What the Hell Happened to Renee Zellweger?

Renee Zellweger

Renee Zellweger

Renee Zellweger has won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress, she was nominated twice for Best Actress and she has won three Golden Globes.  For roughly a decade, she topped the A-list with both critical acclaim and commercial success.  But she has been missing from the big screen for the last several years.

What the hell happened?

Rene Zellweger - Dazed and Confused - 1993

Renee Zellweger – Dazed and Confused – 1993

Zellweger started acting in TV movies like A Taste for Killing in 1992 and the mini-series Murder in the Heartland in 1993.  She had uncredited roles in the zombie rom-com, My Boyfriend’s Back and the 70’s high school comedy, Dazed and Confused (pictured above) in 1993.

zellwegger - reality bites

Renee Zellweger – Reality Bites – 1994

In 1994, Zellweger appeared in Reality Bites as one of Ethan Hawke’s girl friends.  The picture above is pretty much the sum total of her part.  She gives the slacker heart-throb a kiss on the porch and is never seen or heard from again.  She was little more than an extra, but it was her first credited role in a Hollywood movie.

zellwegger - 8 seconds

Renee Zellweger – 8 Seconds – 1994

One week after the wide release of Reality Bites, Zellweger had a slightly larger role in Luke Perry’s bull-riding bio-pic, 8 Seconds.  The film was Perry last grasp at transitioning from TV star to the big screen.  Despite mostly negative reviews it was a small hit at the box office in relation to its modest budget.

Later that year, Zellweger starred in the Showtime movie, Shake Rattle and Roll.  SR&R was part of a series of remakes of 1950’s B-movies that Showtime produced under the title Rebel Highway.  The idea was to give drive-in movies a “90’s edge”.    Series creator, Samuel Z. Arkoff wondered “what it would be like if you made Rebel Without a Cause today. It would be more lurid, sexier, and much more dangerous, and you definitely would have had Natalie Wood’s top off”.

The clip above includes footage from several of Zellweger’s movies from 1994 set to a song from Shake Rattle and Roll.

zellweger - texas chainsaw massacre

Renee Zellweger – The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre – 1994

Just about every successful actress in Hollywood has a horror film in their early days they wish they could make go away.  For Zellweger, that film is The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

The low-budget sequel starred Texas natives Zellweger and Matthew McConaughey who were both unknowns at the time.  Zellweger played the girl in peril and McConaughey went way, way, way over-the-top as the next generation cannibal who terrorizes her.

In spite of the presence of two future stars, The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre was terrible even by the standards of a low-budget horror sequel.  It got dumped in a few theaters in 1994 and was screen at the South by South-west Film and Media Conference in 1995.

In 1997, when Zellweger and McConaughey were both rising stars, it was re-edited and released under the title Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation.  McConaughey actively campaigned to prevent the film from getting a wide release.  And with good reason.  His performance is laughable.

Reviews were almost unanimously negative.  McConaughey successfully blocked the film from getting a wide release.  It opened in just 20 cities in 1997 before being dumped to video.

Next: Empire Records and Jerry Maguire

Posted on February 23, 2013, in Movies, What the Hell Happened?, WTHH Actress and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 195 Comments.

  1. rennes movie with Keanu could be a hit with renes age she could be do mother roles instead of rom coms but aside iron man movies she making flops u mentioned u might make diane lane a caudate on wthh happened yet she is starring in the the 2nd superman movie so she cant be doing to a bad it is a form flattery but at same it mentions how damage there career is at the moment

    Like

  2. on the other hand laws like paltrow is appearing in the box office hits Sherlock holms and like paltrow they were supporting roles but I guess like u said before women are held different standards since its rare they actually lead a box office hit

    Like

  3. Well, even if she looks like Kelly Lynch 2.0, if the film interests me, we’ll see. Besides, I liked it when she was a star:-)

    Like

  4. Zellweger makes the list of WatchMojo’s Top 10 Actors Who Walked Away from Fame

    Like

    • 40 Stars Who Vanished Without a Trace From Hollywood

      http://newravel.com/20-stars-who-vanished-without-a-trace-from-hollywood/9/

      Renée Zellweger

      In 2014 Renée Zellweger turned heads at the annual Elle Magazine Women in Hollywood Awards – leading to speculation that she’d had extensive plastic surgery during the self-imposed hiatus she’d been on since 2010’s My Own Love Song. Still, with The Whole Truth due out later this year and two movies scheduled for release in 2016, Zellweger is now well and truly on the comeback trail.

      Like

      • What happened to Renée Zellweger?

        She’s very talented, but she didn’t shape her career in the right way. She got huge around 96, then got huge (acclaim) with Bridget Jones. From there she was the critics/awards darling for a little while, but, as is often the case with actresses, once they awarded (winning the Oscar for Cold Mountain) the industry lost interest. Here next couple awards plays mostly flopped (Cinderella Man, Miss Potter), which all but killed her career. With actresses, you usually don’t do well to follow up an Oscar win with more Oscar-y prestige stuff. You have to balance that with wider-appealing, blockbustery type stuff. The second Bridget Jones didn’t get the same success, and most of her other projects were the awardsy stuff that weren’t going to reach a wide audience.

        She could always make a comeback in a couple more years, but she peaked at a terrible age where the roles for actresses start to dry up. She might have better luck in her 50’s/60’s cause we don’t yet know who the dominant actress in her generation will be at that age.

        Like

  5. Patrick Dempsey Joining ‘Bridget Jones’s Baby’ For Working Title:
    http://deadline.com/2015/09/patrick-dempsey-bridget-jones-baby-working-title-renee-zellweger-colin-firth-1201519501/

    EXCLUSIVE: Patrick Dempsey is in final negotiations to join the cast of Bridget Jones’s Baby for British production powerhouse Working Title co-chiefs Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner. The much-anticipated third installment sees Renee Zellweger reprising her role as the mishap-prone British publishing executive as she enters her 40s. Colin Firth also returns as love interest Mark Darcy.

    Plot details are being kept under wraps, including which role Dempsey will be playing, although, as the title suggests, Bridget Jones does find herself unexpectedly expecting. Less clear at this stage is if and when the father’s identity will be revealed, leaving open the possibility that Dempsey — TV’s own (former) Doctor McDreamy — could play a love rival in a similar vein to Hugh Grant’s dashing Daniel Cleaver. Grant is not returning for this, although director Sharon Maguire, who helmed the first Bridget Jones’s Diary in 2001, will be at the helm again.

    The story is believed to be based on columns written by Bridget Jones creator Helen Fielding and not her latest novel, Mad About The Boy (in which the titular character has a couple of kids and Firth’s character has died).

    Like

  6. Category: This Sucks So Bad … Created on Saturday, 05 January 2013 17:04 Written by George Rother

    http://www.movieguy247.com/iMovies/index.php/blog/this-sucks-so-bad/1117-texas-chainsaw-massacre-the-next-generation

    The only thing that saves Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation from a “NO STARS!!!” rating is a delightfully demented performance from Matthew McConaughey. They can keep the rest of this awful movie! Originally titled The Return of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, it was completed in ’94 but didn’t see the inside of movie theaters until late summer ’97. By this time, both McConaughey and Renee Zellweger had become big stars and the producers saw an opportunity to separate moviegoers from their hard-earned money. They needn’t have bothered since very few people took the bait. I have a memory for this sort of thing (as everybody knows by now) and I know that TCM4 (as I like to call it) didn’t open in any theaters in the Philadelphia area. I would have been one of the poor dumb bastards who paid to see it. I admit it, I’m a sucker when it comes to horror movie sequels. As long as the studios keep churning them out, I’ll go to see them. I saw it when it hit home video; I stayed up late one night to watch it. It totally wasn’t worth being tired at work the next day. This movie sucks hard! Not only does it lack any memorably gory scenes, it also throws in a subplot that’s so ludicrous that it has to be seen to be believed. This is NOT an endorsement of TCM4! I do NOT recommend seeing it under any circumstances! By nature, this type of flick is usually stupid and pointless, but with the aforementioned subplot, it attains a level of stupidity that very few movies have achieved.

    This is in addition to the super-annoying, one-dimensional characters and horrible dialogue. I know that I shouldn’t apply the traditional principles of film criticism to a movie like this, but I feel obligated to point them out in this instance. It’s that kind of movie.

    As if it even matters, here now is the “plot” of TCM4. I use the term very loosely since I didn’t notice any perceivable storyline. I’m still on the fence as to whether I should reveal the ridiculous subplot; I suppose that I should as a service to mankind. More about that in a moment. The movie opens with four insipid teenagers at their senior prom. They’re so annoying that I wanted them dead seven minutes into the movie. Nerdy Jenny (Zellweger, Jerry Maguire) attends the prom with her boyfriend Sean (Harrison) and bickering couple Barry (Cone) and Heather (Newmyer). She’s pissed off that she caught him making out with his ex-girlfriend and drives off in his car with Jenny and Sean in the backseat. He manages to jump in and they head out towards some unknown destination. They end up getting into an accident approximately two minutes after Heather expresses a desire to get into a car wreck. This leads to a particularly stupid line where Barry says, upon inspecting the damage to his vehicle, “I’m dead. Somebody kill me please!” Can we say “redundancy”? The driver of the other car falls down unconscious and Sean stays behind with him while the others go looking for help. At this point, Jenny removes her heels and foot fetishists will appreciate that she spends the rest of the movie barefoot. They come across an insurance office where the lone agent Darla (Perensky) calls for a tow truck. Let me remind you of the rule that states that everybody horror movie characters encounter in a remote area are inevitably related to each other. The tow truck is driven by her husband Vilmer (McConaughey, A Time to Kill) and he’s a real loony tune! He kills the other driver and goes after Sean, prompting the boy to plead, “Please mister, you’re scaring me.” Yeah, that always works. Meanwhile, Barry and Heather get separated from Jenny and come across a house occupied by …… you guessed it! They encounter our old friend Leatherface (Jacks) and the nightmare really begins. There are no surprises here; you know exactly what’s going to happen next. Virginal Jenny will eventually be their “guest of honor” at dinner. Now, here comes that subplot. It turns out that Vilmer works for a super-secret government agency and the murders are all part of a bigger plan. The whole situation is intended to be a “spiritual experience”. Huh? We get only a vague explanation of this, but we don’t need to know very much to figure out that it’s completely moronic. Then there’s the deus ex machina in the final scene, but who wants to get into that?

    TCM4 is really, really bad on every single level. It’s so bad that it doesn’t even qualify as camp. I can’t believe that the studio even released it. Did anybody even inspect the final product before it hit theaters? Whatever happened to quality control? This movie would have likely faded into obscurity if not for the presence of the two major actors. I’m sure that they both leave this movie off their resumes on purpose for much the same reason that Angelina Jolie omits any mention of her role in Cyborg 2. It’s a complete embarrassment for all involved. I can’t believe that Kim Henkel, one of the original’s co-writers, is responsible for this. The only saving grace (still no reason to watch it!) is McConaughey. I don’t know what it is about that guy, but he brings something cool to even the worst roles. He gets to go full-on freak show in this movie. I wish that were enough to save TCM4, but it’s not. It doesn’t even come close to making this travesty watchable. The other performances don’t even matter; they are terrible across the board. I didn’t even like the guy playing Leatherface in this movie. That brings up another problem with the movie. For something with the word “chainsaw” in the tile, there’s a curious lack of chainsaw-inflicted violence. It’s not even that gory. It’s violent and nasty, but there’s nothing to satisfy even the most undemanding gorehounds. The term “waste of time” comes to mind. So does “waste of film”. It’s the cinematic equivalent of solid waste. It’s possible that TCM4 would have worked if the filmmakers had added more gory violence. Oh yeah, I almost forgot, Grandpa (Schirmacher) makes his fourth appearance in as many movies and I have to wonder just how old is this geezer? In the first movie, he’s supposedly 137 years old and he must have earned himself a place in the Guiness Book of World Records by now. You would think that the writer would have addressed this at some point. I’m just saying. Either way, nothing really makes any sense in TCM4 and we can only hold out hope that Henkel will clear things up in a better sequel. I’m not holding my breath though.

    Like

  7. she has a film with keanu coming up a drama called same kind of different as me lastly bridghet jones flick. These films could a hit . I see bridget jones being safest bet

    Like

  8. Blockbuster Buster: Shark Tale (2004)

    ERod faces what many claim is the worst DreamWorks animated movie.

    Like

  9. 15 Actors Stuck In Hollywood’s Dog House

    http://whatculture.com/film/15-actors-stuck-in-hollywoods-dog-house.php/15

    Reneé Zellweger

    What has gone wrong? Another that falls under the “did you know she was still working?” banner, Zellweger really did have the Hollywood world at her proverbial feet. A superb supporting role in the epic Cold Mountain brought her an Academy Award and a BAFTA following previous nominations for Bridget Jones’ Diary and Chicago, leading to massive box office in the early 2000’s.

    Almost overnight, though, Zellweger plunged from the heights of the A-list, to the depths of the Z-list. Offers were not forthcoming and she seemed to disappear altogether. You know you’re in trouble when a career hiatus is forced upon you.

    So What Next?

    Well, there is another Bridget Jones film on the way but there really is little else in her cinematic future. Zellweger desperately needs a role she can get stuck into. Maybe a script Julianne Moore doesn’t quite fancy could be the answer, and one that would generate some much needed credibility.

    Like

  10. Renee Zellweger

    She was doing so well and hit every womans struggle niche market.

    Went and had plastic surgery and destroyed every single one of her unique features that really made her stand out in the crowd. Haven’t seen her since.

    Like

  11. Where Are They Now? The Cast Of Empire Records

    http://screenrant.com/empire-records-where-are-they-now/?view=all

    Renee Zellweger (Gina)

    Brassy, confident Gina revealed that she wasn’t quite as confident as everyone thought in an epic Empire meltdown that was the most emotional part of the film. Post-Empire, Zellweger shot to A-list stardom, becoming one of the biggest names of the next ten years. She became best known for the smash-hit rom com series Bridget Jones Diary, alongside other huge hits like Jerry Maguire, Chicago, and Cinderella Man. She won an Oscar for her performance in Cold Mountain, and was nominated for two more (for other films).

    She has won a further 24 awards, including a BAFTA and three Golden Globes. However, a few years ago she took a hiatus from the acting world after some less-than-stellar movies. She has since returned to the limelight with a new look that shocked many fans, although the star brushed it off as just part of getting older. She’ll be back in a familiar role later this year, though, as Bridget Jones’s Baby comes to screens to complete the Bridget Jones trilogy.

    Like

  12. Phelous: Case 39 (2010)

    Phelous is put on the case on why this movie was delayed for four years.

    Like

  13. Where Are They Now? The Cast Of Jerry Maguire

    http://screenrant.com/where-are-they-now-jerry-maguire/?view=all

    RENÉE ZELLWEGER (DOROTHY BOYD)

    Dorothy Boyd portrayed the level-headed, yet at times impulsive love interest to the titular Jerry Maguire. When Jerry decided that he is going to start his own sports management firm, Dorothy impetuously agrees to join Maguire without really knowing him all too well, and with little regard to her financial well-being along with best interest of her young son Ray. She was a woman that (up until Jerry entered the picture) always took the sensible path and generally chose to be responsible well beyond her years.

    Between the years of 2001 and 2004, there was arguably no actress hotter in Hollywood than Renée Zellweger. In three consecutive years, Zellweger was nominated for Best Actress – twice in a leading role, once as a supporting actress – and finally took home the gold statue for her portrayal of Ruby Thewes in Anthony Minghella’s directorial effort, Cold Mountain. The Oscar winning actress has been on a bit of a hiatus from film over the past six years or so, but it appears as though a comeback is in the works, with two motion pictures slated for release in 2016 – director Courtney Hunt’s sophomore effort entitled, The Whole Truth, and the latest installment of the Bridget Jones series, Bridget Jones’s Baby.

    Like

  14. She’s done it again! Renee Zellweger, 46, is unrecognizable as she sports fuller lips and wrinkle-free face on coffee run in LA

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3606010/Renee-Zellweger-46-unrecognizable-sports-fuller-lips-wrinkle-free-face-coffee-run-LA.html

    Like

  15. RENEE ZELLWEGER ON LEAVING HOLLYWOOD: “I GOT SICK OF THE SOUND OF MY OWN VOICE”

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/renee-zellweger-covers-british-vogue-899846?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_1056065

    I’s been six years since Oscar-winning actress Renee Zellweger has appeared in a film, but her just-released fresh, floral British Vogue cover makes it feel like no time at all has passed. The July issue, shot by Patrick Demarchelier, serves as a sort of announcement that she is indeed stepping back in the spotlight.

    In the accompanying interview, the 47-year-old Bridget Jones actress — who stars in Bridget Jones’s Baby this September — reveals why she took a hiatus from Hollywood in the first place. “I found anonymity, so I could have exchanges with people on a human level and be seen and heard, not be defined by this image that precedes me when I walk into a room,” she told the magazine, adding, “You cannot be a good storyteller if you don’t have life experiences, and you can’t relate to people.”

    Her most famous role, though, has always been fairly relatable to women, even as she caught flak in 2014 for a seemingly altered appearance. For this new movie, she says, “I put on a few pounds. I also put on some breasts and a baby bump. Bridget is a perfectly normal weight and I’ve never understood why it matters so much. No male actor would get such scrutiny if he did the same thing for a role.”

    The issue, which hits stands June 9, also explains that she said no to once-in-a-lifetime projects during her break, but that fatigue had caught up with her and she had to make tough decisions. Also, “I got sick of the sound of my own voice: it was time to go away and grow up a bit.”

    Like

  16. What It’s Like To Be An Actress On The ‘Wrong’ Side Of 40

    http://uproxx.com/movies/opinion-what-its-like-to-be-an-actress-over-40/

    Last week, the highly regarded Variety film critic Owen Gleiberman wrote about Renée Zellweger’s appearance, and how he thought she’d lost her essential self through plastic surgery. He hardly mentioned her magnificent range, vulnerability, or the kindness that shines through her acting. Instead he chose to focus on the idea that, “In the case of Renée Zellweger, it may look to a great many people like something more than an elaborate makeup job has taken place, but we can’t say for sure.” So perhaps it shouldn’t be said at all.

    Like

    • She looks a hell of a lot better since the plastic surgery. If she had done this 10 years ago the uproar would not have existed. Only the tabloids would’ve had the audacity to point it out.

      Like

      • She looks like one would think now, but she did look pretty different before (I called her Kelly Lynch 2.0), and I don’t exactly buy her explanation that her face looked different because she wasn’t wearing makeup at that film event.

        Like

  17. Renee Zellweger slams speculation about her appearance in powerful op-ed: http://usm.ag/2b0ySyO

    Like

  18. Since we are on topic zellwegger . Do you guys agree that her chicago costar gere part was more supporting role and his golden globe should been best supportign actor

    Like

    • Yes, I consider it a supporting role for Richard Gere, and Catherine Zeta-Jones and Renee Zellweger as co-leads, but it’s been discussed on here that the studios gets a little creative with performer categorization petitioning (like Rooney Mara’s categorical placement for “Carol”), or since abbreviations are so popular, PCP.

      Like

  19. I understand . there other cases where i think supporting actor gets best actor nod. I thought denzel in training day morgan freeman and shawshank michael douglas wall street and daniel day leiws where all supporting roles

    Like

    • I think of Denzel Washington as a co-lead in “Training Day”, but since there is no category for co-lead, I’m glad he got an Oscar, since I felt his performance was dynamic there (he oozed evil charm, and was very seductive).

      Like

  20. It seemed to revolve more around hawke. I know there are movies with 2 leads like midnight cowboy rainman trading places a lot of buddy cop movies and rom comedies. and sixth sense but training day hawke was the main character trying get away from denzel. the movie was kind of seen through hawke eye. Denzel was amazing but he sohuld won best supporting actor not actor

    Like

    • The more I think about it, I see the “Training Day” main cast setup similar to that of “Face/Off” with Travolta & Cage. In that film, one character is a good guy, the other bad, but they’re co-leads. Sure, in “Training Day” the audience is more or less placed in the shoes of Hawke’s character, with Washington’s character the devil tapping you on the shoulder, but Washington’s character propels the plot forward. With another cop Hawke’s character may just be getting a survey of the streets, and not dealing with so many heated circumstances. I still believe they are co-leads, because I see a supporting performer as someone who pops in and out of the picture, not a total constant who the film revolves around.

      Like

  21. thne your probaly think douglas was colead in wall street

    Like

    • I think his role teeters towards co-lead a little due to his prominence in the film, but since “Wall Street” ends with Bud Fox, while Gekko’s fate is undertermined (unlike how things play out in”Training Day”), I’ll call Douglas a supporting role, just barely.

      Like

  22. Michael douglas was more a evil mentor role like the devil on his shoulder. I KNOW again there are roles with co leads but wallstreeet training day and gangs of new york not one of them i judge lead and supporting role by plot . if plot revolves more around 1 character then other i call actor main.

    Like

    • I’ll say this: Sean Connery’s character in “The Untouchables” is clearly a supporting role, with no grey area involved whatsoever:-).

      Like

  23. defiantly untouchables was costner flick. He was leader of group he organized everything he was the danny ocean. I REMEMBER READING jack nichsol got golden globe for best actor in comedy for batman, I thought that odd lol since keaton was clearly the lead in the role hence the name batman, While joker was supporting he was the villian. Which exact reason i thought daniel day lewis for mre supporting in gangs of new york it revolved around leo the hero taking down the villain. The villain in a lot of movie is supporting role hence hackman role in unforgiven,

    Like

    • Yeah, that’s the downside of playing Batman, is that if the villain(s) is/are well-written, they’re going to have more onscreen flavor. With the 1989 film, you throw in Jack Nicholson, who usually takes roles and runs with them (like he did in 1987’s “Witches of Eastwick” another definite supporting performance with 3 co-leads:-), poor Michael Keaton didn’t stand a chance while in costume (and we all know that Keaton has the ability & flair to take over when its called for).

      Like

  24. The exception of the hero and villain being lead and supporting was obviously face off. Since the plot equally revolved around cage and john . In some cases some actor are marketed as supporting to avoid competing with their costar. Like jake from brokeback. Tom cruise i was read was campaigned for supporting in rianman even though he was defiantly co lead. It did not pay off since he got snubbed

    Like

  25. Renée Zellweger on her return to Hollywood: ‘I craved the creative process again’ http://peoplem.ag/blu5Zl1

    Like

  26. Renée Zellweger says she doesn’t need to have kids to be happy: http://celeb.bz/2c2JxsM

    Like

  27. The REAL reason my face looked so different: Renee Zellweger – back as Bridget Jones after 12 years – explains away those cosmetic surgery rumors

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3770052/The-REAL-reason-face-looked-different-Renee-Zellweger-Bridget-Jones-12-years-explains-away-cosmetic-surgery-rumours.html

    Like

  28. Cast Of Bridget Jones’s Diary: How Much Are They Worth Now?

    http://www.fame10.com/entertainment/cast-of-bridget-joness-diary-how-much-are-they-worth-now/?streamview=all

    Renee Zellweger

    Estimated Net Worth: $60 million. Renee Zellweger is one of the most successful actresses in Hollywood. Back in 2007 she was deemed one of the highest paid actresses and has received critical acclaim for her work including an Academy Award, three Golden Globes and three Screen Actors Guild Awards. Zellweger focuses primarily on film, but she has worked on the small screen. She was the executive producer for the Lifetime film Living Proof and appeared in a few TV films. Her real success is on the big screen where she’s most recognized for her role as Bridget Jones in the all three of the Bridget Jones’s Diary films. She starred in and was the executive producer for Miss Potter which also earned her a Golden Globe nomination, and held co-starring roles in huge projects like Cold Mountain, Me, Myself & Irene, Cinderella Man, Case 39, Chicago, Appaloosa, Jerry Maguire, Nurse Betty and Leatherheads — just to name a few. She’s also voiced characters in animated films like Bee Movie, Monsters vs. Aliens and Shark Tale. Renee Zellweger is now worth a whopping $60 million!

    Like

  29. Why did everyone turn on Renee Zellweger?

    https://www.datalounge.com/thread/17577925-why-did-everyone-turn-on-renee-zellweger-

    I mean there is always such venom toward her. I thought she did a very good job with Bridget Jones. She even won over the British who were mad that an American was cast.

    Plus she learned to sing and dance for Chicago. The girl was a hard worker. Why the hate?

    Like

  30. Bridget Jones’s Baby bombs as Renee Zellweger’s big-screen return is beaten by Tom Hanks’ Sully at the U.S. box office

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3795385/Box-Office-Blair-Witch-Bridget-Joness-Baby-Fall-Flat-Sully-Soars.html

    Like

    • Why Americans Are So Bloody Awful at British Accents

      http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2016/09/why_are_americans_so_bad_at_british_accents_a_dialect_coach_explains.html

      And in the midst of some recent half-assed work on the elliptical, I noticed that something seems very off about Renée Zellweger in this film. Just … not quite right, you know? Like, vaguely resembling its actual self, but still mutilated almost beyond recognition.

      No, not her face, you patriarchal jerk—I’m talking about her fake British accent, which somehow, over the course of 15 years and three films, appears to have gone from ace to pants.

      When the original Bridget Jones adaptation premiered in 2001, it caused granny-underwear-size shockwaves not just for its star’s monstrous weight gain (to the unheard-of size of many healthy human females), but also for the alleged authenticity of her dialect, which native Britons described as “bang on” and “impeccable.” In the intervening decade and a half, however, it appears that Zellweger has either switched dialect coaches or sacked hers altogether, and I fear Bridget Jones’s Baby will land the actress somewhere between a Costner and a Reeves in the annals of accent history—a bollocks designation to be sure, but one that places her squarely in the majority of her North American peers, when it comes to the seeming impossibility of faking vocal stylings from across the pond.

      Like

  31. Renee Zellweger Roped into Boyfriend’s War with Ex

    https://t.co/qVPq4ds8kv

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: