Advertisements

Review: 13th

13th

Director: Ava DuVernay

Released on Netflix 10/7

Grade: A

When Ava DuVernay’s Selma was shut out of the Academy Awards it prompted backlash with the #oscarssowhite hashtag that lead to changes within the voting system of the Academy. Selma was a superior biopic with strong central performances and a resonant, timely message. The failure of recognition it received, especially in comparison to weaker, similar films like Theory of Everything and Imitation Game, was enough to enact actual progress in the system. DuVernay is now hard at work on A Wrinkle in Time, a big-budget sci-fi that stars actors of color in the lead roles. Before DuVernay moves to sci-fi, she has directed what may be the most important documentary of the year: 13th.

13th is named for the 13th amendment that abolished slavery. What you likely don’t know is that there is an exception to that amendment: Except as punishment for a crime. Meaning, slavery is constitutional if you’re a criminal. What follows is the constantly evolving systematic of black Americans, and especially black men. 13th does the job of drawing a through line from slavery, through reconstruction, to Jim Crow, crack/cocaine, superpredators, and today: where the US houses 25% of the world’s incarcerated population despite only having 5% of the world’s population. The land of the free has more people without freedom than any other nation on the planet.

How did we get here? Through a series of intercut interviews with different experts ranging from activists, academics, politicians, and more we follow the ever-changing face of oppression through 150 years. This is not a partisan picture, as equal shots are taken at Nixon, Reagan, the Clintons, and Trump. It is shown how racism has shifted into different words and ideologies to cover the face but not made it any less subversive to our ideas of equality with words like “Law and Order” and “tough on crime” becoming essential to the American political lexicon. The film is helpfully structured by periods of time that also follows the exponentially growing number of imprisoned Americans, which makes it easier to keep track of the waterfall of information.

You could produce several documentaries under the umbrella of what 13th covers. It could be a 10 part mini-series. What DuVernay has done here is make a swift, 90 minute film that rivets with stories and information, as much as it upsets and shocks. Following slavery the south criminalized blacks at an alarming rate for minor infractions (vagrancy) creating a prison population that could work the jobs that slaves used to work for even cheaper wages. Films like Birth of A Nation showed blacks as criminals and rapists, and Jim Crow criminalized equality in the South. Presidents like Nixon and Reagan created laws that punished minority communities harshly for minor crimes (think of the difference for the slap on the wrist for cocaine, vs. the 10 year sentences for crack in the 80s). Prisons began to be privatized (something the supreme court finally declared unconstitutional this year) and contracts demanded they be full. The war on drugs, the three strike rule, and the militarization of the police force are all covered as being a part of the problem.

It’s always laudable to make an important documentary that is compulsively watchable. This never gets bogged down or melancholic. The tone is thoughtful at times, and full of righteous anger in others. Pundits from the other side (politicians, representatives of businesses profiting from the system) have the chance to tell their side, and rather than be combative, they are allowed to talk, and given enough rope to essentially hang themselves. This is due to the position being mostly indefensible. To remedy this mass incarceration of citizens, prison labor, and overrepresentation of people of color within the correctional facility we will have to move beyond “being tough on crime.” If DuVernay’s previous films are any indication this may get the conversation started.

Advertisements

Posted on October 14, 2016, in reviews, TV and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. SELMA won just as many Oscars as THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING and THE IMITATION GAME, despite the other two movies being nominated in many more categories. Honestly, I thought that SELMA was quite a bit better than both of the other two movies, but aside from a possibly overlooked performance in a very crowded year, I don’t see an argument for it having been nominated for many more Oscars than it was. There were three or four actors who I felt should have been nominated for best actor that year who weren’t. David Oyelowo was just one of them. SELMA was nominated for best picture. Ava Duvernay could have possibly been nominated instead of Morten Tyldum, but again there were a few other directors who also could have been nominated who weren’t.

    Like

  2. The idea that criminal labor is a new type of legal slavery is ridiculous. Comparing the forced removal of people from their homeland, over hundreds of years, forced servitude of them and their descendants, based solely on the fact that they had black skin is in no way relative to people who have willfully engaged in criminal activity and are therefore being punished for that willful activity. That is what we are supposed to take away from this documentary. Also, we are supposed to believe that things are no better for blacks now than during Jim Crow or possibly no better since even the adoption of the 13th Amendment? What complete and utter nonsense.

    And the idea that Nixon, Reagan, and Clinton passed laws to specifically do harm to blacks is also ridiculous. Harsher sentences for crack cocaine were passed by Congress, at the urging of civil rights leaders and members of the Congressional Black Caucus because of the harm the drug was doing to mostly inner city communities. They wanted to rid those neighborhoods of dealers and traffickers. Crack is cheaper and targeted towards kids, teenagers, and young adults, and was doing (and still does) terrible things to communities. I personally would have insisted for parity of the drug laws and for punishing powder cocaine users just as harshly, but it’s not difficult to understand the reasoning behind the thinking that crack dealers and traffickers should be punished harshly.

    What also seems to be ignored is that the individuals most directly affected by anti-crack laws specifically are guilty of committing crimes. Felons and inmates do not have the complete complement of rights that those who are not in jail or who haven’t been in jail enjoy. That is for a reason. It’s punishment. It’s supposed to make the idea of committing these crimes unsavory enough to not commit them. It doesn’t work well enough, but easing the laws will certainly not prevent those who engage in criminal activities any less likely to do so.

    Like

  3. speaking of oscars its official hidden figures has limited release on December to qualify for oscar run does anyone think it has a shot.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: