the shot. This story always seemed dubious to me, since she was wearing a white dress. I think she knew her bare crotch would be in the film and did not care. It catapulted her to fame but limited her career choices.

      —Anonymous

      reply 180 15 hours ago

      Interesting screen test. You can tell that she had a ton of presence in it, even if her acting was just okay.

      —Anonymous

      reply 181 14 hours ago

      I like Stone but I can’t disagree with the OP. It always felt like people were waiting for Stone to have a hit or another iconic role like Basic Instinct and it never happened. Sliver had a great soundtrack but it was marred by reshoots and people weren’t interested. The Specialist did okay but it’s barely remembered. She was great as the conniving, shrewish wife in Casino but there wasn’t much after.

      —Anonymous

      reply 186 11 hours ago

      Heat and Dust came out in 1983, and Merchant-Ivory films always got attention and admiration from Hollywood directors and creative types. Then in 1987 she had three films back-to-back that got a lot of the film festival sort of attention that the industry takes note of: White Mischief, Good Morning Babylon and Diane Kurys’ A Man in Love. So she was probably getting brought up in casting meetings for a while, even though it wasn’t materializing into roles for her.

      The relationship and child with her first cousin came long after Presumed Innocent, when she had already sort of taken herself off the Hollywood radar. I think they’re still together too.

      One of my favorite films of hers is Salt On Our Skin (released in the US as Desire). A beautiful love story, worth seeking out if you’re a fan.

      —Anonymous

      reply 189 9 hours ago

      I think she would have had a longer career had she taken more comedic roles. She became a sex symbol at 34, the half life on that was bound to be short – and she never got beyond the type even though she’s proven she can do more.

      All that said, Interesection is one of the most laughable trying to be serous movies ever. But Stone and Gere are capable of being quite terrible and boy were they ever.

      —Anonymous

      reply 190 9 hours ago

      I’ve been watching some of her 80s b-movies again (Tears in the Rain, Sleeping Dogs) and it’s fascinating how she elevates the mediocre material. She just had a classiness, a regal quality that sets her apart. I guess back in the days that she was hungry she still had plenty to prove.

      Would be interesting to guess how her career might have panned out if not for Basic Instinct, as she was already starting to get more tasty, showier roles that were well suited to her in films like Scissors and Diary of a Hit Man.

      —Anonymous

      reply 194 3 hours ago

      Like

    • What actor / actress is due for a comeback?

      https://www.datalounge.com/thread/19841522-what-actor-actress-is-due-for-a-comeback-

      Sharon Stone. She seems to get stuck doing bad genre stuff. She seemed to look better and be more appealing in funny stuff like The Practice and The Muse.

      —Anonymous

      reply 16 Last Tuesday at 7:17 PM

      And Sharon Stone has done some terrific character work recently. She was (IMHO) the best thing in LOVELACE as the title character’s mother.

      —Anonymous

      reply 35 Last Tuesday at 8:43 PM

      Like

  85. ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 09/06 #7

    https://goo.gl/Xq3g3o

    This former flash in the pan A+ list mostly movie actress who lives by name recognition alone at this point had to pay her own way to a possible yachting commitment. The appointment comes courtesy of this just about permanent A list mostly movie actress who rarely acts any longer. Sharon Stone (Melanie Griffith)

    Like

  86. Sharon Stone details harrowing journey following a stroke in 2001 http://thr.cm/1ZWLWw

    Like

  87. ‘I barely have time to bathe!’ Sharon Stone, 59, ‘refuses to go under the knife’ but admits using ‘great creams’

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-5041021/Sharon-Stone-59-refuses-knife.html

    ‘And of course I eat healthily’

    Like

  88. She’s clearly has cosmetic surgery.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: