What the Hell Happened to Uma Thurman?

Uma Thurman

Uma Thurman

Uma Thurman has been a Batman villain, Robin Hood’s girlfriend, an Avenger (the English kind) and Quentin Tarantino’s muse.  She’s worked with Robert DeNiro, Bill Murray, John Travolta and George Clooney.  But these days, she’s shifted gears into supporting roles.  What the hell happened?

Thurman starred her career as a model at the age of 15.

thurman - modeling

Uma Thurman – Modeling career

In 1985, Thurman appeared in Glamour, a Vogue supplement and the cover of British Vogue.  Her modeling work lead to acting opportunities.  In 1988, Thurman appeared in four movies.

thurman - kiss daddy goodnight

Uma Thurman – Kiss Daddy Goodnight – 1987

Thurman’s first acting role was in the no-budget thriller, Kiss Daddy Goodnight.  Thurman played a model who picks up older men so she can drug them and rob them.  Steve Buscemi also appears in a small role.

thurman - johnny be good

Uma Thurman – Johnny Be Good – 1988

Thurman’s first mainstream movie was Johnny Be Good which co-starred Anthony Michael Hall and Robert Downey, Jr.

Hall was desperately trying to escape his image as the brat pack nerd.  He played a star high school quarterback and Downey played his best bud.  A couple of years earlier, Downey had tormented Hall in Weird Science.  It’s funny to remember when Iron Man played second banana to Rusty Griswold.

Johnny Be Good got bad reviews and currently holds a 0% approval rating at Rotten Tomatoes.  It flopped at the box office dooming Hall to the fate suffered by most of the Brat Pack.  Thurman and Downey were more fortunate.

thurman - baron 1

Uma Thurman – The Adventures of Baron Munchausen – 1988

Later that year, Thurman had a small but eye-catching role in Terry Gilliam’s mad fantasy, The Adventures of Baron Munchausen.

The Adventures of Baron Munchausen was a famously troubled movie.  Like most Gilliam movies, the flights of fancy put the film over budget.  A regime change at the studio meant that its US distributors weren’t especially excited about promoting Munchausen.  So they dumped it in relatively few theaters with little fanfare.

thurman - baron 2

Uma Thurman – The Adventures of Baron Munchausen – 1988

Thurman played the goddess Venus who emerged naked from a clam shell.  In her limited screen time, Thurman created one of the more memorably images in a film full of visual splendor.

Although Baron Munchausen flopped in the US, it fared better overseas.  Reviews were mostly positive and the film has developed a cult following.

Next: Dangerous Liaisons and Henry and June


Posted on March 29, 2013, in Movies, What the Hell Happened?, WTHH Actress and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 171 Comments.

  1. ‘Be Cool’: Get Shorty gets shitty.


  2. Enjoyed this latest entry in a great series.

    “Playing for Keeps” isn’t great… but also not quite as bad as its savage treatment by the critics would suggest.. there were some good performances given the limited possibilities of the script. Uma Thurman along with costars Dennis Quaid and Catherine Zeta-Jones helped breathe some life into the project, (Gerard Butler was surprisingly watchable for most of his scenes) however this movie isn’t going to do any of their careers any good.


    • The problem with Playing for Keeps is that it might as well be called Generic Romantic Comedy #12. Even the name screams “meh”. Plus, Butler has long since worn out his welcome playing anything but a Spartan. I’m sure it’s not as bad as critics made it out to be. There are some great actors in the supporting cast. But that’s not enough to save the movie.


  3. Thurman is an appealing presence and seems to have a good sense of humor and pretty good instincts.
    Early on her sexuality was highlighted and it would’ve been easy to tag her as the kind of actress who wouldn’t last more than 5 years in the spotlight. But Tarantino sure did help her out twice! Not that she didn’t deserve it. She was excellent in both Pulp Fiction and the Kill Bill films.
    Unfortunately, although she is still a very attractive woman, age has caught up with her and the transition has not been smooth. She was miscast in the musical version of The Producers in what is supposed to be the ultimate “Va-Va-Voom!” part. Just 10 years prior she might have made it work (her performance was not bad, she gave it the old college try), but the role calls for the milky soft flesh of a younger woman, not the athletic build Thurman had acquired by that time. Your photo from the film makes me look like a liar. Watch the movie.
    I recognize that Hawke can come across as douchey on film sometimes, but I still like him most of the time.


    • Thurman spoke quite a bit about her turn from overtly sexual roles. That seems to have been a key choice in prolonging her career. Although were it not for Tarantino, her career would have flamed out in the 90s. Working with Tarantino is by far the best choice she ever made.

      The worst? Batman and Robin? The Avengers? Or marrying Hawke? Both on screen and off, he seems like a jackass. Never more so than in Tape. That movie was more than I could bear.

      I sort of agree on The Producers. I didn’t feel like she was terribly miscast. But I am sure there are others who could have brought more “Va-Va-Voom” even if it came with les starpower. I think Thurman was cast because the studio wanted some movie stars in their movie.


      • Somebody on Uma’s IMDb message board wrote this about her career:

        Unlike most major Hollywood actresses, Uma has avoided coasting on a “formula”. There is no “Uma Thurman movie” like there is a “Julia Roberts Movie”. Uma does not follow conventional Hollywood trends, she has always chosen the road less traveled. I think, for the most part, her film roles have been very interesting and she obviously does not take most roles just to make a buck. If you look at her resume, she has done a lot of smaller, independent films where she played very interesting characters. She could have easily done what Jennifer Aniston or Julia Roberts or Sandra Bullock have done and just make the same kind of film over and over again.

        And to answer the question as to why she made “My Super Ex-Girlfriend”, they paid her $14 million dollars. Who the hell would turn that down? Every actor has taken a “paycheck” role in their career, some numerous times. Robert DeNiro starred in and produced “The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle”. Need I say more?

        Love her or hate her…nobody can deny that Uma is a very unique actress. She is unlike all the rest and whether or not people like her or her movies is not the point…she has had an over 24 year career in movies and has remained an A-list actress. If that were so easy to do, then everyone would last that long. I think its really interesting that people say how awful she is when we have people like Kirsten Stewart making AWFUL films and passing for an “actress”.

        For those people that think Uma is awful, there are 5 films you should watch and then reevaluate your opinion. They are:

        1. Hysterical Blindness
        2. The Golden Bowl
        3. The Producers
        4. Henry and June
        5. Mad Dog and Glory

        All of these films are fine examples of her versatility and talent. They are films she is less known for, which is why so many people have not seen them. And make no mistake…her performance in both Kill Bill films was outstanding. The scene in Kill Bill, Vol. One when she awakens from her coma to discover she has lost her child…I defy anyone to watch that scene and say she is a terrible actress.

        Bottom line…she is a very interesting, relevant and accomplished actress and no amount of people on a message board with nothing better to do with their time than trash an actress they claim to hate is going to change that.


        • Re: Is she an A-lister celebrity?

          Kinda sorta like B list-ish vs. just 10-15+ years ago when she positively still solid A list. She’s still super famous but her movie career really hasn’t inclined. Just a combo of bad/poor choices. She’s def WAY more sexy, hotter and interesting than Cameron Diaz and Jen Aniston but the media is obsessed w/ them and their personal lives which is the only reason why they still get endless opportunities. Basically from 1994-2005-2010 ish she was instantly an A+ name. When you have to think about it…means no. She’s from the same era when Juliette Lewis (first one who comes to mind) were on fire and everywhere but by the mid 2000s..little by little the movie roles, choices, hype etc…faded. Uma most def. is still a bigger name and if Tarantino or whoever put her in a hit film she’d be up there again in a second.


      • The CineFiles – TV On Film!

        The hosts argued that Uma was miscast in the 1998 “Avengers” movie and that Elizabeth Hurley would’ve been a better choice for Emma Peel.


  4. 10 Formally Respected Actors Who Have Probably Gone Insane:

    2. Uma Thurman

    Is Uma Thurman really this reliant on Quentin Tarantino to make a good film? Having become a member of the Hollywood elite with Pulp Fiction, she became further synonymous with the director after appearing as the main character The Bride in the Kill Bill movies.

    However, since the release of Kill Bill Volume 2, Uma has not done anything remotely as substantial; instead she has chosen to lower herself to appearing in bad romantic comedies like My Super Ex-Girlfriend and The Accidental Husband.

    In 2010, she topped this by starring in Motherhood, which officially became the biggest box office bomb in the history of British cinema, and it didn’t do much better in the rest of the world either.

    Questions about Uma Thurman’s judgement have always been there; this is the woman that was in Batman & Robin and The Avengers after all, but without Tarantino riding in to the rescue, I’m afraid to say her appeal has plunged to perhaps an irrevocable level. It will certainly take nothing short of a miracle to repair her reputation.


  5. Thanks for the catch. I’m interested in tracking down Kiss Daddy Goodnight myself.


  6. Any sympathy I have for Thurman is related to her personal life and not her career. She’s done well. If she had made a better Batman movie or if The Avengers hadn’t stunk, she could have been bigger.

    Conversely, without Tarantino she would have had a career like Bridget Fonda. A promising start that never lives up to its promise. But with her three Tarantino films, she managed to have a long career.

    Even now, I think she’s got a lot of life in her. It just won’t be as an A-list leading lady.


    • Tracking the Career of Uma Thurman:

      As Uma Thurman’s latest movie, Motherhood, gets a very limited theatrical release this weekend, we’re left wondering how this once A-list star’s career went in the tank well before she turned 40. Quentin Tarantino and Kill Bill: Vol. 3 (set for a 2019 release) might be her only hope. We’re pulling for you, Uma!


    • Uma Thurman’s Career Needs a ‘Bill’ Boost:

      Maybe Uma Thurman should finally take David Letterman up on his 1995 offer to meet Oprah Winfrey — at this point, considering her latest film’s box-office numbers, it couldn’t hurt. ‘Motherhood’ opened this past weekend in the UK and made around $130 at the box office. Now, to be clear about a couple of things: That wasn’t a typo where we forgot to add the word “million” at the end of $130. And, we know what you’re also thinking: That we didn’t convert the exchange rate from pounds to dollars. We did. Thurman’s film, measured in pounds, actually made £88. The saddest part is that on it’s debut day, ‘Motherhood’ made £9. The average price to see a movie in the UK appears to be £7 to £10, which means, yes, one lone person went to see it on day one. This begs a few questions: First, who is the mysterious, lone, brave, British moviegoer? Second, are movie ticket prices really that expensive in the UK? Nine pounds ($13.71)? Egads! And why, if Miss Thurman can be so butt-kickingly awesome in Quentin Tarantino movies, has her career been a myriad of near-bombs? After the jump, some theories.

      ‘Motherhood,’ which co-stars Anthony Edwards, focuses on the day-to-day hassles of being a mother living in New York … you know what? It doesn’t really matter.

      Thurman can take little solace in knowing that ‘Motherhood’ did slightly better in the U.S., taking in $93,388 at the domestic box office. Which means, at an average ticket price of $10, a little over 9,300 people saw her film. To put that in perspective, ‘Motherhood’ was seen by about three-tenths of one percent of the people who saw ‘Avatar’ … on its opening day.

      It’s a sad but true moment: Thurman now stars in films that are attended by less people than were actually involved in making them.

      Though ‘Motherhood’ is an exaggerated example, Thurman’s recent record at the box office has been suspect, to say the least. Not counting her well-received role as Medusa in ‘Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief,’ where she was far from the star of the film, she really hasn’t had much of a hit since the two ‘Kill Bill’ films. ‘Prime’ grossed $22.8 million domestically, and ‘The Producers’ grossed $19.3 million.

      Then there’s ‘My Super Ex-Girlfriend’ — a film that pretty much destroyed the film careers of everyone associated with it (and which, based on the premise alone, should have been much, much better). Rainn Wilson has yet to — quite surprisingly — latch onto much of a film career. Director Ivan Reitman, who directed ‘Ghostbusters’ and ‘Stripes,’ has yet to direct a film since. And Luke Wilson is, well … Luke Wilson can currently be seen throwing postcards across a map of the United States while he explains the reach of AT&T’s cellular service.

      It can’t be all Thurman’s fault, and no one doubts her ability as an actress. A lot of factors can combine to produce deadly outcomes at the box office. We asked Stu VanAirsdale of his opinion on Thuman’s recent career.

      “It’s really easy for all of us to get hung up on a star’s bad opening or a hard-luck streak, but let’s be realistic,” VanAirsdale says, “‘Motherhood’ was a small film that wasn’t supposed to burn up the box office. And people wouldn’t even show up to a Miley Cyrus movie if the studio didn’t promote it. It’s biggest value was always on DVD, where it’ll do just fine.”

      VanAirsdale argues that Thurman’s not the only star that should think twice about their recent roles.

      “Sure, Thurman’s choices could be better, but so could Matt Damon’s. He’s had the biggest studio flop to date in 2010 [‘Green Zone’], and he didn’t exactly burn up the charts with ‘The Informant’ last fall. No one’s calling him out, though. Throw him in a ‘Bourne’ film again, though, and he’ll be fine. Same with Thurman: Let’s revisit this after ‘Kill Bill 3.’ She’ll be fine.”

      And VanAirsdale warns: Don’t be too quick to judge, considering one of her latest roles. “Did you see her as Medusa in ‘Percy Jackson and the Olympians: The Lighting Thief?’ She was the best, campiest, craziest thing about it. Cut her some slack.”

      Though, if Thurman’s box office continues to sink, she might want to take a page from her former co-star, Luke Wilson. Catherine Zeta Jones’ reign as T-Mobile spokeswoman can’t last forever.


    • 11 Crappiest Movies of Uma Thurman’s Career:

      For many reasons, I prefer to think of Uma Thurman exclusive in a Quentin Tarantino context. Let’s face it — she’s never performed better for any other director, and otherwise, she has terrible taste in screenplays. Uma has appeared in so many crappy movies, and here are the top eleven of them:


    • Her height probably was a factor. But, I think she was also typecast in sexy siren roles and decided after Dangerous Liaisons to stop taking those roles. I think directors were after her for a certain type of role, but she was trying to reinvent her image.

      In fairness to the TV Robin Hood, it was meant to be a feature. But Kevin Costner steam rolled it.


    • The comments regarding Uma’s height being problematic makes me wonder if Geena Davis’ (another beautiful but really tall female WTHHT subject) career ultimately suffered because too?


    • 10 Movie Franchises That Were Doomed To Fail:

      The Avengers

      What’s it about?

      Adapted from the British television series from the 1960s, The Avengers follows the adventures of John Steed and Emma Peel (Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman) as they go head to head against Sean Connery’s Sir August de Wynter. In between bouts of poorly choreographed action they sip tea, doff hats and generally engage in dreadfully stereotypical “British” behavior which only a non-Brit would find remotely amusing.

      Why was it doomed to fail?

      Kingsman: The Secret Service recently proved that a posh bloke in a bowler hat can appeal to a wide audience in an action movie, but there are few other parallels to be drawn between Kingsman and The Avengers. After refusing to allow critics to see the film then unceremoniously dumping it in theaters after the summer holidays were over, it was clear to everyone that Warner Bros were well aware they had a stinker on their hands.

      An atrocious script combined with a complete lack of chemistry between Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman and terrible special effects led some critics to label The Avengers “the worst movie ever made”. Any film which can be said to give Howard The Duck a good name – as one critic suggested – is clearly destined to flop.


  7. That’s where limited releases give me fits. PF premiered at Cannes in May of 94. It received a wide release in October. Cowgirls opened in Totonto in Sep of 93. It opened in the US in May of 94.

    I will flip flop them. Thanks again for the catch.


  8. What Happened to Uma Thurman’s Career?:

    In Gerard Butler’s latest critically reviled vehicle “Playing for Keeps,” Oscar-nominee Uma Thurman plays second fiddle to Jessica Biel, an actress better known for her love life than her acting career. As Patti, a bored trophy housewife married to a philandering husband (Dennis Quaid), Thurman, as always, gives the underwritten supporting role her all, vamping it up when Robbie Fox’s misogynistic script calls for it and stealing scenes from Biel (Butler’s romantic interest in the film) when she’s included in the same frame (which is sadly not all that often).

    Still, despite her committed work, chances are you won’t leave the romantic comedy singing praises of her performance. Rather, you’ll be asking yourself: what happened to Thurman’s career?

    It’s a valid question, one we’ve been debating for some time. Since hitting a career high as The Bride, Quentin Tarantino’s vengeful sword wielding assassin the the “Kill Bill” films, Thurman’s seen her Hollywood stature as one of the most coveted and talented women in the business take a nosedive.

    It all started with her immediate follow-up to “Kill Bill: Vol. 2,” “Be Cool,” the ill-advised sequel to “Get Shorty,” that saw her reunite with her “Pulp Fiction” co-star John Travolta. The film was a critical and box-office misfire that drew none of the praise bestowed upon its witty predecessor. Her follow-up to that was the affecting romantic comedy “Prime,” but thanks to Meryl Streep in full blown comedy mode as an overbearing Jewish mother, Thurman didn’t register as the lead of the film — which she was. Her two that followed — “The Producers” and “My Super Ex-Girlfriend” — were dead upon arrival, but no doubt the worst offender was her 2009 starring vehicle “Motherhood.” Dumped into UK cinemas with little to no fanfare, the comedy made headlines in Britain for only selling a measly eleven tickets on its opening weekend. Talk about a bust.

    Since seeing that badly received film tank, Thurman’s never fully recovered — appearing in the little-seen indie “Ceremony,” alongside Robert Pattinson in the pedestrian period romp “Bel Ami,” and as Medusa in the forgettable teen action pic “Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightening Thief.” In fact, her most profile work since “Prime” was a five-episode arc on the Broadway TV drama “Smash,” in which she played a Hollywood star vying for to embody Marilyn Monroe on the Great White Way. Not a bad gig, but unfortunately for her fan base, a short lived one.

    And let’s not forget the “Savages” fiasco. In Oliver Stone’s latest that opened to decent notices this past summer, Thurman was set to appear alongside a cast that included Salma Hayek and Benecio del Toro, as mother to Blake Lively’s character. Unfortunately for the actress, Stone, in his ruthless editing of the movie, left all of her scenes on the cutting room floor.

    The reason this is all especially dispiriting: Thurman proved she could do pretty much anything Tarantino threw her way in the “Kill Bill” films. Master fight choreography? Check. Cry on cue? Check. Wrestle with Tarantino’s verbose banter and own every word as if they’re your own? Check. Granted, a role like The Bride is a once-in-a-lifetime gig for actors as fortunate as her, but the fact still remains: no writer-director has quite known what to do with her since.

    All of this points to the obvious conundrum: Hollywood doesn’t know what to do with actresses when they hit 40, unless you’re Meryl Streep. As the last decade has proven, TV is the place for female stars of certain age to jump-start their careers once their Hollywood offers dry up. Everyone from Glenn Close, to Thurman’s “Kill Bill” co-star Lucy Liu have done it with varying degrees of success. Whether Thurman’s big screen prowess can translate to the small screen for the full run of a show (unlike her brief stint on “Smash”) remains to be seen.

    Our take? Any TV studio would be lucky to have her. Make it happen! Either that or Tarantino better make good on his promise to make another “Kill Bill” film, thereby reminding audiences of how awesome Thurman truly is.


    • Who were the up-and-coming actors that never became huge stars?

      Add Uma Thurman to the list of actresses who fell short. And she did it to herself. She chose to step back from acting when she became a mother and would only work in New York. The one big exception she made was the Kill Bill flicks. Those movies are apparently going to be the defining role of her career.

      But let’s face it, she had another liability: she’s a giant. She’s 6 feet tall out of heels in a city full of midgets. I saw ‘Mad Dog and Glory’ not long ago. God was she gorgeous, but she spent the whole movie sitting because if she stood she’d tower over De Niro. You know Uma will never be in a Tom Cruise movie.


  9. Hollywood Hype Machine:

    Examples on the fence:

    Uma Thurman was victimized by this. After notable roles in the late ’80s with films like Dangerous Liaisons and The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, she became an “It Girl” with Pulp Fiction. This push ultimately faltered within three years after subsequent films, particularly Batman & Robin and The Avengers (1998), did poorly, and she vanished from the limelight (rumour has it she took time off to concentrate on motherhood, which might have killed buzz even further) before Kill Bill reignited her career in 2003.


  10. I love these blogs! Could you possibly do ones on Moira Kelly, Rob Schneider, and Denis Leary?


  11. By the way, I don’t know if you do this, but if you do Moira Kelly, the reason she hasn’t been in a mainstream released movie since about 1995 was because she apparently quit Hollywood because she didn’t like their ideals especially considering she was a christian.


  12. Also, what do you think of my other 2 choices?


    • They are both good suggestions. They are not currently on my list, but eventually I will probably get around to them both.


      • Thanks! Actually, now that I think about it, I think all of Adam Sandler’s co-stars and the other 2 guys who star in the Ice Age movies would be good suggestions!


  13. Actually I sort of take that back-you can sum up a WTTH article for Ray Romano in a paragraph: He was a stand-up comedian no one heard of until he made a sitcom that was a big hit. He starred in an animated movie that was also successful and spawned off sequels. But his attempt at becoming a movie star fell through when Welcome to Mooseport flopped. Now he’s been relegated to Ice Age sequels and TV appearances.

    Not that interesting, now that I think about it…Even Moira Kelly got more chances to be a star than him!


    • Romano isn’t an A list movie actor, if he did any movies at all, none come to mind. TV wise he might be considered A? Not sure though. I never really got the whole grading system but it seems to be that for A list movie actors/actresses, it’s about awards and the ability to open a movie on their name alone. So I’m guessing the people you listed are all fine comics but mostly TV and don’t have A list movie careers to be profiled. Rob Schneider, though.. wasn’t he in something?


      • He was in Welcome to Mooseport-it’s fine if you haven’t heard of it, it really came and went!


      • Schneider has starred in an alarming number of movies. He’s kind of the Pauly Shore of his day except he is backed by his powerful buddy Adam Sandler who keeps getting him (and all his other pals) work through Happy Madison Productions.

        Before that, Schneider was frequently comic relief in action movies. He did 2 with Sylvester Stallone; Demolition Man and Judge Dredd.


  14. Also he’s in those Ice Age things.


    • Yeah, Romano followed pretty closely in the Jerry Seinfeld career mode. Successful stand-up gets a hit TV show. Flirts with a movie career that doesn’t really take off. Does some voice work. Came back in a less successful TV show. Romano has actually been more successful than Seinfeld in that regard. But they are both more TV stars/stand-ups than movie stars.


      • Yeah, that’s why I took back the Ray Romano suggestion. John Leguizamo, though, might not be such a bad idea…


        • I could definitely see doing an article on Leguizamo somewhere down the line. He always seemed to be on the cusp of being a breakout star.



        Ray Romano and Gene Hackman’s careers never really survived Welcome to Mooseport. After its release, Romano never headlined another live action movie again and has been doing mostly Ice Age sequels, TV appearances, indies, and one direct-to-video movie while Hackman retired after making the film.


      • 9 TV Stars Who Horribly Botched Their Big Leap Into Films:

        1. Ray Romano

        Ray Romano was on top of the world during his nine-season run on his sitcom Everybody Loves Raymond. Not only was Romano the star of the show, but he also produced the show and wrote many episodes. During the series Romano also voiced Manny the woolly mammoth in Ice Age, a role he has reprised in three more movies and a television special.

        However, live action film success has been elusive for Romano. The first film he starred in, 2004′s Welcome to Mooseport, didn’t even make half of its budget back at the box office and earned a 13% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. It even soured co-star Gene Hackman so much with acting that he retired four years later without making another movie. Romano’s following movies Grilled (which co-starred fellow sitcom star Kevin James) and The Last Word were released direct-to-video in the U.S. Romano obviously got the hint and has stuck with television ever since with only a handful of small movie roles in between.


  15. Thanks! Another suggestion is Maria Pitillo. Despite the fact that her IMDB page is dead, she was apparently a rising star at one point.



      Maria Pitillo in Godzilla. After years appearing in small roles in such numerous films and television shows, Pitillo was cast as the female lead in the big-budget adaptation of Godzilla. But once it underperformed, she didn’t do much work after this (and the disastrous Something To Believe In didn’t help), with her highest-profile work subsequently being a regular role on Providence, and nothing since 2008.

      At that time, 1998, she was being touted as the next big thing. I remember she had a TV show and the promo materials were claiming she was the next Lucy. She was on the cover of magazines when Godzilla came out. Both the show and the movie flopped and she was nowhere near Lucy. It’s not her fault that she was promoted that way but the flops definitely hurt her reputation.

      Yeah she’s pretty much just fallen off the face of the Earth now.

      Other than that guest cameo in that TV show a few years back there’s been nothing.

      My guess is that she either a) quit acting altogether, b) was dropped by her agency and no other agency will represent her, or c) a combination of both.

      It’s a shame really because I truly think she was a victim of something she really had no control over. The “Godzilla” movie had a backlash altogether but she seemed to take the brunt of it while everyone else got off scott free.

      Hopefully she comes back to acting.

      Wasn’t she huge on NBC for about a year and then ->poof<-…. her 10 minutes of fame were over? Thank GOD! She was the worst, and most shallow actress to ever be cast in anything. I actually felt my soul being sucked from my being whenever she was in the shot.

      All looks and no ability.


    • Hilary Swank is somebody (since another past Best Actress Oscar winner in Reese Witherspoon, is now on the WTHHT poll) who I would suggest for a future “What the Hell Happened to…” article:


      • Star Derailing Role:

        The Reaping put Hilary Swank’s career to a screeching halt. After scoring another critical flop with PSI Love You the same year, she tried to gain back some Oscar Bait with the biopic Amelia and the drama Conviction within two years. The former was a critical and commercial failure and the while the latter got good reviews and Swank was nominated for a Screen Actors Guild Award for her performance, it didn’t do that much money at the box office. Another movie she made, the 2011 thriller film The Resident went straight to DVD instead. Following a part in the poorly-received ensemble romantic comedy film New Years Eve, not much of her upcoming projects have been announced since.


      • Post-Oscar Underachievers:15 Academy Award Winners Whose Follow-Ups Did Not Hold Up:

        Two time Academy Award winner Hilary Swank shouldn’t be on this list. But since being honored for Million Dollar Baby, the actress has been racking up a series of cinematic clunkers. Quite frankly, titles like The Reaping, The Resident, and The Black Dahlia failed to utilize the actresses talents like her Oscar darlings. She too will be descending into the ranks of made-for-television movies this year with Mary & Marcy, a drama produced by HBO and the BBC.


      • That’s a good suggestion. I had forgotten her to the degree she wasn’t even on my radar.


        • That’s it. Swank is next!


        • Swank will be a very interesting read, one I look forward to. Be sure not to forget The Next Karate Kid in her write-up! You would never guess that she would grow as an actress from the poor man’s Ralph Macchio to a multi-Academy Award winning actress.


        • The opposrtunity to write up KK4 is at least 40% of my motivation for writing the article. And let’s not forget she was canned from Beverly Hills 90210. She came from very humble beginnings.


        • Craig Hansen

          Wow, I completely forgot she was fired from BH90210. That’s definately going to be a juicy part of the article right there. More of a side-note really, but i find it interesting that KK4 has Pat Morita returning to his Oscar nominated role as Miyagi (he was nominated for Best Supporting Actor for the first film), and of course Swank would go on to multiple Oscar wins later in her career. Bit player Walton Goggins would even go on to win an Oscar for Best Short Film also. More of a hint of Oscar prestigue (past and future) than one would expect in this type of B-level movie.


    • Whatever Happened to…?: Vol. 4 – Maria Pitillo:

      The TriStar Pictures produced American remake of Godzilla was a hotly anticipated film back in 1998. Sony’s marketing team worked overtime, making sure the film was absolutely everywhere (I still remember the Taco Bell tie-ins and the awful soundtrack). The special effects looked, at the time, stunning. Godzilla’s creature design itself was a huge secret going in, with even the toys being blacklisted from release until a certain date so as not to spoil the “surprise.” Director Roland Emmerich had scored mega-success two years prior with Independence Day, one of the highest grossing films of the 90s (and the biggest science fiction film at the time since Terminator 2). Star Matthew Broderick had been a successful screen presence since the early 80s. Co-star Jean Reno was internationally renowned for his work in films like The Professional, an influential action film from successful producer and filmmaker Luc Besson. The weak-link, if there was indeed a weak-link in the pre-release hype for the film, was in its female lead and co-star, the little-known (and still little-known today) Maria Pitillo.

      Maria Pitillo never expected to get into acting. Raised in an Italian-American family in New Jersey, Pitillo only took up acting during a chance encounter with a summer theater troupe. After this experience, she began finding work in commercials in New York City in the late 1980s. She then gained some experience in smaller projects such as various CBS After School Specials (which I kind of wish were still around because they’re hilarious), but never took acting seriously until after appearing in 1992’s critically acclaimed Chaplin. After Chaplin, she gained higher profile roles in True Romance, Natural Born Killers, Bye Bye Love (which aired continuously on pay cable in the mid-90s), and the failed Greg Kinnear vehicle Dear God (the commercials for which still haunt me occasionally some odd 17 years after its release). Pitillo, who had never starred as a billed main character in a mainstream movie, was an unlikely choice then for Godzilla.

      When the film released to absolutely dreadful reviews, a certain amount of scorn and hatred was reserved for Pitillo’s character, would-be plucky news reporter Audrey Timmonds. A character so dumb you’d think she’d be on The Walking Dead, Audrey Timmonds is the ditziest of the ditzy blondes. She provided absolutely nothing to the movie, and despite Pitillo’s up-for-anything style of acting, the script was just too bad to salvage the character. Broderick and Reno got off comparatively light, and both have gone on to continue the successful careers they already had. Emmerich bounced back not long after with projects like The Day After Tomorrow and 2012 (though his recent White House Down was one of summer’s biggest flops). Godzilla was not well received whatsoever (to put it nicely), and the film quickly leveled off at the box office without so much as sniffing any of the all-time records it seemingly had its sights set on just weeks before release.

      I legitimately hate the Razzie Awards. I find them mean-spirited, unfunny, and unfair in many cases. I don’t think that Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt were bad in Interview with the Vampire. I don’t think it was fair to nominate Katie Holmes for her work in Batman Begins. I don’t find it particularly fair either that Nic Cage and Sylvester Stallone receive nominations every year just because it’s popular to harp on them (if anything Stallone and Cage are doing great work in not-so-great productions). I do, however, totally agree that Pitillo deserved the nomination and win she got for her role in Godzilla. She is abysmal in it, and I find it to be one of the worst supporting performances in any film I’ve ever seen. Godzilla is not a good film whatsoever, and Broderick looks like he is sleepwalking throughout the entire thing. But Pitillo is a different kind of awful. You can tell she’s actually trying, and there’s just nothing there whatsoever. I know the script is bad. I know that the shooting schedule was short and hectic. I know that director Roland Emmerich has expressed disappointment in his own work on the film. But Pitillo remains the absolute worst part of Godzilla, and that is very special in its own terrible way.

      It is quite difficult to talk about Maria Pitillo’s career without also talking about Godzilla. The two are now and will forever be tied together. The horrendous failure of the film, a film which has zero defenders because of how truly awful it is, had the largest effect on Pitillo’s career out of any other major player in the production. Look no further than her post-Godzilla filmography and this bears out as true (as well as sad). Before Godzilla, Pitillo appeared in 17 movies. After its failure, she appeared in just three, one of which was a made-for-TV special. Her filmography since appearing in Godzilla is both sparse and sad. She appeared in three unsold pilots for various networks (one of which featured a pre-Two and a Half Men Jon Cryer), and her most recent credit is from a 2008 television show called Big Shots that lasted all of 11 episodes before cancellation.

      So whatever happened to Maria Pitillo? Despite Godzilla essentially ruining her movie career, Pitillo seems like she’s doing just fine for herself I guess. She’s been married since 2002 and has a daughter. She’s described as a Yoga and running enthusiast, so she’s got that going for her too. Not everyone can have the level of sustained Hollywood success that someone like Sandra Bullock or Meryl Streep enjoys. Every once in a while (and probably more than every once in a while) there’s a Maria Pitillo out there, someone who never expected to become famous, and then flat-lined when her star-making role was terrible. Who knows, maybe 5 or 10 years from now we’ll ask ourselves what Blake Lively or Gemma Arterton are up to. I think we could certainly ask what Eva Green’s been up to for the last couple of years. During the whirlwind Godzilla production, Maria Pitillo probably felt fame and fortune within her grasp, but the two are fleeting and she just never quite made it. Had Godzilla been a good movie, then who knows how things would have shaken out for her. It wasn’t, however, and her career died on the table.


  16. I’m sure that’s a factor. I don’t think it’s the ONLY factor though.


  17. Kill Bill received mostly good reviews and was a hit at the box office. Thurman was nominated for both an Oscar and a Golden Globe.

    Lebeau, Thurman wasn’t nominated for the Oscar. She was nominated for the BAFTA and Golden Globes. This year, the Oscar nominees were: Keisha Castle-Hughes, Diane Keaton, Samantha Morton, Charlize Theron (the winner) and Naomi Watts.


    • Ack! Thanks for the catch. Not sure where that came from.


    • I can get behind that. Kill Bill 1 and 2 were great. But I think there was a bit of a Tarantino backlash at the time. He’d been away for a while. And Kill Bill 1 was mostly style over substance until you see Kill Bill 2. It definitely helped Thurman get back in the spotlight. But it probably could have been even more successful if it had been a single movie.


      • Wow. That’s pretty ridiculous. Why give her a Razzie? Must have been a slow year.

        Apparently she wasn’t just nominated for the Razzie. She “won”! That’s crazy.


        ◦Colleen Camp, THE SEDUCTION
        ◦Dyan Cannon, DEATHTRAP
        ◦Lois Nettleton, BUTTERFLY
        ◦Aileen Quinn, ANNIE


        • Like any awards, the Razzies get a lot of things wrong. Apparently in 82 they had a grudge against Annie which was nominated in several categories. I don’t love the movie, but come on!

          (After watching Arrested Development all weekend, I might end every comment with come on!)


  18. Joel Schumacher’s Batman: 6 Things He Did Better Than Nolan:

    2. Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy

    It’s all pure camp. There’s no denying that. But it’s the good kind of camp. It’s the What Ever Happened To Baby Jane/ Mommie Dearest kind of camp.

    I think the difference between good camp and bad camp is whether or not the actor is able to pull off the performance. Arnold Schwarzenegger as Mr. Freeze falls into the category of bad camp because he played the part so over the top that he lost his motivation and let the character get away from him. But Uma Thurman doesn’t make the same mistake: not once in the film, whether she was slinking around in her sexy Poison Ivy cat suit or giving one of her sultry super villain monologues, did she ever lose grasp of the roots of who her character was. If an actor is able to do this then the audience wont be distracted by how far out into left field the actor takes the character but rather will go along for the ride. They will be shocked (or appalled) just by how twisted a human being the person has become but they will never lose their investment in the character (think of what Tim Curry in the Rocky Horror Picture Show).

    Poison Ivy has always been one of the more fanciful villains in Batman’s Rogues Gallery. She is a woman with an affinity for plant life that goes far beyond that of the average tree hugger – we’re talking about a psychosis that verges on full blown Dendrophilia with homicidal tendencies. A woman driven to new heights of lunacy by her fanatical devotion to mother nature. Rendering such an obtuse character at least halfway believable (in the cinematic sense) would not be an easy task but Thurman pulled it off. How? By finding a base for her performance in a famous example of (overblown) cinematic femininity: Mae West

    Mae West was a woman who was a feminine force of sexual nature. Poison Ivy functions in the same way as Mae except that in Mae’s world men = sex and in Ivy’s world plants = sex. By using a familiar cultural touchstone as a basis for her acting, Uma maintained an element of believably in her performance because she was working in a vein of fictionalized woman hood that we as a culture had come to accept. As a result no matter how crazy her performance got, we bought it.

    I have a lot of fun with Uma Thurman’s performance because I see how much gusto she puts into it. Yes, if I had my druthers I would have probably told Uma to dial it back a little bit; maybe tone down the sultry/seductive tendencies from 11 down to 10. But it is still a dynamite performance and I doubt, in the rare event Poison Ivy ever makes her way back to the big screen, that another actress will be able to do any better.

    Compare her performance to the Nolan villains, and she is head and shoulders above them, because of her conviction and the explicit homages in her performance. And Schumacher deserves the credit for the casting.


    • 5 Reasons Why Batman And Robin Is A Genuine Guilty Pleasure Movie:

      2. Poison Ivy

      The performance of Uma Thurman is one which has divided the die-hard comic book community, however there are several factors which make her portrayal of Red a defining highlight, not just of Batman and Robin, but the entire series.

      Uma had a hard act to follow. Two films earlier, the physical and independent portrayal of Catwoman by Michelle Pfeiffer set the bar for female villains in Gotham. As such, the selection of Poison Ivy, an indulgent, controlling, siren who shamelessly seduces the opposite sex to get her way, was actually a very wise move from the team at Batman and Robin.

      Regardless of your thoughts on the film as a whole, Thurman was seductive, cunning and hateable; creating the most enduring image of the character to date.


      • 8 Fictional Characters That Are Hotter Than The Actress Who Played Them:

        8. Uma Thurman/Poison Ivy – Batman And Robin

        Uma Thurman makes her way through various different points on the hotness scale. Most of the time she looks average, other times she looks rugged but in some films she manages to look downright hot. Batman and Robin is one of those films where she looks hot, despite the fact that the film sucks badly.

        Not much can be said about the quality of Batman and Robin as a film but for all the terrible things that came out of it Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy was one of the few good things. Uma manages to be extremely seductive while trying to make Batman and Robin jealous of each other but really what she does is make us jealous that she’s not trying to seduce us. Her bright red hair and skintight outfit makes her arguably the sexiest character to ever appear in a Batman film.

        Don’t get me wrong, Uma is a good-looking woman and she always has the potential to be hot…but not Poison Ivy hot.


        • Batman on Film Part 6: Batman & Robin (1997):

          Uma Thurman portrays Poison Ivy. Sigh. Really? Poison Ivy is supposed to be a seductive knock-out. And while I love her as “The Bride” in Kill Bill, Uma Thurman always kind of strikes me as a dirty hippie and not a devilish temptress that Ivy is supposed to be. She was horribly miscast, but in the end result of this film… does it really matter? Thurman was obviously cast because after the success of Pulp Fiction, she was kind of an “It” girl.



          All traces of the almost-real world logic of the Burton series are well and truly gone by this point as is the interest in developing compelling origins for the villains with each originating after boringly being doused/injected with a respective chemical. Uma Thurman essentially plays the same role as Catwoman in BATMAN RETURNS, transforming from meek and bullied Dr. Pamela Isley into sensual super villain Poison Ivy, but the transformation is handled so poorly and the acting both before and after the transformation so over the top that it makes Michelle Pfeiffer’s performance in her similar role seem like she’s the female Daniel Day Lewis by comparison. Thurman’s acting is pure pantomime, about as broad as you can get. I mentioned the Power Rangers influence on Batman Forever but this time round the influence is even stronger. In fact this is more like an extended Power Rangers episode than a feature film and Poison Ivy fits right into that level of drama. Every line, action and costume constructed to appeal only to 9 year olds. And 9 year olds with poor taste at that. When she turned up half way through in a gorilla costume and proceeded to do a choreographed dance entrance my eyes rolled so hard I saw the color of my brain.


      • The Many Times The ‘Batman & Robin’ Cast Have Trashed (Or Defended) The Movie

        In 2014, when I interviewed Uma Thurman with childlike glee, she linked the reception of “Batman & Robin” to audiences’ unwillingness to accept superhero stories that don’t revel in hyper-masculine aesthetics. Whether or not Thurman’s analysis holds weight, she waxed poetic about the evolution of queer sensibilities in a way that I’ll never forget. Thurman resisted applying the word “camp” to “Batman & Robin,” and she’s right. True camp has a certain self-awareness that this film distinctly lacks. It’s just a bloated, silly circus designed to produce toys and flashy marketing tie-ins and a best-selling soundtrack featuring Jewel, The Smashing Pumpkins and R. Kelly. That doesn’t mean it’s not also a fun relic of Hollywood’s evolving blockbuster culture.

        Uma Thurman, Poison Ivy

        “It came out in a different time when people were still being bitchy about campy. Humor being campy and campy being a code word for gay has changed. … I think at the time the idea of taking a male superhero and having fun with it and someone using the C-word [campy] on it caused people to be very nasty. And that kind of nastiness was acceptable on those terms. And I think that’s the reason some people were particularly annoyed. They didn’t like seeing that tone applied to their heterosexual male icon.” (2014)



      Not a single element of the film is played straight, but this isn’t the worst part: the worst part is that nobody takes it at all seriously. Because even dizzy camp can and must be taken seriously, as the ’60s show perfectly demonstrates. Schumacher, famously, directs with a pronounced lack of interest in the actual movie, focusing instead on the dopiest elements of the humor he can scrounge up (also the bodies of three heroes, but really just in their introductions: the sight of Bat-A** is weird enough for it to command attention, but it’s not as though the director makes a Bat-Porno. It would probably have been better if he had), and letting Thurman indulge far too much in a showy, horribly melodramatic performance that is, I think, supposed to be her homage to Mae West, but feels like a small child trying to play a thematically inane prostitute. It is a shockingly low moment for a generally talented actress; just one year before her terrible work in The Avengers, it makes you wonder what the hell was going on in her life at the time that was so traumatising, that i led to such unhinged, kitschy acting. Or hell, maybe she saw where the project was going, and decided to have fun with it.


    • Batman and Robin Commentary Podcast:

      Uma’s performance as Poison Ivy and career in general is talked about in from approximately the 1:11:53-1:14:32. Does anybody else agree w/ the argument that when Uma Thurman really cares about a project she can give a really good performance? However when she seemingly doesn’t (as evidence by “Batman & Robin” for example), it isn’t all that fun to watch!?


    • Why doesn’t Uma Thurman get the praise that Michelle Pfeiffer gets for Batman?


      • Batman – Joel Schumacher — Batman Forever (1995) and Batman & Robin (1997):

        Like with all the Batman films before it, the villains of Batman & Robin dominate the film, which is unfortunate because Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Mr. Freeze and Uma Thurman’s Poison Ivy were the worst villains yet. Schwarzenegger’s Freeze is a pun-machine, literally spewing off more ice puns than actual lines. While Freeze is a hilarious joke of a character, Poison Ivy is a painful mess to watch.

        Ivy is probably Thurman’s worst performance to date. Not only does her performance lack even the groan-inducing humor of Schwarzenegger’s Freeze, she is actively regressive. While the eco-terrorist aspect of her character would be seen as somewhat admirable nowadays, in 1997 Schumacher and company played Ivy’s admirable motivations as idiotic and laughable. In one scene Ivy admonishes Bruce Wayne to shut down destructive corporate practices in South America, to which Wayne quips: “People matter more than plants,” before joining his employees in laughing off the absurdity of ethical corporate practice.


    • Batman & Robin – Hilariocity Review w/ The Flick Pick:

      Chris Stuckmann and John Flickinger team up to review one of the dumbest movies ever made, Batman & Robin!


      • 13 Comic Book Villains That Movies Ruined Worse Than Dr. Doom:

        Poison Ivy (Batman & Robin)

        It’s clear that Poison Ivy was supposed to be a sexy seductress in Joel Schumacher’s infamous misfire, but due to the agonizing amount of camp, Uma Thurman’s take on the character ends up being more freaky and annoying than desirable. Who can forget the scene in which Ivy dances around in a gorilla suit before administering her love potion to Batman (George Clooney) and Robin (Chris O’Donnell), leading to the infuriating “Bat credit card” moment.

        Her plan, to cover the world with her mutant plants, is more silly than scary or threatening, and Thurman’s performance is so outrageously over-the-top that it pretty much negates any genuine villainy she shoots for, unsurprisingly causing her to be nominated for a Worst Supporting Actress Razzie award in the process.

        With painfully innuendo-laced dialogue like “Come join me. My garden needs tending” and “How about ‘slippery when wet?’”, is it any surprise that the character, like most in Batman and Robin, was a complete laughing stock?



      Matt 18 hours ago
      Kinda weird that Uma Thurman makes a comparison to #$%$ culture” when this movie and that concept had nothing to do with it, frankly. I think Batman and Robin is an extremely important cultural milestone–it marked the point in history where we finally knew how much silly cartoon nonsense in a comic book movie was “too much”. It’s still incredibly fun to watch in its own right just because of how much it does wrong; it’s endearing in the way that a house fly thunking repeatedly against a light bulb is endearing. Anyway, filmmakers took the lessons learned from Batman and Robin and gradually steered comic book films into a more serious, grounded form–Spider-man, X-men, Batman Begins, Watchmen, Iron Man–all of them were better movies because Batman and Robin existed.

      A 3 hours ago
      Her “sexism” excuse for the movie not being well received is complete nonsense. It had nothing to do with it being “gay” (her words), it was the horrible over acting from the villains in particular and the “toyetic-ness” of everything. Tbh, the only character that wasn’t overdone was Alfred.


  19. 10 Actors Who Need To Make A Great Movie Before It’s Too Late:

    6. Uma Thurman

    Last Great Movie: Kill Bill, Vol. 2 (2004)

    Lovely Uma Thurman started her career making good films like Pulp Fiction and Tape, and bad movies like Batman & Robin and The Avengers, but there was a nice balance going on – she was just like all the other Hollywood stars. Despite the fact that Quentin Tarantino is renowned for bringing forgotten actors out of the [expletive] and into the limelight, he seems to have had the total opposite effect on poor ol’ Uma Thurman.

    Seriously. Since Kill Bill, Thurman hasn’t made a single good movie. I’m not being over dramatic when I say that. You can look through them all and everything – there’s 14 of ‘em by my count, and every one is certified “rotten” on Rotten Tomatoes. I mean, that’s tragic, isn’t it? The odds should have favored her at least one of those times, surely? So nowadays you don’t hear a lot about Uma Thurman, which is a shame, considering that she’s a great actress. Box office poison and the bane of movie critics everywhere, but a great actress nonetheless.


    • 8 Talented Actors Who Just Made Five Awful Movies In A Row:

      8. Uma Thurman

      The Five Awful Movies: Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief, Ceremony, Bel Ami, Savages (role was cut out), Playing For Keeps,

      There was a time when I actually cared what Uma Thurman was doing, and that time was back in 2003, when Kill Bill was coming out, and she was one of the my favorite actresses. Prior to writing this article, though, I realized that I hadn’t really thought about Uma Thurman for a couple of years, and I wondered why. I realized that it was because I haven’t seen her in a good movie for about 10 years. I’m serious. What’s happened, girl?

      What’s happened, I guess, is that Uma is struggling to find a place for herself in Hollywood right now. I mean, she’s probably not young enough to be considered a leading lady anymore, is she? Not my words, but likely Hollywood’s. Either that, or she’s in need of a better agent. Maybe the last five movies that she agreed to star in genuinely looked good on paper or something, and it was an unlucky shame that they turned out so badly. But I’ve let her off the hook by saying “five awful movies in a row” – she’s actually made, like, fourteen in a row.


      • 10 Actors Who Hit Career Derailing Box-Office Free Falls:

        Finally, Uma Thurman has been in free-fall essentially since 2005’s Be Cool, starting with Producers and My Super Ex-Girlfriend, hitting a low point with Motherhood, a movie that had an opening weekend of £88 in the UK. Poor Uma.


        • Bad Luck or Bad Choices: 10 movie stars who can’t buy a hit:

          Uma Thurman

          “Ceremony”: is a movie we did not know existed

          “Bel Ami”: bad luck

          “Playing for Keeps”: third banana to Jessica Biel and Gerard Butler

          “Movie 43”: bad luck

          Our advice: “Kill Bill, Vol. 3.” Make it happen, Uma. Make. It. Happen.


        • Movies which were star vehicles and the star blew their chance at super-stardom:

          12-13-09, 02:36 AM

          12-13-09, 02:36 AM
          Luke Wilson is a walking monument to epic fail. Dude gets so many chances I have to wonder who he has pictures of.

          But while I think Wilson has no redeemable talent, Uma Thurman certainly does and has blown repeated opportunities. Ok, she was 18-19 and freaked out at all the attention her naked boobs got in ‘Dangerous Liasons’ and went into hiding for a year. She was a kid. But post ‘Pulp Fiction,” she was doing ‘Beautiful Girls’ and ‘The Truth About Cats & Dogs.’ ‘Gattaca’ was a flop at the time and found its fame in later years. She laid low after having 2 kids, came back, got a ton of momentum coming out of the ‘Kill Bill’ flicks and then blew it because she refuses to work outside of NYC, where she lives (due to the kids) and ends up doing dreck like ‘My Super Ex-Girlfriend’ and ‘Motherhood.’ She should have gotten an Oscar by now but, well… I guess her film career isn’t the top thing in her life. That much is obvious by her decision to stay in NYC rather than work.


        • Derailed Film Stars: Luke Wilson Looking for Relevance:

          Luke Wilson has always been the “other Wilson” to his older brother Owen. There was a time, however, when Luke was as highly regarded as his sibling, with the two both starting their careers appearing in college chum Wes Anderson’s films. Luke Wilson then parlayed his more standard good looks into playing the straight man for comedians like Will Ferrell and Martin Lawrence. But it’s been a long while since the last time that Wilson had anything resembling a big screen hit, either commercially or critically. While he’s part of the all-star cast in Adam Sandler’s upcoming Western comedy, The Ridiculous Six, we miss the days when the actor was running interference for “Frank the Tank.”

          Old School

          Wilson was the hero of Todd Phillips’ breakthrough comedy. His sad-sack Mitch provided the opportunity for his buddies Vince Vaughn and Ferrell to unleash their shtick as they convert his new place into a frat house. Vaughn and Ferrell may get all of the memorable lines, but it’s Wilson trying to win the affection of his high school flame (Ellen Pompeo) that provided the spine for the story. Wilson’s more subdued style was the perfect complement to the gonzo Ferrell and manic Vaughn.

          The Royal Tenenbaums

          Wilson had already worked with Anderson and his brother on Bottle Rocket and Rushmore before the director proved that he was more than just quirky with The Royal Tenenbaums. Despite his Bjorn Borg getup, Wilson gave a strong performance as the former tennis star son of Gene Hackman’s Royal. Sure, his relationship with sister Gwyneth Paltrow might have been uncomfortably close, but his indoor tent, complete with Rolling Stones vinyl, was totally cool.

          Home Fries

          On the one hand, it must have been nice to make a movie with then-girlfriend Drew Barrymore. On the downside, Vince Gilligan, who wrote the script, had not quite found his Breaking Bad stride yet. The story focuses on Wilson and his brother, played by Jake Busey, who accidentally kill their stepfather. Wilson then falls in love with his now deceased stepdad’s pregnant girlfriend (Barrymore). The film tries to be an edgy comedy, but falls flat on both counts. Barrymore and Wilson are really, really cute, though.

          My Super Ex-Girlfriend

          On the surface, the film’s concept sounds promising. A guy finds out that the crazy girl he’s broken up with is really a superhero, and she’s not happy about being dumped. The execution, however, is something different. Despite having Uma Thurman as the spurned superhero, Anna Faris as Wilson’s more normal love interest, and supporting roles from Rainn Wilson and Eddie Izzard, the movie never takes flight. Director Ivan Reitman seemingly forgot that a good concept still needs a decent script to make it work.


          There’s a reason that Wilson doesn’t seem like the horror movie type — it’s because he’s not, which Vacancy managed to prove. Wilson co-stars with Kate Beckinsale as a couple who check into a motel, only to realize that it’s the home site of snuff filmmakers. The duo spend a night trying to avoid being slashed, but in the end, Beckinsale — an action hero in the Underworld movies — comes across as being tougher than her on-screen mate. That wouldn’t be a problem if there was anything interesting going on beyond a basic cat-and-mouse story.


    • Movies so bad or controversial that they largely ended genuinely thriving acting careers:,9812306,7

      Uma Thurman – She squandered any Kill Bill momentum with My Super Ex Girlfriend.

      Supposedly there is going to be a Kill Bill 3. She needs it.

      by: Anonymous reply 129 11/07/2010 @ 10:41AM


      • Uma Thurman:,9315236

        I think of the career that Uma Thurman has had. Why is she falling off the radar? I know that she is a mother now and motherhood comes first. She’s forty years old. Does anyone think she will end up on a TV show one of these days?

        by: Original Poster replies 103 06/14/2010 @ 04:05PM

        She is not a very good actress and is, probably, more interested in finding a rich husband than working.

        by: Anonymous reply 2 06/14/2010 @ 04:14PM

        I agree, she’s not a good actress. And she looks more and more mannish the older she gets. I don’t think she’ll wind up on TV though, we’ll probably see her in a lot more indie productions.

        by: Anonymous reply 3 06/14/2010 @ 04:20PM

        She’s a massive coke-head with all the associated personality defects. Total c**t. No way to know if it’s her or the drugs because she’s a serious addict.

        by: Anonymous reply 6 06/14/2010 @ 04:27PM

        I always have found her ugly and could not understand why the media proclaimed her to be gorgeous. Also, she’s never been a popular actress that the public loves. No, she was mostly media hype.

        by: Anonymous reply 7 06/14/2010 @ 04:38PM

        I have heard the same thing about Uma being a coke-head. She apparently started doing coke years ago to lose weight and stay thin. It kind of stuck.

        by: Anonymous reply 9 06/14/2010 @ 05:12PM

        She’s had an eclectic career and she has a unique look, even if she is sort of ugly.

        The Tarantino pics made her “cool” to the general public for a while (and she was fairly kick-ass in those films), but she’s tapered off in terms of coolness and general celebrity.

        Yeah, she’s only 40, but she’s had a career most people would die for. If she never does anything critically acclaimed and/or super popular again, it really won’t matter.

        I’m sure Tarantino will use her down the road.

        by: Anonymous reply 18 06/15/2010 @ 02:58AM

        Don’t forget she is a pothead along with that major scatterbrain, slob Cameron Diaz. I’m sorry, but I never did like Uma Thurman. I think she is so overrated in every way. The woman is ugly, her acting is awful, and she is a complete sleaze ball. I remember when she was newly married to Ethan Hawk, a gossip columnists said the two were spotted at a New York antique store having sex on an antique chair in the store. Customers ran out grossed out and horrified. They people said the two of them smelled, and looked like they haven’t washed in months. Most likely they weren’t clean because Ethan and Uma were major potheads.

        by: Anonymous reply 20 06/15/2010 @ 04:29AM

        I like her but she’s done some awful movies (“My Super Ex-Girlfriend”). She was great in Pulp Fiction and everywhere else where she plays icy and aloof.

        by: Anonymous reply 31 06/15/2010 @ 12:11PM

        IMO she makes up for all faults in Kill Bill 1 and 2. Amazing, one of a kind performance. Whatever she and Quentin Tarantino do together in their off time she knows how to act in his films. Its kind of like how Darryl Hannah was suddenly good in Kill Bill 2 despite never having shown a shred of talent or humor.

        by: Anonymous reply 39 06/17/2010 @ 01:57AM

        She had a career because she had shockingly great t**s when she was young and showed em. Bad taste in men — at least Ethan Hawke was a pretentious artiste with crooked teeth instead of a tacky Euro poseur like Busson. She is also box office poison. Absolutely no fly-over appeal, never did have. But I was surprised to find I liked Super Ex-Girlfriend.

        by: Anonymous reply 53 06/18/2010 @ 03:25PM

        She should have had a better career – she is sexy, interesting and has style but unfortunately she arrived at a time when Hollywood got dumber and the female actresses got younger and blanker and bimboy-ier

        She is going to be in that transsexual movie with Nicole Kidman

        by: Anonymous reply 59 06/20/2010 @ 03:54PM

        Wow. You have absolutely zero taste if you think that Uma’s Poison Ivy was “iconic”. Her performance was inauthentic and immature and the attitude she exuded was completely wrong for the part. Batman & Robin will forever be laughed at, and that includes Uma’s performance.

        by: Anonymous reply 62 06/20/2010 @ 07:16PM

        She was on Jimmy Kimmel. She is the most off-putting person. Screechy laughter, physically clumsy, incredibly awkward. Appears to be dumb as a post. I can see why Tarantino hires her. She is basically the female Tarantino. And God has she aged badly. Easy to see why Hawke was f***ing the nanny.

        by: Anonymous reply 102 03/18/2014 @ 07:50AM


        • Uma Thurman : What happened to her once A-list career ?

          She played lead roles in iconic films such as Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill etc. .She is drop dead gorgeous and got an academy award nomination.She was also married to A-list actors Ethan Hawke and Gary Oldman in the past. But despite all this, she is now lurking in oblivion. What do you think went wrong ? Do you consider her career a super success ?
          P.S – I am the only who thinks she has the most beautiful name of all actresses ?

          —Gary Oldman and Ethan Hawke (2252 views)

          118 replies 26 07/26/2015

          Thurman was always slightly oddball, even at her most beautiful in the 90’s. She didn’t do full-on sex bomb roles. She did the ingenue role in Dangerous liaisons but I think after that she kept her tits to herself, and tended towards the kooky roles. More a very successful quirky cult actress than a A+ mainstream star. She’ll be best remembered as a Tarantino muse, which she should be fine with, he’s shaping up as one of the great American directors.


          reply 7 07/26/2015

          I just checked IMDb. She has five movies in various stages of production, so she didn’t exactly disappear. She got older, so the lads are going to her anymore, and she probably didn’t want to be as aggressive about going after the big parts. Once you make the kind of money she did, I can imagine just sitting back and working when and if I felt like it. Trying to stay A list would be exhausting.


          reply 14 07/26/2015

          I recall her saying in an interview that she wasn’t comfortable being a sex symbol when she was young. She was in her late teens when that started and it was weird for her. I think she preferred the indie route to the hot actress route.

          Straight guys love to talk about how actresses and models aren’t hot enough for them. Uma has had a string of wealthy men. Obviously many men find her attractive.


          reply 35 07/26/2015

          Never was an A lister, or at least never, ever sold tickets. Too beautiful to connect to mainstream audiences and women were probably more jealous of her than wanted to be her (or women couldn’t see themselves in her).

          Very talented though. Unquestionable acting skills plus the ability to do quirky comedy. Great on camera. But she also failed to carry any huge hits outside of the Tarantino films.


          reply 41 07/26/2015

          She was the best part of B&R (well, she and Michael Gough as Alfred). But the double whammy of being in that bomb and the remake of the 60’s Avengers, did a lot.of damage to her career. Fortunately for her, Quentin has taken good care of her, and helped revive her career with his quirky films.


          reply 54 07/26/2015

          I agree with r32that she’s an acquired taste. I think she’s got an unusual beauty that doesn’t always transfer to her films, but my bf thinks she looks like a bug. Neither of us think she’s a great actress, tho Tarantino was able to bring out the best of her talent as did James Ivory in “The Golden Bowl” (tho I realize most won’t agree with me on the later). I think with the right scripts and right directors she could have a great later in life career if she doesn’t pick rolls that try to make a sex object of her.


          reply 58 07/27/2015

          An uneven actress to put it mildly. Tom Hanks nixed her for the female lead in BONFIRE OF THE VANITIES, saying that her audition was like high-school acting (this is from Julie Salomon’s book). She can be effective with a good script and a director who can handle her carefully, but she’s not one to be left to her own devices. She was an embarrassing Mrs. Peel in THE AVENGERS, and I found her very actressy in THE SLAP (Thandie Newton was the best of the cast members in that underwhelming show), but have liked her on other occasions (KILL BILL, TAPE, the comedy PRIME with Streep). She was OK in THE GOLDEN BOWL, no more.


          reply 65 07/27/2015

          I like her. She is too different-looking for Hollywood. They like bland, to sell to their lower-common-denominator audiences. Maybe a Hollywood of the 1930s would have used her more.


          reply 67 07/27/2015

          The way she looked was not the problem with her career. She just never went for the blockbuster parts after a certain point and then she got older. There aren’t more than a handful of actresses her age with superstar careers anymore. Plus, as has been mentioned, she’s had relationships with extremely wealthy men and is well set on her own. She probably preferred the jet set life to making a string of B movies.


          reply 75 07/27/2015

          I always found her to be quirky looking. Different. In her case, “different” didn’t equal beautiful. I posted on an Uma thread years ago about my reaction to her in The Truth About Cats And Dogs, the rom-com she did with Janeane Garafalo in which Uma played the intimidating knockout who wants men to take her seriously, and Janeane the plain and sensible woman who couldn’t get a guy. Other than a highly stylized modeling photo, Uma looked terrible in that movie, and I kept thinking, “Huh???” More so than her facial features, it seemed (and seems) that people labeled her as beautiful due to her being blonde, blue, leggy, and having a good body.


          reply 76 07/27/2015

          She never seemed natural onscreen. Hard to relate to.


          reply 85 07/28/2015

          Uma, looks like many runway models in that she’s striking but isn’t beautiful in any traditional sense. She’s tall and thin, which would mean anything she wears would look fantastic and undoubtedly she’d turn head but she wouldn’t necessarily have all the straight men running to hit on her.


          reply 88 07/28/2015

          She’ s never been an A-lister. Gary Oldman and Ethan Hawke have never been A-lister either. They were/are B-list at best. It’ s not necessarily a bad thing. Oldman can act, even though he’ s not the god of acting lots of people think, while Hawke and Thurman are adequate if given the right movie/role. They’ ve never been particularly liked by the critics, yes, they have been nominated for Oscars, but that hardly counts. Also, they can’ t open a movie by themselves.

          In her case, I don’ t buy it that her being mediocre at acting is the reason why she isn’t more famous: most actors nowadays are at her level (if not lower) and are more successful. I think it’ s a combination of aging (hot or not, women after 35 are the Hollywood equivalent of octogenarians) and not caring that much anymore. From her, Hollywood and the audience. You can be an awesome actor, but if you don’ t care to accept roles, or the audience don’ t care to see you, you won’ t get parts. She’ s never been particularly good at choosing projects either. She’ s done 4, 5 movies that can be considered good, everything else was sub-par.


          reply 89 07/28/2015

          She’s besties with Travolta. Career killer.

          OTOH She was the only good thing about that rancid Batman and Robin movie with Arnold and Clooney.


          reply 91 07/28/2015

          The A-list / B-list categorizing is not simple and in Uma’s case it’s obvious we’re talking about an actress who was one of the biggest female stars in Hollywood at one point. I’d say her name is not B-list name even though at the moment she certainly isn’t making anything that big. To me people like Tara Reid (who I actually find rather charming) are B-list.

          But I know I’m probably living in the past a bit since Uma’s been out of the picture for a while and she really was never a huge star outside of Tarantino films. It would be awesome to have more Kill Bill from them. I think I actually have to re-watch Kill Bills since it’s been a while.


          reply 98 07/28/2015

          Ethan Hawke dumped her for an uglier version of herself. That said, Uma’s early success was partly due to having huge, natural boobs on a super slim body. You don’t have to be amazingly gorgeous in Hollywood when you’re built like that. The dirty old rich bigwigs in Hollywood love that look.


          reply 116 08/29/2015

          She aged out of sexy roles.

          I love her and hope she has age-appropriate, smaller films for the rest of her life.

          But the market for sexy actors diminishes with age and the largest share of moviegoers are young people who want to see themselves because they’re ageist.


          reply 117 08/29/2015


    • 10 Actresses Who Could Use a Career Reboot:

      4. Uma Thurman

      When you stop to think of Uma Thurman’s career, it’s easy to see it through rose-colored glasses. That’s because her most defining work has been VERY defining. Chalk it up to the power of Quentin Tarantino. Her sole Oscar nomination came for her turn in Pulp Fiction, and people have loved her ever since. Just when we thought she was a thing of the past, she roared back onto the scene in the Kill Bill double-feature and reminded people just how adeptly she can handle Tarantino’s particular brand of crazy. But in-between those two, and ever since, Uma has had a series of misfires that miraculously haven’t tarnished her name the way they would have many other actresses.

      The list is almost too long: Batman and Robin, Prime, My Super Ex-Girlfriend and the first Percy Jackson movie are among the few that are even recognizable. Her filmography is cluttered with projects better left forgotten. And somehow, she ended up on NBC’s most hate-watchable show, Smash, and came out on the other side with an Emmy nomination.

      Is there hope for her yet?: This is a complicated one. First off, the Emmy nomination can only mean good things. Often times, when actresses realize the creative benefits of television, they can land a great role on a cable series (see: Claire Danes’ reemergence from relative obscurity). So, now that Uma has found success on television, there is a chance she could come back for more. Also, rumblings have been made for years now that her and Quentin Tarantino will reunite for a third installment in the Kill Bill series, which can only mean spectacular things.

      Now, for the bad news. Upon inspection, Uma’s upcoming projects incite the ultimate facepalm. First up is Playing for Keeps, in which Uma stars as a soccer mom alongside Gerard Butler and Jessica Biel, whose resumes don’t exactly encourage me. After that is Eloise in Paris (yes, the children’s book series), Girl Soldier, a message film about child soldiers, and Movie 43, co-starring Uma’s fellow list-members Kristen Bell and Anna Faris. That last one is the sole promising prospect, if only because if it’s bad, Uma can hide behind the rest of the huge cast.

      My suggestion: Uma should convince Quentin Tarantino to fast track Kill Bill Vol. 3 as soon as possible, and keep an eye out for a leading role in a dark cable comedy. It worked for her doppelganger, Toni Collette, so maybe it’d work for her, too.


    • 10 Movie Stars Who Could Really, Really Use A Hit Right Now:

      Uma Thurman
      Thanks to her iconic role in Pulp Fiction, a handful of very well received performances and her high profile former relationships with Ethan Hawke and Gary Oldman, Uma Thurman is still very much a famous actress. Unfortunately, she hasn’t been the leading lady in anything that could be considered a hit since Kill Bill Volume 2 all the way back in 2004. Even worse, she hasn’t really contributed anything to any films any of us actually enjoy in the time since, apart from the mediocre remake of The Producers, the forgettable Super Ex-Girlfriend, a bit part in The Lightning Thief and a pretty good five episode arc on the infuriating since cancelled musical series Smash. If you take those away, we’re down to leads in films like Playing For Keeps, Motherhood, Ceremony, Bel Ami and various TV movies.

      Uma is more than capable of contributing a major role to a likeable film with a big budget, but she’s really not particularly good at carrying comedic weight or being the woman the audience is meant to relate to. She should focus her efforts on picking up a supporting part that allows her to steal a few scenes as an intimidating and eccentric woman no one can take their eyes off of.


      • 12 Actors Who Basically Guarantee You Make A Flop:

        1. Uma Thurman

        In fairness, Uma Thurman has had a number of financial successes over the last few years, such as Kill Bill Volume 2, Be Cool (an ensemble piece), Prime, My Super Ex-Girlfriend, the first Percy Jackson movie (a franchise, and she only had a small part in it), Movie 43 (as part of an ensemble), and Nymphomaniac (in a small role that’s part of an ensemble).

        As you can see, a good number of her hits are heavily qualified by the fact that Thurman’s presence had little bearing on their success. Even the best film of the bunch, Kill Bill Volume 2, was sold more on Quentin Tarantino’s name than her own. So, what about the flops?

        The flops include The Producers, The Life Before Her Eyes, The Accidental Husband, Motherhood (which made only £88 in the UK on its opening weekend), Ceremony, Bel Ami and Playing for Keeps. Fortunately for Thurman, she hasn’t got any recent blockbuster flops to her name (though we haven’t forgotten about the bombing of 1998′s The Avengers or the mediocre showings of Paycheck and Batman & Robin), which keeps her from getting a higher billing on this list.

        Why Is She A Flop? Because outside of the Kill Bill franchise, she just hasn’t done anything exciting or entertaining that audiences want to watch. She’s not a bad actress by any means, but she’s picked a pretty steady stream of boring movies that do little to enhance her star power and profile.


  20. Tell me that “Arnold Schwarzenegger’s career continued to cool off” was an intentional Mr. Freeze pun.

    If so, bravo.


    • I don’t honestly remember, so I’ll just play along and take credit. 😉

      You could say Batman and Robin put his career on ice.
      Audiences and critics told Arnold to chill out.
      Batman and Robin put the Batman franchise into deep freeze.

      Okay, I’m out.


  21. 10 Most Wildly Inconsistent Actors In Movie History:

    Uma Thurman

    Uma Thurman is the Mark Wahlberg of actresses, in the sense that we all – deep down – know she’s a good actress (probably), but she’s turned in so many middling, lousy or downright bad performances over the years that it’s hard to remember whether or not she’s any actually any good. If you took Pulp Fiction and the Kill Bill movies out of Thurman’s filmography, you’d have to wade through a lot of sludge to find any worthwhile performances. And yet because of those Tarantino roles, we know she can act. It’s complicated.

    So let’s look at what we’ve got: My Super Ex-Girlfriend, The Accidental Husband, Playing For Keeps… these are all near-disastrous movies with near-disastrous performances, courtesy of Thurman. Can she only function as an actress when she’s speaking Tarantino’s dialogue? Has she given up trying? Your guess is as good as anybody’s. There are bad movies with good Thurman performances of course: Ceremony and Bel Ami, to name just a recent two, but it’s not enough. As it stands, this gal remains something of an inconsistent mystery.


  22. 10 Movies That Changed Your Mind About Actors You Loved:

    Uma Thurman – My Super Ex-Girlfriend

    Though she had a moderately successful film career before she was ever involved with the likes of Quentin Tarantino, it’s safe to say that most people probably associate the actress with his work; as a result, Thurman is often thought to be one of the coolest actresses in Hollywood – her dual roles as both Mia Wallace in Pulp Fiction and The Bride in Kill Bill have assured that. Aside from those movies, Thurman’s career has been generally hit and miss, but for the most part her image as a worthwhile actress has sustained. Well, until My Super Ex-Girlfriend happened, that is.

    My Super Ex-Girlfriend, a downright terrible “comedy” movie so unworthy of your time and money that it should be made illegal, marked the beginning of the end for Thurman’s career. Up until she added this devastatingly bad venture to her filmography, she was an easy actress to love. Having seen her frankly embarrassing performance here – she co-stars with Luke Wilson – it’s hard to disassociate her from being terrible. We loved Uma for Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill, but in the wake of My Super Ex-Girlfriend, it’s easier to look at her entire career without rose-tinted glasses.


  23. her breakthrough role was pulp fiction then flops came she hadnt had a hit since kill bill her next hit kill bill part 2 . All of them are directed by the q man she should seek him only work in his movies she needs him


  24. terence iam surprised topher grace is not on the list hes a good actor but iam sad to say he will go the way of david curso after he left a hit show his career tanked but maybe interstellar will help him . Its sad to say his career is so dead before it really began spiderman 3 despite what people say made a lot of money its the highest grossing of the seris you would think it would help him. Sad part topher career might be so bad he will never make this website


  25. It will be great that Uma Thurman should play an actor in the movie wonder women


  26. uma was never a list kill bill were only movies that were hits sold her name that was it pulp fiction supporting role seems to me she was never a list she was a sex symbol like kilmer she was in magazines everywhere star on the rise the media hype that star up as a list but in realilty she didnt have box office to back it up


    • I can see your point. I don’t necessarily agree or disagree. But I would argue that Thurman and Kilmer were A-list in a fashion. It’s true, neither of them really anchored a hit movie on their own. Batman movies and Tarantino movies don’t count. The character and the director are the primary selling points of those movies.

      BUT for a time, Hollywood thought Kilmer and Thurman were selling tickets. So they went ahead and gave them A-lister status anyway even if it wasn’t fully deserved. Thurman landed a lot of roles that were clearly intended for an A-list actress. The Avengers, My Super Ex-Girlfriend, she was supposed to sell those movies. Heck, being cast in Batman and Robin shows that Hollywood considered her A-list.

      So it’s arguably a technicality. To me, perception is reality. If the powers that be think you’re selling tickets, it doesn’t matter if you’re actually selling them or not. For a time, you are bestowed with the power of an A-lister. If you don’t actually sell tickets, it won’t last long which is basically what happened with both Thurman and Kilmer.


  27. do u agree with me lebeau uma never reached a list like kilmer


  28. but if the media pumped them up to be a lists it they dont follow your golden rule the fact is they dont have the box office pull means they were never a list it felt look but there were never u mention colin and jude never hitting a list they were closer to it then uma and kilmer yet u dont mention those two never hitting a list when an actor hyped it tricks people into thinking there a list when there not


    • I look at A-list as a measure of power. Did they have A-list power? I think so. Were they truly A-list? That’s debatable. By a strict definition, you could argue that they were not. I wouldn’t argue either side too vehemently.


  29. phone booth made over 100 million it was just colin in the lead katie holms didnt cruise at the time she just had dawsons creek on her hands she didnt bring people in swat was a huge hit to he was the lead jude was lead cold mountain it made money so did close these actors had more hit then uma and kilmer there still working too


  30. chris o donnle was cast batman does that mean he was an a list then no he was a rising star he never reached a list never had a hit on his name


    • Definitely no. But look at the credits. O’Donnell comes fifth after Kilmer, Jones, Carrey, and Kidman.

      On Batman and Robin, I think he got third billing after Schwarzenegger and Clooney but ahead of Thurman and Silverstone. That shows you he was on his way up, but not A-list yet.

      It’s not an exact science. There’s an art to this.


  31. uma thurman was cast in batman and robin because producers thought she on the verge on the verge being a list like kilmer and quaid there on the verge on breaking into a list but missed it the success of batman forever gave kilmer leading roles in big budget movie to get opportunity to be a list but his movies flopped proving kilmer is not bankable batman forever was a fluke they went to see batman not the next kilmer movie


    • I don’t disagree with that.


    • Uma Thurman on the criticism of “Batman & Robin” (Huffington Post):

      I was a kid when “Batman & Robin” came out, and I worshipped you as Poison Ivy.
      So you must like Mae West? Because what I did was take Mae West and played with it.

      Did you know at the time how notorious its reputation would become?
      What is it notorious for?

      For being campy.
      Well, it came out in a different time when people were still being bitchy about campy. Humor being campy and campy being a code word for gay has changed. I think one of the most beautiful things I will get to say I’ve witnessed in my lifetime is to have lived through part of the major movement of trying to quell persecution of human beings who have a different sexual orientation. If you think of the Berlin Wall coming down, people always talk about all these big things. I think what Pope Francis did 10 days ago, which people have just talked about in hushed voices: “Oh yeah, you hear the pope said that?” — I’m not Catholic, but I have to tell you, to me, Pope Francis should be sainted for this, what he did for mankind. For the millions and millions and millions of people on the earth who have died because of who they were. God, you just got me. So anyway, the word “campy” has nothing to do with “Batman & Robin”; it just somehow made me think of this. Obviously the Batman movies went in a very serious direction, a very humorless direction. Really straight and hardcore.

      Absolutely. They’re beautiful movies, but they’re not the same ones that Tim Burton and Joel Schumacher were making.
      Oh no, they’re totally different: hardcore violence. And I like them. But I think at the time the idea of taking a male superhero and having fun with it and someone using the c-word [campy] on it caused people to be very nasty. And that kind of nastiness was acceptable on those terms. And I think that’s the reason some people were particularly annoyed. They didn’t like seeing that tone applied to their heterosexual male icon.

      That’s an interesting perspective on it.
      Well, it takes time, and the idea that that wasn’t appropriate was because there was a deep-seated discrimination at hand, and hatred and fear. So what Joel did was actually very threatening at the time, and I think it is truly one of the things that we should all feel — and me as a person — is beyond greater than the Berlin Wall coming down. Far more thousands or millions more have died under that discrimination and those biases and those scriptures being interpreted in such a cruel manner compared to those who died coming out of East Germany. Anyway, this is very serious.

      It is. If someone were to play Poison Ivy in a Batman reboot now, who should it be?
      I have a problem where, whenever I want to say a name, it blacks out. She’s the most famous girl ever.

      Jennifer Lawrence?
      No. Well, she’s wonderful, I just watched her last night. I love her acting. No, I have to call you. When I’m interviewed, I go blank on names. Oh! Scarlett Johansson!

      That’s a great one.
      Sorry, I can’t believe this. Every time people ask me to say a name when I’m being interviewed, I just black out. Scarlett Johansson would be fabulous. It’s a must.


      • I’m guessing the whole “you must be homophobic” for hating “Batman & Robin” perception immediately has to do w/ the single fact that Joel Schumacher, an openly gay man, directed “Batman & Robin”. Schumacher was the immediate and main fall guy for the criticism.


      • Re: If B&R was good

        I don’t think it’s on the message boards anymore, but I came up with an idea about a year or two ago for an alternative film titled Batman vs. Robin. Essentially the idea was to have the film focus on the triangular conflict/love triangle between Batman, Poison Ivy, and Robin with Freeze as a secondary villain. The film would begin with Batman and Robin fighting Freeze like in the film but continue the animosity the two heroes start to build for each other. Ivy would gain her powers and become part plant but be devastated when she finds construction workers from Wayne Enterprises destroy her plants (which she sees as her children) in the rain forest and vow revenge on Wayne Enterprises and all humanity. She would go to Gotham and seduce Bruce Wayne as Pamela Isley to gain access to the company and use his resources to aid in her mission. While they make out at Wayne Manor, Pamela would steal Bruce’s access card and Bruce would leave after he sees the Batman signal to change into Batman. Batman and Robin would go fight Freeze at Wayne Tower where he is trying to retrieve his frozen wife. Meanwhile, Pamela would suit up as Poison Ivy and use Bruce’s access card to break into Wayne Tower. During their fight with Freeze and his henchman, Batman and Robin argue over how they should fight Freeze. Ivy breaks into the Wayne Enterprise vault but doesn’t know the combination so she uses a bomb to blow it open, causing an explosion that kills Freeze’s wife. Batman apprehends Freeze while Robin chases after Ivy. Robin and Ivy fight but she flirts with him in the process and puts him under a sort of spell and convinces him to forget about Batman and being a hero and join her. Robin lets Ivy go with the money and the two form a romantic relationship. So, Pamela goes out with Bruce Wayne while Ivy has a relationship with Robin. Batman and Robin continue to argue with each other as Pamela/Ivy continues to put them at odds with one another. Bruce starts to notice something off about Pamela and finds out that she is actually Poison Ivy. He confronts her at Wayne Manor and has Dick try to help him apprehend her, but Ivy convinces Dick to turn to her side, and the two heroes fight each other throughout Wayne Manor with Dick finally giving Bruce the punch that knocks him out. Ivy and Robin then break in and take over Wayne Tower as like their castle. Ivy releases her plants that grow rapidly and turn Gotham into like a wild rainforest. Ivy and Dick would consummate their relationship to allow Ivy to become pregnant with plant/human hybrids. Bruce would wake up and see the destruction Ivy and the poison-mind Robin have caused and realize his only hope would be to turn to Freeze. So, Batman goes to Arkham Asylum and convinces Freeze to help him stop Ivy (because she killed his wife). The two break out of Arkham and make their way to Wayne Tower. They find giant pods all throughout the building and realize they are the offspring of Ivy and Robin. The pods burst out monstrous plant/human hybrids that Freeze and Batman fight off. They make their way to Ivy’s “throne room” where the villainess is finishing birthing the pods. Robin comes out to defend Ivy and their children. Batman fights Robin while Freeze takes on Ivy and her monster babies. Batman snaps Robin back to reality and the two join the fight. Freeze ultimately kills Ivy and destroys the tower by blowing it up, and through death is reunited with his wife. Batman and Robin escape and put aside their differences and become friends and partners again.


        • Re: The Official Batman & Robin Thread:

          I’d say Michael Gough had the most to do as an actor. Ironically Batman and Robin was the movie where he gave his best Alfred performance. Ivy, next to Bane, had the least to do since she pretty much was a mustache twirling character. Freeze was at least rooted down a bit in the saving his wife angle which allowed him some moments of humanity. Clooney had those great scenes with Gough, and even some good confrontations with Robin. Even Silverstone’s Barbara and her yearn to help her kind old Uncle gave her more to do as an actor than Thurman had as Ivy.

          She was just a walking cliche going around spouting Saturday morning cartoon dialogue and blowing love dust at men. Even her origin was comical. That rant she has at Woodrue was camper than camp. “You corrupt my research into some MANIACAL scheme for world domination. When I get through with you you won’t be able to get a job teaching High School chemistry. You hear me…you PSYCHO!!!!!”.

          Thurman looked sexy as hell, and she’s a great actress, but she was one of the least impressive performers in this movie, and had little to work with.


    • 8 Things DC Comics Wants You To Forget About Poison Ivy

      That Uma Thurman Performance In Batman & Robin

      Batman & Robin might be something of an easy target, but literally no one emerged from that film better for it. Sadly, old Ivy got dragged into things early on, and while there’s much to love about Uma Thurman’s hammy portrayal of the plant-themed villain, DC are less than enthusiastic to remind people of Joel Schumacher’s flick.

      It’s become a cliché to harp on about Batman & Robin, seeing as how pretty much everyone, their aunt and their uncle has had their say in regards to the film, but everyone seems to miss how it’s in that wonderful ‘so bad it’s good’ territory. Ivy goes through what must be ten or so wardrobe changes throughout the feature, each with their own brilliant hairstyle, glitter and what have you, and it’s just too brilliant.

      Everything about Thurman’s performance is just so over the top, and while it is, admittedly, not to everyone’s liking (hence why DC have swept the whole thing under the carpet), the film’s not nearly as banal as it’s made out to be.


  32. my point iam getting at is uma and kilmer were a listers on the rise studio gave them those because they thought they were close to be a listers they had potential


  33. thurman and kilmer couldt have that much power if there movies flopped


    • The power is to make the deals. It has nothing to do with the final box office results except in as much as performing well at the box office gives you more power and performing poorly can reduce your negotiating power. But not always. Flops do not necessarily remove you from the A-list. Johnny Depp has had a string of flops and yet, he’s still got A-list power.


  34. but depp has the box office to back up his a list hes had a list on his name um and kilmer never have i think uma and kilmer were stars on the rise which why they had power stars who were close to a list do get power kilmer uma even chris get power based on close to a list but none of them had a list results to back up they were all hype nothing


    • Yeah, I wasn’t making a direct comparison between Depp and Kilmer or Thurman. Your point about them is well-taken. One could easily argue that they were never A-list. I think one could just as easily argue the opposite point of view that they were briefly. Sometimes it’s hard to determine whether or not they actually achieved A-lists status because it’s not a real thing. It’s perception.


  35. i look by the rules then look at there filmography both never made movies that were hits on there name alone i breifly thought they were a list because of media hype when your hyped up this much it gives the illusion you are but when you dont have the hits to back it up your all hype quaid was everywhere in the 80s he was a heartthrob in magizines but his movies didnt do well average at best his chances at a list are gone


    • That is a good approach. By the strictest definition, I agree with you. The only thing I’ll say is that the “rules” are more like guidelines sometimes.

      In the case of Thurman or Kilmer, if someone said they were A-list, I wouldn’t disagree. If you say they are not, I can’t really disagree with you either by the strictest possible definition of the term.


  36. i guess people think differnetly when they think a list could mean huge name makes a lot of movies i use to think meg ryan was never a list becuase all her hits like rahcel mcadam she co stared with with a big name like cage hanks crystal but maybe iam wrong


    • I tend to judge actresses a little differently because it is very rare for them to headline a movie without a male co-star of equal or bigger marquee value. I would say Ryan was definitely A-list. Along with Julia Roberts, she topped the A-list in the 90s. Back when she was starring with Tom Hanks, they were on relatively equal footing. So I think she gets equal credit for those hits. She was Hollywood’s go-to girl for rom coms.


  37. in 1993 they were equal in 1998 he was bigger kilmer was never a list though tobey maguire another character who played a superhero never made it to a list either some of the actors on your list i think never hit a list broderick lawerence tom bergenger


    • In 1998 Hanks was bigger. He had his Oscar by then. But Ryan was still the reigning queen of rom coms. She was still big enough to deserve a lot of credit for You’ve Got Mail.

      Being A-list isn’t a requirement to be in WTHH. It was when I started, but I have loosened the requirements.


  38. cuban gooding jr never did either


  39. i see ryan and hanks gonna be in a world war 2 movie next year if its a hit ryan gets no credit since hanks is still a box office star good thing u loosened it up cause looking at the list there are more actors in there that never reached a list i only mentioned kilmer and and thurman cause in the article u made it out that they were a lists at one time but there track records says other wise plus when i talk to people about kilmer they make it seem like he was a list at one point then when i point out that outside batman he didnt star in too many big movies either i think he had everyone fooled thinking he was a list with all the hype around him


  40. i say a true a list lets there work speaks for themself hanks u barely about him in the new he wasnt a hearttrhob like kilmer was but his make a lot of money he is very bankable since catch me if you hes not as consitent as he used be but hes pumping out hit movies like danvic code series toy story 3 captain phillips


  41. affleck good example hes everyhwere with the jlo thing but in reality he didnt put out a lot of quality work then daredveil and peal harbour made over 100 million but had huge budgets so they actually lost money aramgdaen Shakespeare in love sold in other peoples names sum of all fear did make money but that was it


  42. Movie Jail: This week’s defendant is…Uma Thurman!

    The Defendant

    The Case

    The Prosecution: Movie 43, Playing for Keeps, Bel Ami, Ceremony, The Accidental Husband, Motherhood, My Super Ex-Girlfriend, Prime, Be Cool, Paycheck, Chelsea Walls, The Golden Bowl, Vatel, The Avengers, Batman & Robin, Even Cowgirls Get the Blues, Jennifer 8, Where the Heart Is, Johnny Be Good

    Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, if you want to know why Uma Thurman is up for Movie Jail, look no further than the actress’ filmography over the past decade. While her Nymphomaniac received decent reviews, she didn’t have a big part in it, and it was her first fresh movie at Rotten Tomatoes since starring in the Kill Bill movies.

    The last ten years haven’t been pretty for Miss Thurman. She has starred in a disappointing sequel (Be Cool), terrible romantic comedies (Playing for Keeps, My Super Ex-Girlfriend, Prime) and also appeared in the infamous Movie 43. Besides receiving negative reviews from most critics, many of her films have also either bombed or underperformed at the box office. Miss Thurman isn’t a bad or lazy actress, however she does have a bad habit of starring in awful movies, and that’s the most frustrating thing about her post-Kill Bill films. She’s a very talented actress, so what is she doing appearing in crap like The Accidental Husband?

    Quentin Tarantino helped launch and relaunch Miss Thurman’s career with Pulp Fiction and the Kill Bill flicks, but while she at least starred in a few good movies after Pulp Fiction, her filmography after Kill Bill is a mess. Maybe the actress should think about hooking up with the director again, because it’s clear her career desperately needs a boost.

    The prosecution knows there are some who love the actress, but considering how dreadful Miss Thurman’s movies have been over these past ten years, we strongly believe she needs to spend some time in Movie Jail.

    The Defense: Nymphomaniac, Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief, The Life Before Her Eyes, The Producers, Kill Bill 1 & 2, Tape, Sweet and Lowdown, Les Misérables, Gattaca, Beautiful Girls, The Truth About Cats & Dogs, A Month by the Lake, Pulp Fiction, Mad Dog and Glory, Final Analysis, Henry & June, Dangerous Liaisons, The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, Kiss Daddy Goodnight

    Ladies and gentlemen, like the prosecution, the defense hasn’t been impressed with most of Miss Thurman’s film as of late, however we don’t believe the actress belongs in Movie Jail, and we don’t think the jury will want to send her there either.

    Miss Thurman is a strong actress, and although many of her recent films have been panned by critics, they usually have great things to say about her performances. The Life Before Her Eyes is only sitting at 24% at Rotten Tomatoes, however many thought she did a excellent job in the film. The Producers is another one that didn’t receive fantastic reviews form critics, but Miss Thurman was praised for her turn in the Mel Brooks film. Although the defense believes Miss Thurman has appeared in a few too many rom-coms, she has starred in many different types of movies, and it’s not as if she’s been playing similar characters in all of her films.

    But the defense believes the main reason why the jury won’t find my client guilty is because of her performances in Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill. She played two very memorable (and borderline iconic) characters with her Mia Wallace and The Bride, and that goes a long way with jury members. But it’s not like those are the only good movies Miss Thurman has starred in either, and the actress has also done very solid work on the small screen (Hysterical Blindness, Smash, My Zinc Bed) as well.

    Without Pulp Fiction and the Kill Bill movies, the prosecution might have a case against my client, however that’s a big might when you consider how great she’s been in other projects. Miss Thurman definitely needs to start picking better projects to work on, but the defense doesn’t think she should go to Movie Jail.


    Do you think the problem is the movies Miss Thurman has starred in, or the actress herself? Does she deserve to go to Movie Jail, or do you think she desperately needs a better agent? Is Uma Thurman GUILTY or NOT GUILTY?


  43. Re: Who is Blacklisted in Hollywood and why (bring the tea):

    Was Uma T blacklisted? I read a couple years ago she got into an argument with q taren tino and he told her she’ll never have a job in hollywood. Also she wasn’t down with those “eyes wide shut” parties.


  44. Be Cool in Top 10 Worst Movies with Great Casts


  45. Blockbuster Buster: The Avengers (1998)

    Cause Extraordinary Crimes to Cinema must be avenged by Critics Extraordinary.


  46. Blockbuster Buster: My Super Ex-Girlfriend

    Stupid Ex-Girlfriend is a more accurate title.


  47. 10 Actors/Actresses Completely Cut From Movies After Filming:

    Uma Thurman – Savages

    Getting right down to it, Uma Thurman being cut from Savages was one of the problems with this film. You’d think Oliver Stone could wrangle a little more say-so in meetings with studio brass, but that’s not the case. They kept pressuring Oliver to cut the film in length, and he fought tooth and nail to keep Uma in the mix. Ultimately, she was the one thing that could be cut, and the film would still “work.” Sadly, it robbed the film of its soul, and some of the understanding. Uma was cast to play the mother of O (Blake Lively), and it offered a deeper understanding as to why Blake’s character was the way she was. It built the foundation for such a desperate lifestyle, and doggoneit, it was excellent casting! If you’ve yet to see the film, you’ll agree: Uma should have stayed in the picture.


  48. Uma Thurman: 5 Awesome Performances And 5 That Sucked

    No prizes for guessing which category Batman And Robin fits into.



    Uma Thurman and Janeane Garofalo starred in The Truth About Cats And Dogs, a 90s movie that deserves more love…


  50. 11 Actors Who Survived Career Suicide Twice

    Uma Thurman

    Uma Thurman will forever have a place in the hearts of filmgoers because of Pulp Fiction, but she has a bad habit of signing on for crap following a triumph. She put the brakes on a potentially huge career after Pulp thanks to the one-two punch of Batman & Robin and The Avengers; they were awful, and sadly she was awful in them.

    She went through a dry spell in her career following this, but when Tarantino came along with Kill Bill she looked set to come back in a huge way; yet for some inexplicable reason she followed them up with muck like Paycheck and My Super Ex-Girlfriend.

    Again it looked like she’d squandered her chance, but in recent years she’s been doing excellent work in character roles like Nymphomaniac and The Slap, and Tarantino will no doubt call on her services again sometime soon.


  51. 15 Actors Stuck In Hollywood’s Dog House

    Uma Thurman

    Sexy, talented and kick-ass, Uma Thurman has/had everything but recently she has been limited to roles that even Jennifer Aniston might have thought twice about. In the 1990’s performances in Pulp Fiction and Gattaca positioned her as one of Hollywood’s leading lights, but roles as Poison Ivy in franchise killer Batman & Robin, and the financial disaster that was the remake of British television series The Avengers effectively turned that light off.

    After a hiatus following the birth of first child, Thurman returned with the Kill Bill volumes that saw her threaten those heady heights once again but little else since has shown any promise. A victim of the Movie 43 curse (it’s hard to have sympathy), Thurman has done nothing to trouble the box office in the last few years.

    So What Next?

    Who else thinks Thurman is probably casting envious glances over at Jennifer Jason Leigh? More than anything else she needs a call from her close pal Quentin and another plum role to show off her talents. With Kill Bill 3 repeatedly rumored, that redemption might be closer than ever.


    • Why did Uma Thurman stop getting awesome roles after Kill Bill?

      Without a doubt, Uma Thurman’s career highlights are from Quentin Tarantino’s work – Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction.

      Tarantino films are full of great one-off performances. However, his style and method of filmmaking are so specific, that it’s almost impossible for a storytelling technique or an actor to work that well outside of a Tarantino film.

      Uma is a good actress, but Tarantino is the only director who is able to bring out the absolute best in her. I can’t think of a movie where Uma has that amazing screen presence that made Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction so great.

      This is also the cases with a few other Tarantino regulars. Good, but not amazing ones if you take away Quentin:

      Michael Madsen

      Tim Roth

      Michael Parks

      Christoph Waltz

      Quentin Tarantino whenever he’s not in his own stuff – like in interviews or everyday life.

      Lee Thé, works at Retired/working on a Novel
      Answered Jun 9
      Some good answers here, but no one has mentioned another factor: she’s six feet tall. And Hollywood is full of short leading men like Tom Cruise, who nearly always want leading ladies shorter than them.

      Scarlett Johansson, for example, is 5′4″—and a good actress with stunning looks as well—and one of the most successful Hollywood actresses.

      Taller actresses have, can, and will have successful movie careers, but the taller they are the tougher it gets. Imagine if Maria Sharapova the tennis star—who’s 6′3″—wanted to try acting in Hollywood. Apart from virginal Amazon roles, how much of a chance would she have, regardless of whether she can act?

      Quentin Tarantino is 6′1″ himself—much taller than the average Hollywood leading man. Yet in average-height heels she towers over even him.



    Paul Gleason is hilarious in this movie, he really is. As a coaching counterpart to the assistant principal in The Breakfast Club (1985), he provides the only beacon of light in Johnny Be Good, an otherwise ridiculous ’80s comedy. To put things in perspective, Anthony Michael Hall, who so convincingly played the nerd a few years prior, was now presented as the big man on campus, snagging ladies and football scholarships with ease. Um…no? The jump just doesn’t work here, and a script built around a running joke only furthers the lack of laughs scattered over this eternal 90 minutes.

    Uma Thurman pops up as youthful eye candy, but it’s RDJ’s appearance that really pushes this thing into WTF territory. Playing Hall’s best pal and the closest thing ever to a human Looney Toon, his off-the-wall ramblings are downright confusing opposite the jock’s gawky machismo. And that’s just the first half; things go down quicker than an Olympic diver on the latter part of the picture, no doubt aided by Downey’s motor-mouthed madness. It’s a move no one ever talks about anymore, and if ever graced with it’s presence, you’ll understand why.


  53. 10 Actors Who Need a Redemption Movie ASAP

    Uma Thurman

    Uma Thurman could be resumed in three words: “Quentin Tarantino Muse”. Back in the 90’s, her face was in every bedroom wall, and in the early 2000’s she brought back the yellow tracksuit into fashion, all that thanks to QT two masterpieces: Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill Vol.1 and Vol.2.

    But to do her justice, she is a skilled and accomplished actress who can do well in James Ivory (The Golden Cirle) and John Woo (Paycheck) universes… She can be as praised and acclaimed as in Gattaca or lose big like in Batman & Robin or the Avengers (No, not the one with Shawarma , the other one).

    After changing our lives being Beatrix Kiddo, she strangely opted for a different type of movies: Rom-Com and familiar dramas. What came next was a wreck; we had An Extraordinary Husband, Life Before Her Eyes, Motherhood, Prime, My Super Ex-Girlfriend…. Instead of becoming the Sigourney Weaver type of actresses, she went to be the one producers call when Sarah Jessica Parker is busy.

    How can she rise again: Those last years, Hollywood is fond of strong badass women avatars like Furiosa , Ilsa Fauslt or Gina Carano/Ronda Rousey flicks. Like Zellweger with comedies, Uma Thurman could convert again into the action/sci-fi genres.

    Add to that, no one is against seeing her teaming against with Quentin Tarantino, after all, she is his muse.


  54. Uma Thurman joins Bravo drama “My So-Called Life”

    Uma Thurman Joins Cast of Bravo’s Scripted Drama ‘My So Called Wife’
    by Elizabeth Wagmeister

    Uma Thurman has joined the cast of Bravo’s upcoming scripted series “My So Called Wife,” Variety has learned.

    The Golden Globe winner and Academy Award nominee will appear as a guest star in a story arc that spans several episodes.

    “My So Called Wife,” which was greenlit this March, follows a con artist, played by Inbar Lavi, who is as beautiful as she is dangerous, which makes her unsuspecting victims even more tormented when they realize they have been used and robbed of everything, including their hearts.

    But things get complicated when her latest victims, Ezra (Rob Heaps) and Richard (Parker Young) try to track her down just as she eyes her next mark, Patrick (Stephen Bishop).

    Thurman will play Lenny Cohen, the ultimate fixer.

    When the reclusive ring-leader of a group of con artists needs to keep his employees in line, eliminate an enemy or whip up a world class omelette, there is only one person for the job — the lethal, articulate and mysterious Lenny Cohen.


  55. There’s an interesting theory about her brief marriage to Gary Oldman. I read this, IIRC, on google groups (interesting site btw, you can see forum discussions going back to the early 90s). The buzz in Hollywood was that he was about to become a big star and she wanted to be associated with him before that happened. Similar, to a lesser extent, to what people suspected was Demi Moore’s motive for marrying Bruce Willis. Except Oldman didn’t get the stardom as predicted so she left him in the dust as soon as she realized his career wasn’t going anywhere.


  56. Its funny uma was a big star yet aside from the Quienten movies and a bit part in dangerous liaisons none of her films where hits. People must talked aobut her looks more cause no one saw her flicks


    • Rows of flops next to the milestones in her filmography prove she isn’t a box office draw. But she is a household name. Pulp Fiction and even Batman & Robin are staples of the ’90s. The Kill Bill movies were staples of the ’00s.

      She also comes off as very personable and is charming in every role. It always bugs me when people refer to her as “exotic” or “unconventional looking.” In the photoshoot scene in The Truth About Cats & Dogs, she was perfect.

      That photo of her at the top of the page doesn’t do her justice. I wonder whether it’s incidental or was chosen to make a point. On a few of these “What the hell happened to…” entries, the ostensibly “recent” picture is from nearly ten years ago where the subject of the entry still appears to be looking fabulous.


      • That picture was current the last time I did an update. I’ll swap it out next time. When I select the picture, I try to find one that is current, not staged for a magazine shoot, not unflattering but not overly glamorous. I’m never actively trying to make the subject look bad. At least not with the picture at the top of the article.


  57. Uma’s mom Nena Thurman used to be a big time model. Her first husband was LSD guru Timothy Leary. They divorced and she has been married to Uma’s dad for 50 years.


  58. Uma Thurman’s Baby Daddy Forcing Her to Choose Movie or the Kid

    Uma Thurman is stuck between a rock and a hard place … if she shoots a movie she won’t see her daughter. That’s the predicament she’s in, thanks to her baby daddy.

    Uma’s ex-fiance, Arpad Busson, just filed legal docs asking a judge to prohibit her from taking their 4-year-old daughter to Europe while she shoots a movie … sources familiar with the situation tell TMZ.

    We’re told Uma has been blindsided by the latest conflict … she’s supposed to leave in 2 days.

    Arpad wants the kid to stay put in NYC, so now a judge will decide … possibly creating a real-life “Sophie’s Choice” for Uma.

    TMZ broke the story … Uma and Arpad’s nasty custody battle heads to court in a few months to hash out visitation rights.

    A rep for Uma tells us … they’ll let the lawyers and judge handle it.


    • I wonder if she met Arpad when she was doing Batman & Robin. Elle Macpherson who had a small role in the movie was dating him at the time.

      Her personal life is kind of a mess but I love how she’s so dignified and weathers scandals with such grace. She never courts controversy unlike so many.


  59. Nena von Schlebrügge (a.k.a. Uma Thurman’s mother) circa November 1961


  60. Why Uma Thurman Doesn’t Get Many Movie Offers Anymore

    Once upon a time, Uma Thurman was Hollywood’s hottest starlet. After Pulp Fiction wowed critics and moviegoers alike in 1994, Thurman seemed destined for box office greatness, but that fiercely shining star has dimmed in recent years. Let’s take a look at why she doesn’t get many movie offers anymore.


  61. Blind Items Revealed #4

    November 4, 2016

    This very tall B+ list mostly movie actress who has been working for decades is hooking up with the married head of a foreign conglomerate. He has been sending a lot of very highly paid work her way.

    Uma Thurman


  62. Uma Thurman’s Custody Battle Got Uglier

    Actress and Quentin Tarantino fetish object Uma Thurman is currently locked in a custody battle with her ex-boyfriend Arpad (Arki) Busson over their four-year-old daughter, Luna.
    Last week, Arki accused Uma of mixing pills and booze while she accused him of letting Luna ride a scooter without a helmet (um…). Uma finally got her hands on some alleged real dirt this week. We’ve got hookers, the threatening of ex-girlfriends, and cheating on high school tests! True, one of those accusations is a little frivolous compared to the other two, but, you have to throw everything at the reputation wall and see what sticks!


  63. Blind Items Revealed #3

    November 30, 2016

    This aging, very tall B+ list mostly movie actress has now gone up three breast sizes in the past two years. She is convinced it is getting her more work after having trouble in the year prior to her first surgery.

    Uma Thurman


  64. Uma’s dad says the industry doesn’t take proper advatage of her.


  65. Uma Thurman says turning down Lord of the Rings was one of her worst decisions

    Uma Thurman really, really regrets turning down the role of Éowyn in the Lord of the Rings franchise.

    “I do consider it one of the worst decisions I ever made,” the actress said while speaking with Lord of the Rings super fan Stephen Colbert on The Late Show Monday night. “But I had just had my first child, and I just, I don’t know, I was a little house bound.”

    “I think it was a little bit, little unknown for me,” she added of uprooting her family to move to New Zealand for the movie’s long filming process. “But it was definitely a regret.”

    This isn’t the first time that Thurman has said she hated that she missed out on the role. In an interview with DigitalSpy in 2008, she said that she wished she “could’ve been able to take that plunge,” but that she couldn’t with her young daughter. The Thin Red Line star Miranda Otto ended up taking on the part.

    It is likely that if Thurman had taken on the role of Éowyn she would have missed out on her most famous role as The Bride in the Kill Bill films, which definitely would have been a shame. However, it would have been interesting to see the actress’ take on the famous Tolkein character.

    Thurman isn’t the only actor to turn down a part in the Lord of the Rings series: read up on all of the actors who could have been a part of the famous fantasy franchise.


  66. WTF happened to Uma Thurman’s career?

    She’s now relegated to a guest star on the show Imposters?

    —Anonymous (622 views)

    37 replies 35 19 hours ago

    She was always overrated and over-exposed.


    reply 1 19 hours ago

    She was never a good actress. She had an OK face with an extraordinary body. She was also blonde. That will take you very far in Hollywood. Now she’s aged horribly and her looks can’t hide her lack of talent anymore. And then there is the rumored drug use.


    reply 2 19 hours ago

    She could be a very good actress. She was great in Even Cowgirls Get the Blues but it was a difficult novel to film, and failed despite many hilarious sequences.

    She just disappeared for too long and then it was too late.


    reply 4 19 hours ago

    She was a guest star on Smash. There’s no coming back from that.


    reply 6 19 hours ago

    Mental illness. It was an issue during her recent divorce and child custody battle.


    reply 8 18 hours ago

    I did that awful movie where I played the Jewish therapist with her. So awful. I didn’t even get a Globe nomination for that one. How humiliating. I even got Globe nods for She-Devil and Death Becomes Her. You have to be really bad to not even be globe nominated.


    reply 10 18 hours ago

    What really puzzles me is that she’s on a Bravo (scripted drama) show. I mean HBO, sure. But Bravo, really?


    reply 13 15 hours ago

    It was supposed to be private and her lawyers were outraged.

    She has low affect. She’s not “mentally ill” she drinks and takes (or took) antidepressants and adderall. Big wup. Her problem is she is lazy and luxury dependent. Rather like Vanessa Paradis. She’s been in the euro-trash jet set crowd for decades. Truly many ladies who do nothing much. Arpad Busson is a chic slime-ball. Pursued this trophy for years after being Elle Macpherson’s sugar daddy and baby daddy. Truly baroque soap operatic family history for both parties. Read the first paragraph in his wiki article to get a gander.

    In short, their kid was born f***ed for life.


    reply 14 13 hours ago

    Aspie Tarantino got tired of her for his pop up MTV videos he calls films. Her wide spaced eyes just don’t do it for us.


    reply 15 12 hours ago

    All her men leave her. She must be difficult to be with. Ethan Hawke, Gary Oldman, Timothy Hutton and many others have sampled her then moved on.


    reply 20 11 hours ago

    She had cosmetic surgery and it changed her looks, not for the better. She was supposed to do a television movie about the life of Anita Bryant. What ever became of it?


    reply 24 10 hours ago

    What happened to her career is that it went much further and lasted much longer than it had any reason to.


    reply 27 10 hours ago

    She aged. She took time off to have kids and be a mom. There aren’t a lot of parts for women over 40. Those parts tend to go to the women who’ve been working steadily, keeping their names and faces relevant. You’ve got to keep hustling.

    I wouldn’t pay much attention her exes allegations, the court ruled in her favor.


    reply 30 9 hours ago


    • 14 Actors Who Desperately Need A Hit Movie

      Uma Thurman

      Another Tarantino alum who can’t seem to catch a break, Uma Thurman’s career has cooled down significantly in recent years, generally taking small supporting roles in movies that either bombed or didn’t get a major theatrical release.

      Thurman’s last starring project to be even moderately successful was 2006’s My Super Ex-Girlfriend, and though a few of her movies since have been hits, typically she’s only appeared in them for a few scattered scenes, so she can’t really take much credit.

      As for the future, she does have six movies due for release over the next year, though only upcoming thriller Serenity, co-starring Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway, has any real box office potential.


  67. Uma Thurman Cast in Lars von Trier’s The House That Jack Built

    Thurman joins Matt Dillon in the upcoming Lars von Trier serial killer film The House That Jack Built




    #2 – She swears she never slept with Harvey. I have known her about as long as any actress of any significance. I believe her. She has never been A+ list but has been A. Very tall. Oscar nominee/winner. I have written about her a lot. She said that Harvey had nude scenes of her spliced together and also other actresses. He would sit in his office and watch them on a loop and then have sex with actresses while the loop of the actresses played in the background. Uma Thurman



        There is widespread sexual power gaming going on in Hollywood. When it’s done against children it’s unspeakable. If it involves force it also is unspeakable.

        But it’s often a two way street. Many of these starlets suck d*** or take bu**ake for good roles. This gives them an unfair advantage over more talented actors. Then when the wind changes direction they can act like victims and cash in all over again. This seems to be what Argento did.

        Uma Thurman also seems to have been willingly involved — Tarantino apparently was fascinated by her big feet and had his way with them many times. I suspect that’s why she made that non-comment a day or so ago. She isn’t going to say a f***ing word because she willingly played the game, but she spun it to make it seem like she was full of righteous indignation. Clever girl.


        reply 48 25 minutes ago


    • Uma Thurman slams Harvey Weinstein: ‘You don’t deserve a bullet’

      Here is an interesting part of the report at OP’s link

      Thurman’s Kill Bill costar Daryl Hannah is one of the women to accuse Weinstein of sexual misconduct. On one occasion, Hannah said she had been forced to barricade herself in her hotel room to keep him out. She also shared that among the people she made aware of Weinstein’s actions was Quentin Tarantino, who directed Kill Bill, as well as Thurman in Pulp Fiction. Tarantino has since admitted that he “knew enough to do more than I did.”

      So Uma knew about Weinstein harassing Daryl Hannah. So did that piece of s*** Tarrantino. He knew all about it. So did Affleck, Clooney and Matt Damon. They can all rot in hell


      reply 20 2 hours ago

      Her response has come across like a badly written script that’s being poorly acted. It seems like her theatricality is meant to deflect so that she can avoid any questions and control how she is portrayed. I get why she wouldn’t come forward earlier than the recent scandals. I also think it’s fine for any actress who doesn’t want to come forward. But her posturing lately over Weinstien is so dramatic that it looks completely insincere. Even though she’s giving an entirely opposite viewpoint she reminds me of Donna Karan’s messy comments on the subject. You could smell the bulls*** even with the volume on mute.


      reply 29 an hour ago

      Two actresses whose careers were made by Miramax/Weinstein films are Uma Thurman and Jennifer Lawrence.

      It’s telling that Lawrence’s comments amount to “Oh, that Harvey!”


      reply 383 7 minutes ago


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: