Review: The Theory of Everything



The biographical film has a pretty checkered history. Sometimes the real facts of a person’s life need only a little dramatic polishing to produce something truly entertaining and meaningful. Other times you can feel the filmmakers stretching to really fill out what should be a fascinating story because while the events or accomplishments may be enormously important, that doesn’t mean that they are very cinematic. Unfortunately, despite some truly wonderful and engaging elements, the new Stephen Hawking biopic too often falls into the latter category.

Perhaps this is because the script is based on the book “Traveling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen,” written by Hawking’s ex-wife Jane (Felicity Jones), who is also the mother of his three children. This was the second, and more warmly nostalgic, memoir she has written about her relationship with Hawking.

The film commences at the point when the two young British students first meet one another at a party at Cambridge University. Although they are shown as not having a great deal in common (he is an atheist scientist, she is a Christian who studies languages and poetry), the chemistry is immediate, with a sweet romantic relationship developing rather quickly. Hawking (Eddie Redmayne) is already a startling intellect, even among his peers, and has developed an interest in the subjects which would later bring him fame and renown. His graduate instructor, as played by David Thewlis (Remus Lupin in the Harry Potter films) has recognized his great potential and helped lead him to his revolutionary thesis on black holes and time.


Where the film excels is in its early stages, working the progress of Hawking’s scientific efforts alongside his blossoming relationship with Jane. These develop at the same time as his diagnosis with the motor neuron disease (ALS) which would result in his total physical reliance on those around him, taking away his independent locomotion, making his swallowing and gross motor skills difficult, and eventually rendering him without speech. This is the version of Hawking which is strong in the public’s memory, confined to a motorized wheelchair and relying on a speech generating device to communicate. Witnessing this gradual and inexorable physical decline as performed by Redmayne is the primary interest of the film, with the details finely realized. Redmayne has received well-deserved critical acclaim for his work and it would be surprising indeed if he is not selected for one of the five available Oscar nominations for lead actor this year. Despite my reservations about the film as a whole, I would recommend “The Theory of Everything” entirely on the strength of his work in this challenging role.

Felicity Jones also impresses as the mostly saintly Jane, showing the transitions the character makes from idealistic young woman in love, to dedicated wife, assisting her husband with every little thing, to frustrated mother with her own independent needs.


Long-time fans of the now gone HBO drama Boardwalk Empire will know exactly what is coming when Jane meets Charlie Cox as Jonathan Jones, the choral director at the local church where Jane goes to get some time for herself. If he had no problem making a cuckold of gangster Nucky Thompson, why should he be concerned about a physicist in a wheelchair? By the way, Cox will be playing Matt Murdock in the coming Daredevil TV series. He’s an appealing actor and it’ll be interesting to see if he can shake off his callow countenance to play the decidedly noble and serious blind superhero lawyer.


The conflict between Hawking’s initial atheism and how it develops as his scientific pursuits continue is dabbled at in the film, but not with enough vigor to call it an important theme in the story. In the end, the concerns of the tawdry real world undercut any hope of this being an inspirational film in any sense of the word. There are no handy pat endings here, and as a story about the relationship between Hawking and Jane, that makes it a patently unsatisfying, if moving, experience. The filmmakers, perhaps wisely, decided to give us only passing information on the nature of Hawking’s extraordinary scientific writings. I may be one of few who would rather have seen a film focused on those ideas.


Posted on December 20, 2014, in Boardwalk Empire, Movies, reviews and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. This is very engrossing, I will probably have to see it.


  2. The consensus seems to be great acting in service of a so-so movie. That’s why I haven’t bothered. Great review though.


  3. Daffy you sum up exactly how I felt about this film. It’s perfectly average, and there’s nothing too offensive to say about it. But when you consider Stephen Hawking is one of the most remarkable men in modern history. He deserves more than an average film.


  4. 1) You’ve seen ‘Hawking’, I take it? If not, might be more up your street. Skips over some of the dodgier personal aspects a little, but it’s a decent documentary nonetheless.

    2) “David Thewlis (Remus Lupin in the Harry Potter films)”
    I cannot tell you how unhappy it makes me to see him referred to as this rather than “David Thewlis (the coruscating Johnny in Mike Leigh’s magnificent ‘Naked’)”. I know he’s done loads more before & since 1993, & of course it makes sense to mention his most widely seen role. But f*ck me, there was a performance …


  5. Having seen the movie now, I will give it a bit higher grade than resident reviewer Mr. Stardust.. I’ll go with B+. I really am in awe of what Eddie Redmayne, who I’ve never heard of, accomplished here. Like Daffy and many other notable critics, I wish the movie had celebrated more of the career and less of the personal. Still a great movie.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: